this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
608 points (98.3% liked)

Games

49404 readers
2187 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As far as publishers are concerned, the single greatest cancer they face is the resale market. When a store sells a new game for £60, the publisher makes about £20, and the store gets between £15-20, depending on how they choose to price it. The rest is the cost of manufacturing and shipping. (These are rounded estimates, it varies)

Then, a week later, when someone trades that game in and the store resells it for $40, they get all of that, and the publisher gets nothing.

From their perspective, that's basically theft, which is why they've been trying for decades to put a stop to it, which they can't, or at least make more money from secondary sales by bundling single-use codes for "bonus" content that really should be part of the main game, which people who buy preowned will have to shell out extra for.

So that's what getting rid of physical media is all about. If they get rid of the discs and cartridges, that market vanishes.

Please don't mistake this explanation as an excuse. All of the platform holders have had the means to kill off the retail market and usher customers onto their digital storefronts for at least a decade. All they had to do was pass on even a fraction of the savings they make selling digitally, which cuts out the manufacturing, shipping, and retailer costs, onto the customer. But they haven't. Games cost the same on the Playstation Store as they do on the Gamestop Shelf. Sometimes more!

They could have used the carrot, but pure greed means they're now opting for the stick.

Edit, Supplemental Question: This is my first post on Lemmy, and the responses have me wanting to clarify something- Is everyone on this platform fucking mental?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

When I was young we used rent games from the stores. Just sayin

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 7 hours ago

This is about removing any and all ownership rights of buyers.

Not just of selling you copy second hand but also things like lending (even to your own family), gifting and even playing it in a different device

Mandatory Age Checks on the device also helps with stopying lending even to members of your family that live with you and use the same device to play the game: if the hardware (with the excuse of Age Checking) identifies the user, then the copy can be bound to a specific person in a specific devive rather than the device alone, so for example two siblings in the same household need to buy two copies to play it even at different times rather than just one copy as the "age check" identifies the user and only allows a specific user for a specific copy.

The fewer rights buyers de facto have, the more copies publishers sell as users can't get the games by alternative legal means, and whilst at first there might be some backlash from taking those rights away, in my experience not only are most gamers sheeple or at best dogs that bark a lot but don't bite, but usually they over time get used to not having those rights (especially as new, younger people, who grew up without having had them become gamers), so pretty much all backlash from taking those rights away eventually dissapears and those companies end up making more money than before.

[–] amgine@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

In regards to your edit: lemmy is quickly becoming an echo chamber of extreme pov’s and hot takes. You take the Reddit refugees and the Reddit banned users but leave the major casual users behind you get a lot of opinionated reactionary people in a relatively small place. Combine that with independently ran and lightly moderated servers.

I’ve been here for a while and at risk of sounding typical and repetitive of users of other platforms, it’s becoming shitty.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I honestly think every single platform that uses a vote score system is inherently susceptible to becoming an echo chamber.

The only value a vote score generates is consensus and IMO it's not worth the cost.

Vote scores influence readers before they even engage the content. It lowers the bar of participation, partly by removing the necessity of commenting approval/disapproval, and secondarily by making approval/disapproval anonymous.

Ultimately it makes it easier for people to participate without actually contributing. It equates thoughtful with thoughtless engagement that lowers the quality of the end result.

[–] amgine@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I agree. I think hacker news does it well. No downvotes and upvotes are publicly hidden.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

I could see vote score being a valuable moderation tool on the backend.

[–] Erna_muse@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Switch to pc. Walled gardens are inherently problematic.

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

While usually good advice, that is a pretty tone deaf thing to say to someone complaining specifically about the death of physical media.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 12 points 12 hours ago

they want us to pay constantly, forever.

it will not stop unless its stopped.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 28 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Is everyone on this platform fucking mental?

Many people here are. People will lash out over the smallest thing. There are a lot of cool people too, but I highly advise using the block feature liberally. The jerks can really be a buzzkill as they truly love to judge your entire life by one comment and they truly love to imagine you're the worst version of you they can imagine. So yeah, strap in. I think overall, the communities here are worth it, but there are times that assholes make me doubt that. Block instances, communities, and users who make you feel that way. It's definitely a far superior experience to reddit even given the assholes, though.

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

I just don’t read 99% of people who respond to my comments, I don’t reply to basically anyone and I don’t really check messages. I’m not obligated to do that so I’m not going to, don’t feed the trolls.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 18 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Same thing happened to the home video market. No more dvd sales and resales. Everything gets funneled into subscriptions.

This killed a lot of Indy films and films that had weak releases can no longer recoup any money via dvd sales. So more of those films simply don’t get made anymore

[–] HairyTeeth@lemmy.zip 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Weirdly, things are kinda of reversed in this situation.

To address things in backwards, digital platforms have been a massive boon to smaller studios due to not having to front the cost for manufacturing. It allows them to take creative risks and reach broader audiences.

As for the comparison to the DVD and Blu-Ray market, things sort of happened slowly and more "naturally" in that case. The market died because streaming offered a significant value to customers so they moved away of their own accord. It was a slow process and it took years before the downsides became apparent.

With games, the platform holders and publishers haven't bothered to offer any additional value for going digital, quite the opposite really. So the physical market has endured, and the resale market with it. Instead of learning any lessons or competing on value, they've decided to force the issue and just kill off the format itself.

