Not really for as long as people engaging in the comments were real people. Though, then again, if they all were bots too but I didn't know and couldn't tell, then I'm not sure what the harm there even would be. If anything, I'd only expect the engagement to be more civil.
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
25 points (85.7% liked)
No Stupid Questions
48776 readers
583 users here now
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
of course. I did not sign up for a human turing machine position.
I already think a good deal of questions everywhere these days were a person using AI to write the question and a ton of caveats for them. But they are still, technically, being posed by a human. That bothers me. Especially when they do it in NoStupidQuestions; this comm is specifically for questions you are embarassed about asking, such as when you can't articulate it like a college professor.
I wouldn't be too surprised for some of the instances.
yes, what's the point of a forum if we are mostly talking to bots
Which is why I left reddit. Even if they are real people behind some of those posts, it's still the same regurgitated garbage.
100%
Honestly, with the state of many questions posted here, I'd be surprised if there wasn't a fair number of bots posting here.
One user in particular, has a posting history that is highly sus.
This round of bot posters just woke up:
https://lemmy.world/post/48975557
https://lemmy.ml/post/49557938
those don't look like anything to me.
One user in particular, has a posting history that is highly sus.
When i see the sus posting history people i assume they're just trolls though, or engaging in a roleplaying fetish.
Is there a specific reason why someone would choose to target this site with fake engagement bots? The most obvious types of bots are the ones that come on here directly advertising something, e.g "this person writes great CVs / Code! Reach out to Botted Name at linkedin or BottedName@gmail.com to learn more! Buzzword Buzzword Buzzword." They get quickly removed and don't come often, so you might not have seen them.
But I just don't see what value is made from bots that pretend to be people. Is it because they're researching how to imitate human posters? Or do they just gather data based on how people respond? Sorry I'm kind of uncreative when it comes to this stuff.
I see basically two nefarious reasons for bots to pretend to be people on lemmy. I can't think of a good reason why you'd want them.
A company shilling it's product by appearing like a regular person. Bots have already ruined user reviews for products in basically every consumer industry. The best way to discover decent products now is word-of-mouth, so I could see a bot that pretends to be a user so it can show up in recommendation threads, like in Ask Lemmy or Buy It For Life.
The propaganda potential for bot users is tremendous. Kind of like the company shilling its product but on a grander scale. This could be orchestrated by those with economic interests, like promoting car-centric culture or climate change denialism which is of great interest to the oil industry. Or it could be as grand as foreign or domestic influence interfering with elections.
The fediverse isn't a huge place, but it's not nothing either. Operating costs are technically lower because you wouldn't need to use as many bots to infiltrate communities. You could even spin up your own instances so that your own bots don't get banned. I'm not really sure how you'd go about countering this sort of problem.
I don't want to talk to a machine. I might as well be talking to a wall, or a cloud.
Also, all the resources the literally stupid things use to generate one idiotic response is just disgusting.
Yes. They provide no value and often times trained off if stolen data. Even the "good" bots that inline convert imperial to metric or fahrenheit to Celsius or similar, I think are annoying. I think all bots should be banned, zero tolerance.
As someone who takes the time to answer questions they know, yes. It takes time and effort for a human to formulate and write a response.
If im going to invest suitable effort into an answer, you better damn well be willing to put suitable effort into the question. Anything else is an attack on my time.
Isn’t there value in the discussion? If the question was worth responding to, I’d argue it’s a net benefit.
I’m playing devil’s advocate. I’m not sure what I think.
Perhaps there could be value in some kind of discussion, but I don't consider a human interacting with an LLM to be a "discussion" any more than a human interacting with a magic eight ball.
I think they meant that the question starts the conversation between humans, in the comments.
Probably is already.
Yes because I'm not a guinea pig. But I'm sure it already happens and we're doomed anyway.
No. Because we have all seen Reddit.
Wait. There are bots on reddit?
/s
On its face, no. Change venue to a writing forum, would a bot posting writing prompts be bad? Maybe, but I think it would be worse if it were bots answering.
For the long term, Lemmy karma doesn't work like Reddit karma. The up and down votes are tracked, but it's not like Reddit where you could farm karma and then sell it to a company that would use your karmic rating to boost past commoners to get their ads more prominently displayed. That system had its benefits, but it wasn't all good. Over here, all you can really hope for is a catchy username that people mentally associate with good posts going to an advertiser, who is then banking off the goodwill established by the original owner.
At the end of the day, bots should be declared as such. I have no problem interacting with a bot as long as I know it's a bot. But this begs the question — how do you know I'm not a bot? I use em dashes and I use the markdown formatting. I also use good grammar and the King's English for the most part (I'm with the yanks on "maneuver," fuck whoever made that word what it is) but I may or may not be one of the King's own subjects. Maybe I'm a bot and I don't know it. There are a few movies about that, maybe some games too. Then again, I accidentally cut myself shaving last week, so who knows. I've never heard of a bot doing that. Now if bots start acting like Millennials with their slang and their bad grammar and their wanton disregard of the English language, how fucked are we? Because right now a lot of people think I'm a bot because I have a high command of the language. I feel like in a few years, most of your bots will better integrate with how most people communicate online, not necessarily the best writers online.
Yes but i don't think they are having seen them. A significant number of questions in this comm are me 😭
get em guys. hes not one of us!
Not at all. Very little internet anything passes for human anymore.
Says the obvious bot
Nice try, Claude.