this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
773 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

86131 readers
3534 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“I can complain about Starlink raising their prices, but it’s the only genuine option we have,” former Nebraska state senator and Republican Julie Slama told the Washington Post last month. “Once they have rural customers on their service with no meaningful alternatives, they’re free to raise prices at will.”

Should we pull up the record and see who voted to allow that to happen in Nebraska while on the subject?

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 15 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

"We only have the option to use this hyper expensive private satellite service... because we spent all of the wired rollout grants/funding on bullshit."

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

because we spent all of the wired rollout grants/funding on bullshit.

Oh, it's worse than that. The grant money was the wrong party color, so it had to be disposed of rather than lead to a positive outcome.

[–] SparroHawc@piefed.world 2 points 14 hours ago

But you see, if they took the grant money and used it for something that people liked, they'd have to admit that the party they don't like did something useful! Can't have that!

[–] himmyguap@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago

You should only be a Starlink customer if you have no other feasible choice.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 2 points 15 hours ago

Ah great. My Starlink hardware just arrived.

I wasn't charged any high-demand surcharge though. I probably wouldn't have ordered it if I had to pay one of those.

I don't think my area will have high demand for Starlink anyway. Even their fastest options are slow. There are options for like 5-10x the speed around the same price in my area. The only downside: There's like a 50% chance of lightning frying my modem each year, and it takes like a week to get a tech on site.

Starlink is a great backup connection. It's cheap to just keep in standby mode (~$15/month, IIRC). An unexpected, heavy surcharge might be a deal breaker though

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"I can complain about Starlink raising their prices, but it's the only genuine option we have," former Nebraska state senator and Republican Julie Slama told the Washington Post last month. "Once they have rural customers on their service with no meaningful alternatives, they're free to raise prices at will."

Yes, that is what everyone has been warning about for years and why we want the communication monopolies torn down... Fucking leopards running loose out here eating faces and they still just kinda shrug and go "wish there was an alternative to letting all the leopards run free eating our faces".

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To be fair, if you've ever had to use HughesNet, a leopard eating your face is a welcome change of pace.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 hours ago

Goddamn HughesNet. I had vehicle dealerships on that fucking piece of shit for their parts system and payroll. What a horrible service, for thousands of dollars a month.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

We've noticed that our service no longer works properly, so we're going to charge you more for it.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago

Sending money to a clown and NOT expecting a fucking circus, are we?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 10 points 23 hours ago

"High demand" meaning underprovisioning.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 7 points 22 hours ago

This is sooo on cue, right as my AI loving IT colleagues are talking about getting starlink, only to have a backup internet connection in case of an outage.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (9 children)

The country that invented the internet... has the worst internet infrastructure in the developed world. Worse than some developing countries too. Astonishing.

astonishing

No, its pretty in character.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

How could someone who knows all about computers and networking not predict the logistics problems for such projects? /s

Musk tweet from 3 years ago: "Have you ever wondered why the Wikimedia Foundation wants so much money?It certainly isn't needed to operate Wikipedia. You can literally fit a copy of the entire text on your phone!So, what's the money for? Inquiring minds want to know ..."

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The world's first trillionaire doesn't get to call anyone else greedy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That tweet is almost impressively stupid.

What the fuck does the download size of Wikipedia have to do with anything?

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can also fit some of the largest LLMs on my phone. Where is all that AI investment going to???

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ddplf@szmer.info 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

I just can't imagine having such excessive wealth and not saying "eh, whatever" when someone tells me I'm losing money on some internet fees.

You fucker, you could make the world at least a tiny bit better for billions of people at virtually no expense to you, but you just keep playing your stupid fucking rich manchildren games with your billionaire parasite buddies.

Keep grinding bro, maybe this way you'll get used to the feeling of having your bones crushed in the grinder.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

It makes more sense when you realize his wealth is all smoke and mirrors based on a shared lie.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You don't get that wealthy in the first place by not gobbling up every fucking penny you have a chance to. You think he's just going to take the dub and stop?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Maggie@thelemmy.club 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Poor Elon, down to his last Trillion

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grandma@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 day ago (9 children)

America will do anything except lay some fucking cable to provide internet to the ruroids.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Including paying companies specifically to lay that cable then never forcing them to actually do it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I have a neighbor who has access to 1gb cable and 1gb fiber from two ISP's. Both have high data caps. Instead he is rocking the starlink and I can't for the life of me figure out how he thinks that shit is somehow better than a hard link.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›