One was a death, the other is an execution.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

Rent Extraction is the objective, and I partly disagree that killing the secondary market is the blanket objective. Look at ticketmaster. They sell the tickets, then they also take fees on the resale of those same tickets purchased by customers/scalpers. They profit twice thanks to the secondary market. Doesn’t work (yet) for something like books, but give it time.

The general objective is to force everything to subscription and also force upgrades thanks to them controlling EOL for everything. They never want to give users the ability to run their own servers for sunsetted services.

[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 16 hours ago

Is everyone on this platform fucking mental?

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 87 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

This is so much bigger than the secondary resale market, which is a small added bonus for them

The move from physical media; the price of computer components rising beyond reasonable levels; the locking down of hardware; the locking down of software distribution methods; the inevitability of de-anonymizing all Internet users…

The capitalist class has had enough of your criticism. We discovered their little criminal playground that preyed on children, we discovered how they hide their wealth without contributing back to society, we even discovered how government programs meant to “keep us safe” are used to exploit everyone on earth.

You think Sony ending physical discs is about video games? Brother it’s about the mind prison they’re designing to keep you in line while they fuck preteens on yachts until this whole planet burns to the ground

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Alternativelly, multiple subgroups within the power elites can support some of the same things for different reasons.

It's perfectly logical that, for example, intrusive tracking under the excuse of Age Checks "to protect the children" is supported by the Pedophiles in the Elites because it helps them detected early and suppress attempts to change the very system which gives them immunity for their crimes, non-Pedophile people in positions of power support it for very similar reasons only they want the system protected so that they can stay in power, maybe because they like power or because of the money and priviledges they get from their position in that system, and big companies selling media to users support it because it lets them more strongly bind copies of that media to specific users hence people can't share it (for example, two sibblings in the same house using the same device can't share a single copy of a game) so those companies sell more copies hence make more money.

Reducing most people's choices can serve different stakeholders who have different desires and for whom that reduction of the choices of consumers serves different objectives and yields different returns.

Trying to come up with a Theory of Everything for it is excessivelly reductionist and even simplistic - just because it's easier to get one's mind around a "they're all the same" explanation than around something like what I'm putting forward, doesn't mean the former is the right explanation.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago

Extrapolating a consumer usability problem into grandiose, vague fearmongering of the ultra-rich Epstein class isn’t helping anyone. It’s more likely to make people defeatist.

If you actually care about things like tax havens, or believe they have a relation to this issue, show people what they can do to fight them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 10 points 16 hours ago

Supplemental Question: This is my first post on Lemmy, and the responses have me wanting to clarify something- Is everyone on this platform fucking mental?

No, but the fediverse has a good portion of the crazier parts of the left wing (and they are very vocal). If it bothers you, go heavy on blocking the worst offenders and you'll find that most lemmings are pretty chill. We're "just" nuts enough stray from the mainstream platforms where most normies hang out.

I for one look forward to the day when I can recommend the fediverse to at least my left-wing friends w/o them questioning my sanity.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Their greatest competition is games that already exist. They want to transition to experiences as the service, to ensure you can't provide yourself with an experience that doesn't get them paid. This is much wider than video games, it's all media, from books to movies to music to videos games to dating and relationships. Controlling everything we value is the goal.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I saw another comment on lemmy that was like "everything you like in life is a market inefficiency"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry but I must ban your PSN, XBox and Steam account because of this comment. It's not my fault. People told me to do it. All your digital purchases are gone Sir.

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Bold of you to say "people".

Your account has been banned by an algorithm.

The algorithm will now take every attempt to communicate why you were banned as "suspicious activity" and ban you again.

Your IP has been logged, and all future accounts will be banned.

Please have your agentic AI log your proof of citizenship with the authorities for review and social re-education.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry but I can't confirm that you're human. Place certified PlayStation controller in your mouth, grab your right ear with your left hand, wave into camera with your right hand. Press ready button when you're ready.

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Ready, player one.

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

There is such a huge library of games made over the previous 30ish years. We really need new console games? Fuck it. Bring back vintage games. They were fun then and they are fun now

[–] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 15 hours ago

Yes, I would like new games please. Not necessarily console related, just I don't want to be stuck in the past, I would like to have new good experiences in my favorite medium thank you very much.

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 2 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Lemmy is pretty much composed of people who were banned on reddit.

They could have been banned for disagreeing with dickish mod... or for being asshole themselves.

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Some of us quit when we couldn't use RiF. Literally dozens of us

[–] Marleyinoc@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

I think that big game publishers have found that there's a real ceiling for what people are willing to pay for games, and direct digital sales are the only way they can drive up their share of that amount.

Game prices have not kept up with inflation over the past 30 years. If you cut the production costs and you cut out the reseller's margin, that equals more revenue for first-party titles. And it further sweetens the pot for console companies because they can take a cut of third-party titles that go through their stores. (Third-party developers still save on physical production and distribution, so it's a win for them, too.)

Not to mention the overall move toward software-as-a-service subscriptions across the board. If they can take your one-time $70 purchase and convert it into a monthly $5 subscription fee, now you're paying $130 for the first year and $60 per year afterward for that game.

I have games from 25 years ago that I still play. I feel really sorry for young gamers because they probably won't even have the option to revisit some of their old faves 25 years from now.

(I'm working my way through Castlevania: Circle of the Moon right now. It's not the best entry in the series, but it has its charms.)

[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Gamestop has become TOO POWERFUL!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›