this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
272 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

5050 readers
49 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Full title: Companies are now using your credit history, past-due accounts, browsing data, and social media accounts to figure out the absolute lowest salary you'll accept. Algorithmic wage suppression is being weaponized against workers to destroy wages.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 55 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] refalo@programming.dev 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wow, this article is a great resource to show someone who thinks privacy is pointless because "I have nothing to hide."

It's hard to find good real-world examples of how people's data is being used in ways they would be against if only they knew about them.

[–] spy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I hope you're right but my guess the response will be "lulz that will not happen". "It's a conspiracy". "There would be a revolution if that happened". "They coulnd't find that out just by knowing which services I use, exactly at what times and how often, how I engage with it".

[–] refalo@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think there will always be people stuck with their existing confirmation biases, but if the advice merely helps less people it's still better than nothing at all... some people are just beyond saving.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

They were arguing in bad faith anyway, cut those freaks off.

[–] MountainVeil@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago

Not a good article, unfortunately. Vague weasel words for the first 5 paragraphs before they get to anything of substance when they say some platforms potentially have something like this. I gave up shortly after. I'm against the practice of course and I don't doubt employers would use this, but if the journalists find something they should really let us know.

[–] DemandtheOxfordComma@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Getting in the door is hard enough without dealing with getting lowballed.

I just want a job. I had many years of stability. Now I want a win win where I get to do a good job and get compensated at the same level.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Time to build a co-op. This exploitation has become so systematized, that it is essentially a runaway genocide.

We need to cut off the parasites by doing something radical!

[–] Mountainaire@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

There are moneyless co-op communities like Bruderhof, which are interesting. The tricky part with those is what happens if you want to exit.

[–] professor_prime@lemmychan.org 1 points 1 week ago

You can get a job.

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

I am hiring at a large national retailer

We aren't doing this. Even if we were, most smart candidates are not going to accept a lowball and I don't want to offer one.

If i paid you the same or barely more than your current salary, you would not change jobs. If I were able to force a shit salary down someone's throat, they are going to keep looking because I forced a shit salary down their throats.

While I don't doubt this is happening, it will only be effective if people accept it. If a company lowballs you, don't take the fucking offer!

I need someone in my open roles. If I don't hire them, I have to do that work. If the company sees me doing the work, they will think that it is OK and it is cheaper to have me do all the work and close the open position. Therefore, I am willing to pay someone a reasonable offer above the original.

Always ask for more. When we need roles filled, most of are good to give. Its not my money, what do I care? I'm certainly not going to rescind the offer because someone asked. Only useless bootlickers who think they will be rewarded by saving the company $10k will hold firm. They will also have a staff full of people that hate them and do shit work. Ask for more.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I pray workers syndicalize, and guillotine every employer doing this.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why guillotine them, when we finally have the very real power to ostracize them, leave them without a livehood?

Much crueler, and something we can actually do and get away with.

We just refuse to work with them, and they are probably fucking dead.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because the state, you know, cops&military, are in their side, and they will bomb you for not coming to work.
They’ve been stealing your dividends all this time.
A slaver only has one goal in mind. Don't give it to them.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's say I thought about that, but I don't openly talk about some solutions. Need to stay on the pacifist side for this to work.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 1 week ago

There is no pacifism to slavery.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Very unlikely that we would have uniform enough decision to do that

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

only if you put your name on our social media accounts though.

[–] professor_prime@lemmychan.org 1 points 1 week ago

How do they afford employees and services that conduct this research?

Oh yeah, with your money.