this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2026
199 points (98.5% liked)

Europe

11708 readers
1183 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 105 points 1 day ago (1 children)

124 Hydrokinetic units in the Sankt Goar swarm. Three running now, 21 in the next phase.

Three. They switched on three.

[โ€“] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world -4 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I am going to leap to the conclusion that you have never been a part of commissioning a major infrastructure project

[โ€“] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 54 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The headline says 124. Commissioning aside, that's misleading.

[โ€“] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 33 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You're correct in that assumption, but no matter how complex an undertaking it is, I don't think that really justifies putting false information in the title. They simply haven't switched on 124 turbines.

[โ€“] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 69 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Next post just below this one: Rhine river near Cologne at record low.

[โ€“] plyth@feddit.org 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Will there be enough water for ships on the Rhine once they activate all 124 turbines?

/s

[โ€“] mrmisses@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Those poor whales -trump

[โ€“] chaitae3@lemmy.world -1 points 20 hours ago

There's little use for these in summer anyway

[โ€“] HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org 11 points 18 hours ago

There is also the Pelamis Wave Power Technology.

The company which developed it was bought by E.ON and shut down. But seems like China has copied it (there are several articles in The Guardian about that), and continues to develop it because it is a superb principle.

[โ€“] Mihies@programming.dev 22 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

So, like very hydro power plants, just with a lot less power and geographical impact.

[โ€“] teddypolice@feddit.org 21 points 22 hours ago

Also, a lot cheaper because you don't need literally thousands of tons of steel reinforced concrete.

Which also cuts down on the carbon footprint of the energy generated.

[โ€“] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 4 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Also probably not useful in a decade because Europe is drying out. We're seeing droughts hitherto unfathomable.

[โ€“] stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

We're gonna get more rain in the winter and less in the summer according to a climate scientist that I follow on bsky. This is a good project even if our summers are getting drier. The sooner we leave fossil fuels behind, the better.

[โ€“] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 17 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

It's not just about the missing summer rain, but about the glaciers vanishing. The Rhine comes from the Swiss alps. We'll get torrential rainfalls and then droughts.

What I mean to say is instead of a nice constant water flow we'll have way too much, then way too little.

Climate change is such a bitch.

[โ€“] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Build a dam where the glaciers were? Also doesn't desroy much there, unlike dams further down.

[โ€“] OhmeHose@feddit.org 5 points 18 hours ago

Won't work, not only because what the other dude said. But also because the alps are getting unstable. The permafrost keeping the mountain tops glued together is slowly melting away, making mud slides and other unpleasant sudden destruction events likelier every year.

If you wanna go ski in the alps do it soon, they will change their looks in the next decade(s).

[โ€“] leagman1@feddit.org 4 points 22 hours ago

Thou preachest!

[โ€“] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 2 points 23 hours ago

They'd still shred some fish, no?

[โ€“] poVoq@slrpnk.net 1 points 23 hours ago

Mostly less impact on important shipping routes.

[โ€“] Dadifer@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They invented water wheels.

[โ€“] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 11 points 22 hours ago

more efficient waterwheels

....but yeah, theyre basically waterwheels.

[โ€“] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Ahh the gap that folks like Trump talk about that isn't significant at all.

The gap is already solved with batteries, chemical and mechanical batteries.

[โ€“] chaitae3@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Salt. The condiment basil and thyme never could replace.

[โ€“] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

This reads like a marketing release for the startup that makes them. If they work well long term, aren't overly expensive, and don't cause too much environmental damage, great. But maybe link a source that does more than just reprint a sales pitch.

[โ€“] gressen@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago
[โ€“] Gamechanger@slrpnk.net 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Has been done before, has failed. But in principle a good idea. If i remember correctly could provide 3% of electricity.

[โ€“] Pip@feddit.org 13 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Ah yes, this is how innovation works. Try once and it it fails, stop there.

[โ€“] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Pack it up boys.

[โ€“] Gamechanger@slrpnk.net 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Thats for sure not what i said, I like the idea and gave some context and additional information. Which is wrong, for some reason...

[โ€“] Pip@feddit.org 2 points 15 hours ago

Okay, sorry.

[โ€“] RobotToaster@mander.xyz -1 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

That looks like a navigation hazard?

[โ€“] muelltonne@feddit.org 17 points 21 hours ago

Totally. It's Germany and therefore everybody can install stuff in a major waterway without any regulation. The company also installed them in the middle of the river where all ships are going in order to sink them.

[โ€“] leagman1@feddit.org 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They probably ignored navigation when planning and then installing these. It will be a great oopsie

[โ€“] Vincent@feddit.nl 15 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah it's very likely that the first thing that came into some Lemmings' minds was completely overlooked in the extensive planning process that precedes projects like this.

[โ€“] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, completely overlooking obvious faults in the planning process has happened plenty of times.

[โ€“] Vincent@feddit.nl 2 points 3 hours ago

I mean, yeah, can't argue with that.