this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2026
309 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

87279 readers
3513 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unglueclass23@programming.dev 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There's something about Bluesky I just don't quite like. I have an account, sometimes (rarely) I use it. But for example today I wanted to share a short video with a friend. I send him the link - "only logged in users can see this post (OP himself set this option)" ok, weird but let me download the vid and send him - "nope can't do that"

They literally added some frontend bullshit to not allow you to download a freaking video. When you Inspect it with developer tools it shows a button... If you try saving it with right clicking it will save the thumbnail instead... I know there are probably easy-ish workarounds but this sort of instagram closedness pisses me off.

Meanwhile in Mastodon I right click and save video as....

I also don't like the underlying complexity of how decentralization is supposed to work there. That being said, if the choice is between twitter, threads or bluesky, please use bluesky.

I prefer Mastodon, though.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

because bluesky wants to be a walled garden. they still operate under the same metrics as every other social media platform because their value comes from keeping you on the platform as much and as long as possible and tracking everything you do on it. they can't do that if you aren't logged in and views from external users aren't as valuable as logged in users.

mastodon doesn't care about any of that. it works off the principles of the open internet.

[–] max@europe.pub 37 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 73 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Here's the thing.

looks around

Hmmmm, yeah. That's what I thought. Everyone here is the wrong audience to really comment on this.

The reason peoples opinion here doesn't matter much is because like it or not, Lemmy is a hive mindset.

Don't like linux? Booooooo

Don't care about open source? Boooooo

Don't engage in antisocial behavior? Boooooo

And thats the audience here. It's impossible for you to comment on the mental state of the general broad population when this site seemingly collects an audience that goes out of their way to stay away from the broad general population. How could you possibly relate to someone like my brother in law, who uses Windows 11, without issue? I asked him how he can stsnd all the AI, and the spying. I was expecting an actual answer, and maybe some insight as to how to not make Windows 11 the dumpster fire that it is. Instead, he defends Windows 11 with blind faith ignorance. Insisting that there is no spying in Windows 11, and the AI is actually a good thing.

And I watched as an entire room nodded along in understanding. All agreeing with these points. I realized in that moment that there is zero conversation to be had with these people. I know for fact that Windows 11 spies on you. I know for fact that there is AI in Windows 11. It's easy to see that if left at its current rate, that AI and data centers that support AI will inevitably lead to mass water shortages.

And I'm confident that these words would land harder here on Lemmy, where I think 99% of you understand the gravity and real nature of what I'm saying.

The problem is, 99% of Lemmy's typical userbase accounts for 0.01% of the general population. This website is a bubble. Which is a shame, because I fully believe the model for Lemmys infrastructure is the cure for the problems that the general population complain about.

But it'll never be tested at scale. Most people do not give a fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck about privacy, or open source, or decentralization. Facebook knows my phone number, and has photos of me. Against my consent. And my mom who's in her 80s, who uses facebook to keep in touch with her sewing community, sees nothing wrong here.

Thats why the people here, who only support mastodon, will never understand why that stratagy won't work for the masses. And honestly, even if it did, then it wouldn't work for you.

Because twitter has something like 375 million users. When taylor swift wants to promote something, she does it on twitter. Because it's where the people are. It's also a right wing agenda platform, owned by a literal seig hailing nazi, but yet its still the default service regardless if you're left or right. It's just where the people are.

Here is what you have done. You saw an ocean. You took note of all the problems fish have in the ocean. You then designed a new concept where fish can swim in a tiny little manufactured pond. But if it gets too small, it can be scaled bigger. You removed the threats of being eaten. You've removed the fishing boats. You managed the algae. You planted seaweed so they have food. You installed everything a fish needs to have a happier healthier life from your perspective.

Except there's no water in this pond. The fediverse concentrates so hard on the advanced features that would make for a great experience.......and then forgets the basics that are needed to support life here. Social media only survives when it has an audience, just as fish only survive when they have water.

All the advanced stuff that goes unused in the fediverse means nothing without an audience. Basically if bluesky dies, the users go back to twitter.

You complain that mastodon is better. But bluesky only got popular because the general population didn't want twitter with nazis. They wanted old twitter. Bluesky is old twitter without the nazis. Thats all they wanted. But it's only got a tiny fraction of the audience twitter has. So again, taylor swift says her things on twitter. Not bluesky. Not enough people on bluesky to be considered the default. Just like the fediverse can't keep fish surviving without water, the same is true on bluesky.

The order it goes is that celebrities need to say things to hold an audience. Before the internet, that platform was tv/radio. There were also a lot less celebrities. Because tv/radio just didn't have a need to create more celebrities. But now, a celebrity can either get their message across to 375 million, or 14 million.

Celebrities go where there is an infrastructure that can handle their fame, and the audience goes where the celebrities go. Below that are us. We're not the 14 million. Lemmy has 60k and shrinking. But for us the order goes "infrastructure THEN audience". Which is never going to pull in a huge audience. It can support a large audience. Argueably better. But it'll never be tested.

