this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
1037 points (99.7% liked)

Political Memes

12089 readers
1619 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago

I love how upset they get about Mandani. His crime, not been corrupt. Oh, the horror.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Other than the woman in Colorado and Mamdani, who else is there? I keep hearing about this wave of democratic socialists, but 2 people are not a trend.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

When has Republican fear mongering literally ever been based in truth or reality?

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Save the Republic from what, Mike?

Fulfilling our moral obligations to one another as Americans? Our duty to the sick, to the elderly, to the poor, as commanded by your God? Honoring the sacrifices of our soldiers by actually living up to the Constitution?

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Who or what is this Republic these clowns are always talking about?

[–] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 115 points 4 days ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 120 points 4 days ago

He's right, though. America does need to take this seriously. And elect all of them. To save the Republic.

[–] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don’t ever hear why the left leaning policies are bad, just that they are & should be hated. All I see is right leaning policies result in a reduction of liberties. What liberties would I be trading for left leaning policies? Which one isn’t a nanny state that tells me what I can and can’t do in situations that do not interfere with the liberty and health of another person? I’d prefer my tax dollars go to PSAs about good responsible parenting instead of having to prove my age to join a social media site. Parental control technology already exists. Tell people to use it.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This • 1000.

People gotta start getting Socratic about everything, but especially their news and politicians.

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We've lost many critical thinkers in our time, with clickbait titles (many don't really read the articles), "talking points" instead of substantive conversations, and lack of reading good literature (which I believe help to spur creative thought and can lead people to question things more often).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Pedophile protector says what?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 98 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Save the republic from… AFFORDABLE CHILDCARE!!!

[–] subverted_per@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 4 days ago

Please pray for the business models in this dire time.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Back in my day we licked insurance boot and sucked billionaire cock. Who wants to live in a world of affordable healthcare? THE DANGER IS RAEL!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It is indeed dangerous. For people like him, who see the writing on the wall that they will face consequences.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 49 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It's okay, MAGAs. When we get free health care for ALL Americans, you'll get it too.

When we have free day care, you'll get it, too.

When we have free college or trade school, you'll get it, too.

No thanks necessary, not that we were expecting any. Clearly you weren't raised properly.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

They don't care. They will starve their own children if they think even more colored children will starve.

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Didn’t they rally to get rid of Obama care, then cry foul when it turned out it was the same as the ACA?

Even if Americans achieve these things, the next Republican government would slogan them out of existence

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 60 points 4 days ago

I am a Mamdani!

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Do bear in mind that the root of the problem in the US is our oligarchs. We must deal with them FIRST, or it doesn't matter what else we do. That's why half (give or take) of the Democratic party is useless - because they have been corrupted by the oligarchs as well.

I don't care the terms people use - we're now calling it Democratic Socialism. Whatever we call it, we need to drive support for that until that part of the party can take over. But it will not happen if we don't remove the corrupting pressure from the oligarchs.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I would argue the root of the problem is the systems and institutions that enable these oligarchs to exist in the first place and give them the perceived social authority over this country.

The French Revolution didn't start after they removed the nobility, it started when the people began to unite and build alternatives to the systems they were living under which helped to establish mutual aid and other community networks of support that allowed them to eventually abandon their reliance on the systems of their oppressors.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

My only counter is that the tools were put in place by the people with the money. So I have no disagreement with you - I see that distinction as unimportant because I believe we must deal with the rich and their tools already, so… I agree with you :)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 42 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Will America finally get a proper left wing?

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Even if they get it, there's still the two party system. DSA would have to wipe the floor with the Dems nationwide, correct?

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Anytime soon? Probably not.

But as someone who is decently US-left, I think that's not so important. If we can get people to the point of fighting for equal rights, human rights, universal health care, wealth equality, and social safety nets, we can worry about what's next after that.

For fuck's sake, we're dealing with fascism. Just getting us back to merely right-wing-centric politics would be a magickal feat.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org 15 points 3 days ago (15 children)

545 people


Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does.

You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? They are the leader of the majority party. They and fellow House members, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million can not replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.

If the Marines are in IRAN , it's because they want them in IRAN .

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power. Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.

They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees.

We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 10 points 3 days ago

In June, Mamdani said:

"For far too long our party has seen its job as managing decline instead of delivering material change for working people. It has seen its job as explaining why we cannot instead of showing how we can."

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

I think the problem is systemic. These representatives are vulnerable not just to bribery, but to threats as well. The core concept of giving your political power to another person introduces a principal-agent problem.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago

🔥💥Zohran the Destroyer💥🔥 and his horde army!

[–] bubabeanbryant@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Lord Commander Johnson is a teensy tiny bit insecure methinks

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is one of the only benefits of Trump winning in 2024

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

And unintentional incentives to get off oil

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Speaker Johnson has lost the plot entirely. His comments are showing consistently he has neither empathy nor perspective regarding the working class experience, and working class concerns.

Johnson has become a running trend of let them eat cake.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I just call him a traitor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They've always been there, only now can they be seen.

One of the good side effects of the internet; the government has a much harder time controlling the narrative. Those socialists have always been there and fighting for higher minimum wage and unions since 1910 or so. Prior to internet, they were simply ignored for the most part. I'm not even a socialist, and would have never known about them if I wasn't involved in local politics. I do agree with some of their platform, though (pro-union, etc.)

Registered Independents are now the majority of voters for a reason (40%), the majority of voters no longer support the major parties.

Government control of media remains a huge problem... don't trust any one source, verify everything as much as possible.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SebasFC@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

So happy mini moral people are flourishing

load more comments
view more: next ›