this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2026
211 points (99.5% liked)

Political Humor

2079 readers
269 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

stolen from *eddit

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

i dont understand why there are deadlines for things like this that you can plan around and easily game in the government. like, what's keeping them from having an election at any time anyway?

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 1 points 56 minutes ago

Logistical concerns based on horse and buggy era thinking.

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 1 points 58 minutes ago* (last edited 56 minutes ago) (1 children)

Mitch surviving, or faking being alive, until 12:01 a.m. to run out the clock as one last FU to democracy would be extremely on brand.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

Obstructionist to the end.

[–] procrastitron@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

McConnell probably is still alive.

Yes, they’re clearly lying about the severity of his condition, but even if he’s brain dead he could be kept on life support and that would be enough to prevent the senate seat from being vacant.

If they did just wait until August 4 to turn off life support thinking it keeps the seat vacant, that would most likely backfire though.

In that scenario the governor could name a replacement immediately because the special election law was ruled unconstitutional.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

And they're going to get away with it.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 28 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Andy Beshesr is a failure. He could have pressed the issue but he wrote a letter and refused to be persistent.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yup, and his performative nonsense is going to make sure he gets to stay in the presidential race. Fucking sickening.

I wonder what they have on these governors. This comes on the heels of Colorado's governor just letting a literal traitor get off scot-free.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 23 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

This is just a fact.

If the Democrats weren't cowards they would do something about it.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If Americans werent lazy cowards this wouldnt be a problem to begin with.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

If the whole world would stop trading with the lazy coward's dollar it wouldn't be such a big problem, now would it? You should be able to make it on your own without lazy coward money and finance!

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

This is the truth. If the dollar weren’t propping up everything and the world economy diversified, the US would quickly become part of the third world.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Didn’t Lindsey grahams sister just assume his position? So why doesn’t Mitch’s wife just assume his?

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I believe the rules vary from state to state. I had heard the special election thing was pushed for Kentucky by McConnell himself.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yup, the "rules". Sacred, unbreakable, sacrosanct rules and norms.

Donald has been good for one thing, demonstrating that all the excuses Dems made about norms and rules were just cover for not giving a shit.

Really wish we could elect a progressive that cares enough about stopping fascism to put a bullet in this absurd notion that we have to observe norms in the face of decidedly harmful and abnormal things, like people are living out of their cars and dying for lack fo health care, but that's just a daydream.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Lol rules. This guy is most likely dead and avoiding all the rules as it is. Why would it even matter what they did after? Clearly rules don't apply here anyway.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

The point of rules is to put up obstacles for the opposition, not yourself!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

This post is misinformation (no offense to OP; I'm sure it wasn't intentional).

The Republicans forced through a law requiring a special election and setting that deadline as described in the image, but the state constitution allows the governor to simply appoint a replacement. The law is unconstitutional and therefore null and void.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

I agree this whole controversy is attracting weird misinformation.

The state constitution gives the governor power to appoint replacements in the event of a vacancy.

The legislature passed a law in 2021 requiring the governor to choose an appointment from the list provided by the state party of the outgoing Senator's party.

Then, the legislature passed a law in 2024 prohibiting the governor from choosing a replacement at all, and requiring a special election as soon as possible, at least 56 days before the general election.

The governor has publicly stated his position that both laws are unconstitutional under the state constitution, and basically everyone believes that if McConnell's seat becomes vacant that he'll appoint a replacement as a Democrat.

McConnell's term expires at the end of this year, and the general election in November is already going to choose McConnell's full term replacement.

If both laws are unconstitutional: the fake deadline doesn't matter, because the governor can select a replacement without restrictions.

If only the 2024 law is unconstitutional (but the 2021 law is constitutional): hiding McConnell's death and delaying the vacancy is counterproductive for Republicans, because it just prevents the Republicans from filling McConnell's seat (where he's currently unable to vote) with a Republican who can vote.

If the 2024 law is constitutional: hiding McConnell's death and delaying the announcement doesn't do anything, because replacing a non-voting Senator with a vacancy doesn't change anything anyway, because the general election in November will determine who becomes Senator for the next term that starts on January 1.

Basically, the only way this date makes a difference is if it causes a special election to get the seat filled for the 3 months between September and December, and it's unclear which party would win that seat to basically tip the margin in the Senate up or down half a vote (and not enough to actually tip control of the Senate).

The timing of the Senate vacancy is a very low stakes issue, and doesn't clearly favor one party over the other.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure the law would have to be challenged in court, which would undoubtedly be appealed, and then go to the state supreme Court.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Who has already ruled against this same law in another case.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 hours ago

And yet the spineless fucking governor won’t appoint a replacement right now. It isn’t 4D chess, it’s just cowardice.

[–] kabe@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (5 children)

What I'm not altogether clear on is how keeping his seat empty benefits Republicans. Doesn't this mean that they are short one vote in the Senate?

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

It's not even an election, it's an appointment. Beshear would get to appoint a Senate seat.

The 2024 law taking that power away from him has already been ruled to violate Kentucky's constitution in another case.

[–] MattBlackAlien@lemmy.world 18 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

It avoids an election they are afraid of losing, which would leave them short one vote and the Democrats up one vote.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 7 points 7 hours ago

It also tests the waters for further ignoring the law and Democrats are so far failing to provide any deterance.

[–] kabe@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Ah, so the election would be bipartisan? That makes sense for the Republicans but doesn't then explain why the Democrats aren't demanding the election go ahead in his absence. The fucker is obviously dead.

I mean, I know the Dems often act as controlled opposition, but this is just embarrassing.

[–] TimboSlice@discuss.online 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Well...it is Kentucky we're talking about here. Not the biggest champions of democracy in this state.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

They know the score with an empty seat and it's still good enough.

They don't want to risk an unknown they didn't need to face.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

There's not one. This is all conspiracy nonsense.

All the answers are "because they're afraid to lose the seat to a democrat." In rural Kentucky? Get out of here with that nonsense.

The Occam's Razor answer is that he's just not dead. I'd bet the farm on it.

[–] kabe@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Given all the evidence by this point, Occam's Razor would suggest he is dead. Or comatose, at the very least.

[–] Nusm@peachpie.theatl.social 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

He's not physically dead because they're keeping him on life support and refuse to pull the plug until after August 3rd. He's likely been brain dead since they carried him out of his house on the stretcher.

I guarantee that there will be a "sad" announcement within 48 hours of August 3rd that McConnell has passed away peacefully.

[–] db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Stop spreading fake news please, we all know he has been brain dead a lot longer than that

[–] dracc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 11 hours ago

Better one neutral than one opposed, I guess.