this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
272 points (98.9% liked)

politics

30968 readers
1541 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

🎶knee deep in the Big Muddy, but the big fool said to push on.🎶

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Astronut@lemmy.zip 68 points 1 month ago (1 children)

M orons

A re

G overning

A merica!

[–] Janx@piefed.social 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, did you see some sort of leadership or governance? I must have missed it...

Morons
Are
Grifting
America

[–] Astronut@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

M ostof’m

A re

G od damn

A sses!

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ok, my turn:

B

O

B

A

D

D

Y

[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The power of your mega-wat is beyond my ability to comprehend. Stealing for future use.

Ok, I'll start.

Biznuss

O

B

O

D

D

Y

[–] artyom@piefed.social 35 points 1 month ago (2 children)

So we can...lose harder? What does he think is going to happen that hasn't already happened?

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (6 children)

The whole point was to close the straight and choke China off from resources, but they are pretending it was to overthrow the Iranian government. Perhaps Trump is not informed on the actual plan, kept out of the loop because he’s an idiot. You will see this war continue annd the straight will remain closed against all rationality, and Indonesia/Straight of Malacca is next. The Western aristocracy that is driving this war does not care about the economy, they do not care about fertilizer or petrochemicals or helium. They are insulated from the consequences. They only care about maintaining exclusive global “full spectrum dominance”, and they will kill every living thing on this planet to maintain that control.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Whatever the USA's plan was, clearly isn't having the effect on China and the rest of the world they would have imagined. China's transition to electrotech let them ride out the shock without taking a bite from reserves, and the relative trickle of oil they would continue to need, they get at a discount from Russia anyway. Europe, too, is adapting and roughing it out. The lack of helium might be the biggest issue worldwide.

I'd sooner believe incompetence over malice here, that the reason the talks to open the Strait aren't progressing is because Trump needs his sycophants to brief him on the whole situtation multiple times a week. I imagine he's forgotten anything he had done in prior weeks.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

China has substantial reserves and also as you mentioned has diversified their energy portfolio and constructed their domestic and foreign policy to be as self reliant as possible, but they are not impervious to sustained supply strain. Just keep an eye on Indonesia/Straight of Malacca. Interdiction of shipping in international waters. This phase is about maritime control.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think it's a neat theory, but unlike between the Mediterranean and Arabian, Malacca has many options: Singapore, Lombok, Ombai, around the top of Australia are all possible detours to get shipping through.

Nothing would suggest to me that the Indo-Pacific regional countries are looking to jettison UNCLOS just over yet another Middle East squabble. Of course the USA could make more stupid decisions on account of nothing, but we can cross that bridge when that happens. Blockading might be seen as an appropriate response if, say, China were to invade Taiwan or Philippines.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Hasn’t the U.S. already “jettisoned UNCLOS”??? It certainly seems like they are preparing to start boarding and seizing vessels, but yeah, we’ll see alright. I think it will be quite a spectacle.

https://www.marines.mil/Force-Design/

was to close the straight and choke China off from resources

I don't think that was the goal, I'm not even sure if that would really be effective as a secondary effect.

The Chinese are still able to buy petro chemicals from Russia at a discount, and they still have access to their largest import partners.

It's more believable to think trump did this partly as a favour to Israel, and partly as a favour to the American oil and gas industries, who has been the largest benefactor of the strait shutting down.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

That's an interesting take. Hmmm.

[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can China get Russian oil? Does Russian oil go through the Straight?

Everything I've heard points to us doing this for Israel.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Russia supplies approximately 20% of China's total crude oil imports, making it the single largest supplier of crude to the country. China imports roughly 70-75% of its total oil consumption.

  • Russia:≈ 20% - 22%

  • Saudi Arabia: ≈ 14% - 15%

  • Iraq: ≈ 11%

  • Iran: ≈ 12% - 13% (Volumes are largely sanctioned and often relabeled/transshipped through other nations like Malaysia).

  • United Arab Emirates: ≈ 7%

  • Oman: ≈ 6%

  • Other Countries (e.g., Malaysia, Brazil): ≈ 31% [12345]

[–] decolo@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Does it go through Hormuz though?

[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not being a jerk, but I don't understand how this addresses my question.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Russia only provides 20% of their oil

[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If push comes to shove, which it very well may, do you think that number could increase? I do.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Depends on how many drones hit what russian oil facilities.

[–] hogmomma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, everything's dependent on something (?).

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I kinda doubt this. Seems more like Israel needed a distraction while they annex their neighbors to build "Greater Israel" and they in many ways purchased and blackmailed their way to majority political equity in America.

Like maybe this is what some elements in Trump's regime want but as a grand concerted plan that even half his cabinet are aware of? Nah. It's a room full of sociopaths who all want to get theirs. So who in the admin do you think is trying to do this?

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don’t pay attention to what the assholes in the White House or Congress say, pay attention to what the assholes at Rand Corp and Brookings say.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago

I'd believe that's what they want but I doubt they'll pull it off.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

China only gets around 10% of its oil from Iran. Not sure how this is going to choke China.

I figured the whole point was one last MIC hurrah before the TIC takes over. Basically blow shit up and spend like there is no tomorrow because the Tech overlords need stability to bring about their new world order.

Also, most of the oligarchy is playing both sides (BRICS and G7) so it really doesn't matter. I think the emphasis on nations is holding people back from understanding what is really going on.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 month ago

Dude has never been 90 minutes into a Battle for Middle Earth 2 game with Sauron and 2 Balrogs summoned directly on your base.

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The article doesn't mention it, but how's that 60-day war powers window progressing? Aren't we getting well past that? Beginning was when? February 2026? That's 4 or 5 months, 120 to 150 days. If the rest of us respected the law similarly, we'd be living in the anarchy of a MadMax world.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You misunderstand. This is a completely new war, you see. Thus negating the limit

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Just realized why he's declared the war won every couple days.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

No comrade, this is special military operation, not war. You must understand this!

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can’t lose if you had no goal.

[–] bananabread@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 month ago

Now we know how he bankrupted casinos.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I'm going to laugh when this finally comes crashing into the one toothpick holding up the economy and GPU production stops because of supply chain disruptions.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's the thing about defeat. Whether you accept it or not, it still happens.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You're only defeated when you give up trying.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not really. You're defeated when the ref calls it whether you gave up or not.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

You may have an L, but you were never defeated.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah yeah the motto of the gambler

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

And all winners.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Won't be long now before we get boots on the ground and the grift starts demanding blood for the blood morons.

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let's just send his ass to Iran, and tell them to 'show him a good time'. Then make some popcorn

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is the surest way to obtain peace. We can just take the entire Whitehouse staff including AOTUS and hand them over to Iran for their war crimes.

And nothing of value would be lost.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The racist dipshit and drunk do not have an exit strategy and they will pass the shit sandwich to whoever wins the next election. In the meantime, get ready for a military draft.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

What this stupid cocksucker and his cronies don't realize is that defeat is coming hard and fast.

You can't wage war on an economy that has totally and entirely collapsed.

You can't wage war when you can't pay workers for the military industrial complex to afford basic necessities

You can't wage war when active duty soldiers' families start starving, and their service no longer pays for their food

And you can't wage war when every other country in the region has had enough of your shit and surrenders to Iran and agrees to remove your military bases, which is only a matter of time at this point.

[–] French75@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

He always accepts defeat, he just lies about being defeated and tells you he's brilliant.