this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
221 points (100.0% liked)

News

38679 readers
2094 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 4 minutes ago

He has a legal right to respond the way that he did. Are they saying that you can longer take the 5th?

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Rand Paul's witch hunt continues to waste everyone's time.

It's not like he wants to improve people's material conditions. He's a theater kid

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 24 points 9 hours ago

It was a damned if he did, damned if he didn't set up. The GOP are going to prosecute him no matter what. He knew that. Everyone watching knew that. GOP for sure knows that. They were looking for any trivial thing that they could possibly use as cover but whatever it was, they were going to use it to try to charge him and now they have done so. If he had answered every question they would have found some sentence that wasn't 100% the exact same as a previous time and used that to charge him instead. It is really making Americans look as stupid as imaginably possible and after decades of North Korea drama, that is something.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So what is it when all the Trump administration lie and say that don't recall to every question? Or just don't answer at all? Or yell about the DOW for some reason?

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 14 minutes ago

This new made up standard only applies to people not Republican. Republicans will be allowed to continue to pull bullshit.

[–] siravious@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This is truly the land of fuck you. It’s a race to the bottom to see who can be the biggest asshole.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 2 points 27 minutes ago

Ask the world and you will find out that it always has been like that, you are just realizing that now with trump.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If we have another pandemic it will kill millions. Luckily it will mostly kill those like these senate dipshits. Unfortunately it will kill a lot of innocent people with it.

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 32 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The fuck it will. Everyone of these senate assholes would throw a baby off a cliff to be first in line to get the vaccine when it becomes available. They wont risk themselves one bit but will pay lip service to "freedom" to ignore all public safety warnings

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 1 points 2 hours ago

RFK junior sounding like apple sauce flowing from a car's exhaust pipe

"I beg to differ."

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 154 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Dutifully serve your country and try to mitigate an ongoing disaster because of your boss. Treated like shit by a third of the population.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 75 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

good luck finding another scientist to take responsibility like this ever again.

[–] kewjo@lemmy.world 62 points 19 hours ago

that's kind of the point

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 117 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

To be clear the vote was along party lines and was about him excersising his rights under the fifth amendment. So just to be clear the republicans are not just derelict in their duty to impeach the president do to his violations of the constitution but they are directly violating it themselves.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

In other news: Water is wet.

And people will now debate whether water can actually be wet or not.

[–] DementedSociety@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Well technically wet itself isn't wet, it makes things wet... Oh wait. I'll fuck off.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 66 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Instead of helping people buy food or dealing with the Epstein papers.

Fuck off government

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 32 points 17 hours ago

Fuck off *pedophiles/GOP

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 67 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Contempt of Congress for what? Exercising his right not to incriminate himself?

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago

It wasn't to not incriminate himself, it's not playing into their bullshit games that they've already decided he's lost.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 27 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Why? What are they trying to blame Fauci for?

[–] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 25 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

They're saying he helped fund China's bioengineering lab which ended up developing covid 19, and since he has said "my lawyer has advised me not to respond to those questions" as they try to pigeonhole him into whatever they can twist as his fault, they try to hold him in contempt for not answering.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Jesus christ, they're serious conspiracy nuts in charge looking for a scape-goat.

I got parents who believe in conspiracy bullshit, and you just can't have a reasonable argument with that level of stupid. Literally anything you say that isn't in line with their ideology will either be turned into something in line or rejected as a lie or just being brainwashed.

"No comment" is the most reasonable and none-time-wasting response you can give.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

In the words of Dan Olson, "they are trying to build a flat Earth".

[–] yogurt@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Rand Paul thinks China genetically engineered covid and released it to sap Aryan bodily fluids. But the oriental brainpan is incapable of biochemistry, so he thinks Fauci is the white that did it for them.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Rand Paul is a cynical, lying cunt who is unlikely to actually believe any of the bullshit he spouts. He just thinks his idiot constituents will fall for his conspiracy horseshit.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

Doesn't matter. They're looking for a witch to distract from Trump's assorted crimes.

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 47 points 19 hours ago

Can we do the Doj next then for failing to release all the Epstein files as legally obligated by Congress and failing to answer why?

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 48 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Poor guy was screwed either way. It was a no-win situation for him.

If he answered the questions they would have demonized him for his answers and prosecuted him on some bullshit charges.

If he pleaded the fifth (which he did) they would have demonized him for that. And prosecuted him for contempt.

And the whole argument that he has a pre-emptive pardon from Biden is bullshit. This administration - with the judicial system firmly in their pocket - will find a way to dismiss that if they need to.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 hours ago

Pardons can only be retrospective: they can only cover past events. So Biden (or any president) cannot pardon someone for a contempt charge that relates to a court appearance that happened after that president left office. So no chicanery required.

But the notion that you can be held in contempt of Congress for pleading the Fifth is insanely unjust. Which is not to say that the corrupt Supreme Court wouldn't uphold it.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 32 points 17 hours ago

This is quite literally the entire reason the 5th amendment exists, in the first place. If someone is trying to trap you into incriminating yourself, you have every right to simply not play along.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 45 points 19 hours ago

I mean, the prosecutor (?) admitted it on Fox News that they're trying to trap him into perjuring himself... the whole thing should've been shut down at that very point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 31 points 20 hours ago (8 children)

This is the entire problem with pre-emptive pardons and why it's fucked up whether it's Joe Biden or trump handing them out:

The pardon from Biden covered acts from 2014 through the January 2025 day it was issued. It does not shield Fauci from state-level prosecutions or from investigations into any testimony that he did give that lawmakers thought was false.

It's been fucked since Nixon got the first one over 50 years, and clearly if we don't do anything about, it's going to keep being a problem.

All this shit does is tell every single American:

The justice system is corrupt at the highest levels, but rather than attempt to fix the system, the powerful will just take care of each other and leave everyone else to fend for themselves.

Even if people don't realize that, that's what they hear. And it has a large effect on a populace and is usually the clearest sign a society has already failed.

When everyone believes the system is corrupt, they stop caring about what's right and only caring about if they can get away with something.

It's the root cause of why shit is so fucked up and everyone is so selfish.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

General pardons are far older than Nixon. The infamous (because its dicta are so often misinterpreted as precedent) Garland case in 1866 addressed their legality, in the context if a ruling on general pardons.

The root cause of the lack of trust in the judicial system is corruption, not specifically pardons. Any executive or judicial power, corruptly used, undermines confidence in the system.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 23 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, there are many reasons to be contemptuous of the Congress.

[–] Patrikvo@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

It's the "I'm Spartacus" scene, but with "contemptuous of Congress"

load more comments
view more: next ›