[–] folekaule@lemmy.world 62 points 6 days ago (6 children)

You make some good points, but you're making the same mistake you're accusing your audience of making: you don't understand why people are on the platform they are on.

I can't speak for everyone, so I'll just speak for myself: I'm not on Lemmy and Mastodon because I want them to become the next Facebook--even if it were some kind of libre utopia free of commercial interests.

I'm here because these weirdos are my weirdos and they like the same weird things I like. It's a small enough sandbox that I can still recognize people here and there. These people have similar interests to me, and they post long, insightful rants about stuff that my family and other friends would not care about. The network effect is working in my favor.

The fediverse community feels more like home to me than the big social platforms. This feels more like it's my community. If Lemmy gets as big as Reddit, I'll probably go somewhere else.

I don't use Linux because I want it to dominate the world. I don't care if others use Linux or not. I use Linux because my computer finally feels like it's mine again. I do what I want with it and I don't have to worry about AI running or spying happening on it without my knowledge. As a bonus, it runs smoother.

The tradeoff is there are a few rough edges, and I have to learn some new things. But I enjoy learning. Lots of people don't enjoy having to learn new things to just veg out with IG or YouTube. I get that. So, then don't. Veg out with Windows, if that's your thing. We can all do our own thing at the same time.

Choice is a good thing. Small communites are good. Decentralized is good because then big bullies can't come in and take your community away. Small size and fragmentation are features, not bugs.

If Taylor Swift wants to set up her own Mastodon instance, she can. If she wants to cross-post between that and X, she can. I won't be seeking out her content and it will be trivial for me to stay in my bubble without Taylor algorithmically popping up inside of it like she is on IG, FB, and X.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 14 points 6 days ago

Every last god damn word of this. Well said.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 12 points 6 days ago

Choice is a good thing. Small communites are good. Decentralized is good because then big bullies can't come in and take your community away. Small size and fragmentation are features, not bugs.

Would be nice if the Fediverse had more of that.

There are three or four different "Technology" communities. But there might as well just be one, it's the same bubble in each of them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

but we can pump water over here! Hans! bring the industrial pumps!

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Honestly I personally, selfishly, hope Lemmy never gets anywhere near Facebook or Twitter huge.

Most people are fucking boring idiot assholes, full of actually boring and stupid ideas and opinions they only think are clever or notable because them and their social circle are broadly ignorant and hypnotized by marketing.

I prefer a smaller community where people at least tend toward not being idiots, and not being boring.

I don't want to hear from a celebrity, as their celebrity self.

I don't want advertising to be viable.

You are right; most people do not care about things that they should, if they actually believed half the things they say they do. Most people are enormously massive hypocrites about most things, whether theyre aware of that or not.

I am under no illusion that people, broadly, when freely handed the solution to a large chunk of their problems, will use it, if it means they suffer any kind of inconvenience whatsoever.

I am under no illusion that most people want what they claim they want; they just want to be popular, or be where the most other people are.

If Bluesky dies and the users go back to Twitter, they never believed in anything more than 'I want to be part of the herd.'

What you identify as a lack of water, I see as a functioning primary filtration system that prevents microplastic infected water from coming in to the system.

Keep Lemmy Weird.

I also find it odd that you would likely describe all that as anti-social.

... having preferences for the kind of people you enjoy socializing with... is not anti social. You seem to be functionally saying that not starting a massive marketing drive, that in itself is anti social.

This to me is either completely insane, or you don't understand what 'anti-social' means.

The corporate paradigm for social media... that is anti-social. 'Demonstrates a chronic pattern of disregarding the rights and well-bring of others.' They literally act as fine-tuned personalized, digital drugs to manipulate your thoughts and emotions, by exploiting your weaknesses.

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

If Bluesky dies and the users go back to Twitter, they never believed in anything more than ‘I want to be part of the herd.’

  • If ATproto (I migrated to Blacksky last year when Bsky made an unpopular ToS change) dies, I also have a Mastodon account I've been active on lately although my Mastodon account predates my ATproto account by a couple years, that I'll happily move to full time, I killed my Twitter months ago because I wasn't even active on there anymore anyways plus the baggage associated with that platform now, and I don't plan on setting another one back up.
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hell yeah, new copypasta just dropped!

Really though, you speak some truth, but it seems like you make the case for breaking up monopolies. Of course the current political environment in the US wouldn't allow that, but you've identified winner take all. I disagree about whether it's inevitable or does it take continual coersive action to stomp out that competition?

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It should have never been allowed for Facebook to take over WhatsApp and Instagram or Google taking over YouTube... It's the opposite of what capitalism should be according to people who defend it: allowing such mega monopolies destroys the few benefits the free market has to offer. It stunts innovation and encourages enshittification and anti consumer vendor lock-in behaviour

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 20 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I tried Bluesky. I noticed two overwhelming trends that led to my hasty departure:

Wishful thinking left-wing politics. Encouraging people to pretend like how things ought to be is how things are, and to act accordingly. This is lazy and disastrous thinking, both because it overlooks the real systemic change that needs to happen to get to where you want to be. Though, in fairness, there is quite a bit of this on Lemmy too.

