this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2026
676 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

86469 readers
3889 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 58 points 6 days ago (3 children)

As soon as posts were no longer ordered by post date and time it was over for me.

[–] SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

SAME. Seeing posts from a week later it because a certain friend is shadow banned just ruined the whole experience.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com -3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

On reddit you can sort by “new”…

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Can't do shit on reddit anymore without being signed in with an account.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Jesus, that's a form of psychological abuse.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 days ago

Yup, I fought it for a while by clicking the appropriate tab or sort button, but they kept changing where it lives until I gave up and never logged on again.

Now it's just here for the community, and youtube for the consumption - at least they let you just look at your subscription by new without any junk mixed in (yet).

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

There's a certain merit to posts with high interactions getting a higher priority to posts that were sent more recently. I didn't enjoy the Facebook spam that started popping up as people gamed the system. 10,000 "Your friend is playing Fart Hospital! Your friend just pooped himself in Fart Hospital! Your friend has made an Epic Fart at Fart Hospital!" posts because someone didn't realize the game they were playing was posting to their feed.

But they got the Reddit disease, where engagement was everything. And then you started losing sight of media you cared about under a pile of Shrimp Jesus clickbait.

I think, at the end of the day, the Facebook internal metrics changed from "Are our users happy?" to "Are our users meth addicts?"

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 26 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Probably because it's been overtaken by exhausting far right narratives pushed by the companies themselves.

My Facebook page doesn't even show me stuff from people I actually know any more. One of my cousins had a baby, it didn't even show me that. Instead what it thinks I want to see are badly written posts about immigrants and "lefties" being to blame for everything, as if the UK government is left wing in any way at all...

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Yes the far-right astroturfing is becoming very blatant lately. I've noticed a recent worsening trend

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I may be wrong (I left the algorithmic social medias when they abandoned linear timelines [kept reddit until about a year before the exodus, since only fedi]) but:

Is that not because that is the content you interact with (argumentatively, likely, but still) or hover over longer with their eye movement sensors, or all the other ways they track you, and so they think "ahh he 'likes' (hate engages with) this content so send more!" in a loop to keep you engaged and keep making money for them through advertisements?

Like, if you ignored that shit (and iirc there's often a way to "reset" your algorithm in some settings, after all, they want the data they sell to be accurate, it's more valuable to sell...) and started only liking/lingering on family shit and cats (how can you ignore the kitties after all), they'd send primarily that, yes?

I could be wrong about that, this is my understanding as an outsider, but I'm curious. At the end of the day I'll forever advocate for the end of such algorithmic practices entirely long term, and the end of one's individual involvement with it in the present moment: "Bruh get off that shit it is rotting your brain. Like actually, by design, and it wants to keep you locked in. Don't look at the Basilisk."

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's some of that, on some platforms. Other platforms also get paid to promote posts or advertisement. Depending on who pays the most, you can see different things based on your demographics.
An important thing to remember is that they will show you something in the money making category. If they know what you want, they make more if they show you something that's likely to be effective. If they don't know what you want, they make more if they show you something targeting your demographic. If they're fuzzy on everything, they show you something.

Which political geographic is more likely to target Facebook? Which one is more likely to spend demographic money to try to court younger white men from a low to middle income bracket?

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Good to know.

Second question,

Which one is more likely to spend demographic money to try to court younger white men from a low to middle income bracket?

Are young people still on Facebook? I thought it was just "for boomers" now.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely no idea. I almost logged on when typing the previous reply to see if they were still offering me the "thin blue line commemorative gun holster" they were the last time I was on, but I realized I really didn't want to.

I feel like I see it being used as a common enough way for events to share details though, so it probably isn't just older demographics.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago

Idk, I don't use any of them, but I've definitely heard people say facebook is for the olds. I thought the kids had all moved to TikTok tbh.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I quit Facebook when I realized I was mostly seeing things I didn't want to see and it was making me like the people I knew less. That was like 15 years ago

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There's a (possibly apocryphal) story about Zuckerberg originally being very resistant to turning Facebook into another Yahoo or MySpace or similar ad-swamped interface, on the grounds that it would scare people away and create a drag on growth. It even got a send-up in The Social Network movie.

Whether this was an intentional business strategy or a second order effect, Facebook was originally one of the cleanest Web 2.0 sites. They did a genuinely pretty good job of focusing on media you were flagged as caring about and showing you activity of friends and family who you wanted to follow. More savvy early users even commented on how creepy Facebook could get, precisely because it could find your friends better than you could and bait you with interactions that drew people together.

