this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
30 points (85.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

50348 readers
761 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The purpose could be testing what passes for human or warming up accounts for later propaganda use or who knows what else.

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago (1 children)

yes, what's the point of a forum if we are mostly talking to bots

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Which is why I left reddit. Even if they are real people behind some of those posts, it's still the same regurgitated garbage.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago
[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Honestly, with the state of many questions posted here, I'd be surprised if there wasn't a fair number of bots posting here.

One user in particular, has a posting history that is highly sus.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

I don't want to talk to a machine. I might as well be talking to a wall, or a cloud.

Also, all the resources the literally stupid things use to generate one idiotic response is just disgusting.

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As someone who takes the time to answer questions they know, yes. It takes time and effort for a human to formulate and write a response.

If im going to invest suitable effort into an answer, you better damn well be willing to put suitable effort into the question. Anything else is an attack on my time.

[–] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Isn’t there value in the discussion? If the question was worth responding to, I’d argue it’s a net benefit.

I’m playing devil’s advocate. I’m not sure what I think.

[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps there could be value in some kind of discussion, but I don't consider a human interacting with an LLM to be a "discussion" any more than a human interacting with a magic eight ball.

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

I think they meant that the question starts the conversation between humans, in the comments.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Yes. They provide no value and often times trained off if stolen data. Even the "good" bots that inline convert imperial to metric or fahrenheit to Celsius or similar, I think are annoying. I think all bots should be banned, zero tolerance.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 7 points 3 months ago

Yes because I'm not a guinea pig. But I'm sure it already happens and we're doomed anyway.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No. Because we have all seen Reddit.

[–] CallMeAl@piefed.zip 2 points 3 months ago

Wait. There are bots on reddit?

/s

[–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

Probably is already.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

It would explain a lot.

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 months ago

Yeah, if I'm replying to someone trying to help them with a question, I'd be upset if they weren't a real person.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 3 months ago

of course. I did not sign up for a human turing machine position.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 3 months ago

I wouldn't be too surprised for some of the instances.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I already think a good deal of questions everywhere these days were a person using AI to write the question and a ton of caveats for them. But they are still, technically, being posed by a human. That bothers me. Especially when they do it in NoStupidQuestions; this comm is specifically for questions you are embarassed about asking, such as when you can't articulate it like a college professor.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 months ago

On its face, no. Change venue to a writing forum, would a bot posting writing prompts be bad? Maybe, but I think it would be worse if it were bots answering.

For the long term, Lemmy karma doesn't work like Reddit karma. The up and down votes are tracked, but it's not like Reddit where you could farm karma and then sell it to a company that would use your karmic rating to boost past commoners to get their ads more prominently displayed. That system had its benefits, but it wasn't all good. Over here, all you can really hope for is a catchy username that people mentally associate with good posts going to an advertiser, who is then banking off the goodwill established by the original owner.

At the end of the day, bots should be declared as such. I have no problem interacting with a bot as long as I know it's a bot. But this begs the question — how do you know I'm not a bot? I use em dashes and I use the markdown formatting. I also use good grammar and the King's English for the most part (I'm with the yanks on "maneuver," fuck whoever made that word what it is) but I may or may not be one of the King's own subjects. Maybe I'm a bot and I don't know it. There are a few movies about that, maybe some games too. Then again, I accidentally cut myself shaving last week, so who knows. I've never heard of a bot doing that. Now if bots start acting like Millennials with their slang and their bad grammar and their wanton disregard of the English language, how fucked are we? Because right now a lot of people think I'm a bot because I have a high command of the language. I feel like in a few years, most of your bots will better integrate with how most people communicate online, not necessarily the best writers online.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not at all. Very little internet anything passes for human anymore.

[–] Steve@communick.news 1 points 3 months ago

Says the obvious bot

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My faith in humanity would be restored.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Batmancer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think they’re saying, the questions they’ve seen on here are so absurd or dumb that they couldn’t possibly be real people living in the world.

To be clear I don’t feel this way, just what I think they could be saying.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

Nice try, Claude.

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

Not really for as long as people engaging in the comments were real people. Though, then again, if they all were bots too but I didn't know and couldn't tell, then I'm not sure what the harm there even would be. If anything, I'd only expect the engagement to be more civil.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I don't really have a problem with a AI asking questions, if the goal is to generate "human" engagement.

Here me out:

I built a bot (back in Slack when we had slack communities) that asked "questions of the day". It was all copied/pasted questions from the internet like "What's the right way to hold a taco?" or "Do you wash behind your ears?" Just silly things.

And the discussions were AMAZING. I learned so many random stories and really bonded with people.

AI/bot/ whatever. The prompt is a prompt.