Extremely popular poster who spent their entire careers making the Trump presidency a certainly trying to back pedal on Trump specifically. No mention of their awful ideas they still keep and spread that lead to such an outcome. Lots of thumbs up and people saying "see, they get it" while also not connecting the dots, as if Project 2025 fell from the sky and wasn't the product of decades of effort.

It's an idiot convention.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (6 children)

I find it rather strange you say this. Bluesky was on the receiving end of a major artist exodus from Twatter. With them came all the progressive ideals that they're known for. A lot of gay, trans, and otherwise queer individuals who are either artists themselves or follow artists they feel safe with. Certainly not the kind of people who are satisfied with the status quo.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

So, exactly like Twitter. The problem is not the platform, the problem is people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

Amen.

liberal/left can't seen to understand why they keep losing... but then makes no legit effort to like have a actionable plan for any of their political goals.

And if you suggest such actions/plan/pragmatic thinking, you're basically voted off the liberal 'happy think only' island.

I've been left-wing I feel like for 25 years, but the entire time I left the politics was moving away from me. As much as the right parodies the left as being elitist and out of touch and delusional... it's like the left now actively embraces that vision of themselves and actively pursues it.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 5 days ago

Here in Brazil, during our dictatorship, we had a 2-party system, ARENA, the "yes" party and MDB, which was the "yes sir" party. Feels like USA isn't too far off

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I recently discovered wafrn, which is fediverse software that lets you directly interact with both the Fediverse and Bluesky.

Also it has lots of fun easter eggs like this button in the settings

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca 35 points 6 days ago (8 children)

There is a considerable number of users that stopped using Bluesky because of the Age Verification. I think that is playing a significant issue, along with corporate accounts being few and far between compared to Twitter. I really liked how it was set up vs my Mastodon and Twitter account I keep for contests and giveaways. It is a shame they had to go fascist like that.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] noahm@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (7 children)

I’ve actually seen quite a few people and organizations moving back to Twitter. While these are just a few anecdotes, I suspects there’s a trend. I can’t explain it.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There is no functional difference between Bluesky and Twtitter. At least Mastodon is decentralized

[–] noahm@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Something that clearly doesn’t resonate with mainstream social media users at all.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm just don't really find the Twitter experience to be all that much use. I was never a big Twitter user anyway.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My town has a bulletin board posted adjacent to the sidewalk near the post office. It's labeled "The Town Cryer" and fliers for local events, businesses etc. get posted there.

That is what I see the Twitter/microblog format as useful for. It's for stand up comics and musical acts to post "come see us LIVE at the Somewhere Dome in Citytown This Saturday a 8/7c." Or for ISPs to post "Service interruption in the Carolinas, repairs underway, expect service to resume at 9 pm."

Other than that and it's just All Old Men Yell At Cloud.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That is crazy I'm not going back to twitter.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 days ago

Yes, go forward to Mastodon.

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I gave Bluesky a shot and didn't really like it. This might have to do with how I never liked Twitter before or after the rebranding.

I do think the branding is way better than mastodon though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] missingno@fedia.io 22 points 6 days ago

I really don't trust BlueSky. I feel like they call themselves federated as a marketing gimmick to convince people they're better than every other corporate social network, but they've deliberately set it up so that 99.9% of everything is going through their central server anyway. And it frustrates me that a lot of people have bought into that lie. Fediverse has been here delivering on everything BlueSky promised to be and did so long before BlueSky even existed, and yet no one cares because BlueSky had the venture capital to push a bigger marketing campaign.

Unfortunately, people jumping ship from BlueSky still aren't coming over here. So I don't know what to make of this news really, I know it doesn't mean what I wish it would mean.

[–] arararagi@ani.social 10 points 6 days ago (7 children)

They keep banning japanese artists, let that app rot.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 12 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I still love Bluesky. Mastodon has never even got off the ground and X is the biggest shit hole on the planet. Where else am I gonna go? There is no alternative.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

No one should be using corporate social networks.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, most people wouldn't even understand what that means. And many wouldn't care. People don't seem to care about things, even as those things chew them up.

Getting peers on board is probably the way to go.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrOtingocni@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (6 children)

I tried Bluesky before I found Lemmy. I really wanted to like it but after a few months I decided it wasn't for me. It's got a chicken-or-egg problem and you need to bring your own fanbase if want to have any interaction.

I never liked Twitter and don't feel it's a particularly good model for actual socializing. I think it was created back when people were still hacking together ideas, it sort of worked, and it hasn't changed much since.

It's great for disseminating stuff, terrible at creating space for discussion.

The founders seem like a bunch of young ultra-capitalists who sensed an opening in the market and are just shooting their shot. The app reflects this in subtle ways.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] bandanawearingbanana@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Xitter is loosing users too. So where are people going? Threads?

Or is the format becoming less relevant?

[–] eicker@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (5 children)

»TikTok« aka vertical short video. Even Loops is growing! - But yes, also Threads, Reddit etc.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

could be because dont allow post edits or dislikes

load more comments
view more: next ›