The modern iteration of the company is so far away from what it was originally designed to be. The Shrimp Jesus clickbait era Facebook might as well make it a different website. I cannot imagine anyone seeing this site coming into college Freshman year and finding anything that makes it appealing.

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah, but there's still this:

Zuckerberg: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

Zuckerberg: Just ask

Zuckerberg: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

[Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?

Zuckerberg: People just submitted it.

Zuckerberg: I don't know why.

Zuckerberg: They "trust me"

Zuckerberg: Dumb fucks

Instant messages sent by Zuckerberg during Facebook's early days, reported by Business Insider (May 13, 2010)

[–] mangobanana@discuss.online 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The really shitty part is that I used to post my art on Instagram app the time and started to get a lot of followers, then they changed their system. Now I didn't get hardly any views.

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Oh hey, you can still get views! You just need to open an advertising account with them, and them pay them anywhere between $50-$1000 and they'll then show your one sponsored post to anywhere between 2 and 50 percent of people who like that kind of thing, for anywhere between 3 days and two weeks. Just select how much you want to spend to get that sweet exposure!

What's that? You want to reach all your friends and followers? All of them? For free? Sorry, they don't do that kind of thing anymore.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Only 45% more to go. We can do this guys!

[–] leriotdelac@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The algorithm ruined it for me. Insta was once so great to keep up and share updates with friends; I've no interest in interacting with strangers shoved down my throat unprompted.

I'm not.an American, but I'm sure the sentiment is universal!

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

You can unfollow everyone but your friends

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I’ve now realizing that these Tech giants have poisoned their entire well:

  • Want to make AR glasses? Cool! Oh… Uh, I guess we run a platform that handsomely pays pervs for engagement, so that’s not going to work.

  • Let’s start gaming services. Oh… why does no one want to make an account with us, or trust we will keep it running?

  • Generative models for creative media. Oh, uh… back to the AR glasses issue. And some others.

  • Ah, so our LLMs need to reference the web to be at their best which…. We… Kind of killed for a quick buck? Oops.

There are hundreds of examples of this.

And now? The whole reason people use these platforms is being consumed by cancer. Rapidly, from the feel of things.

I’m a cynic. I believe companies like Meta can carry on destroying people and getting away with it, no matter what, and users will be indifferent.

But now I’m starting to suspect they they have nowhere to pivot to, because they’ve burned the forest down.

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Most of my microblogging stuff has been just shouting in the void about stuff I've been doing. And random brainfarts. I follow cool people on social media so I can see them shout in the void about what they're doing. And their random brainfarts.

I'm happy Mastodon still lets me do just that. Perfect platform for that sort of stuff.

The Algo Lords decided people don't actually want to see that, they want "popular" things and engagement bait. Yeah no, not what I want.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

To be fair, engagement bait works.

Look how much Twitter ragebait gets upvoted here on Lemmy.

Whenever I go to check the source for the posts, they aren't even real; it's a bot account posting 24/7, or at the very least a dedicated engagement farmer. But people don't care, they just want that feeling.

[–] DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Status update: I am pooping

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nearly there!

[–] stumu415@lemmy.zip 178 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Not just America. It's a trend worldwide thanks to the abundance of AI slop taking over any 'social network'.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 123 points 1 week ago (6 children)

See also the privacy-invading aggressiveness of most platforms, and the political ads and propaganda inundating people’s feeds. If social media had just remained a way to keep in touch with friends and post pictures, it would probably have remained popular.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MantisToboggon@lemmy.world 100 points 1 week ago (23 children)

No one gives a shit what I ate for lunch.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 85 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I mean, I still post to social media every day, but it's pixelfed. It's not toxic, it's just me throwing in my art on the pile with everyone else's art that I also get to flip through and enjoy, in chronological posting order, with no advertisements or other subject matter present.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] CaffeinatedCubits@programming.dev 72 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dude they filled my timeline with a bunch of ads and AI generated nonsense. We stopped posting because no one ever saw it thanks to all of the filler.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was all over when Facebook introduced the algorithmic timeline. It's just taken a while for people to notice how awful it's made everything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] outerspace@lemmy.zip 62 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Back in the day, I posted on Instagram to share things with my friends and scrolled to see their updates. The chronological feed with no suggested posts was the only way it worked, and now that's impossible. There are no "people" on Instagram anymore.

[–] CentipedeHZ@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago

You can still get chronological posts on there if you tape the “Instagram” button at the top and tap followers instead of recommended. Not well labeled but still possible

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kboos1@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Because no one fing cares about your hourly updates and you're just advertising your insecurities.

Social media is 75% ads, 15% shared content (more ads), and 10% people you know creating actual posts. You're a gluten for punishment if you hang out there.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›