this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
1010 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

12075 readers
2374 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Step 1 - make housing unaffordable

Step 2 - start crying about declining fertility rates

Step 3 - just keep whining and applying bandaid solutions that don't do anything to address the underlying cause of unaffordable housing

[–] weeeeum@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Step 4 - scapegoat minorities for all of the country's issues

[–] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Step 5 - believe it or not, somehow, profit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemonbun@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

hope the boomers die because no one wants to pick up their shit in nursing homes

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is something I keep thinking about.

My wife and I have been together for 20 years. For the majority of that time, we have been taking care of various silent-generation and boomer members of her family who decided that they will just dump themselves on the most compassionate and competent member of the family (my wife) and thats their retirement plan. Right now we are dealing with her mother, and we have made it clear to the rest of her family and my family that after her, we're done, and anyone else can live under a fucking overpass because we would like to be husband and wife, not caretakers.

My wife has become adept at finding care facilities that take medicare and placing people in them. But not everyone has the time/ability to make that happen.

Of course we are not unique in having this issue. What happens when two people are staying in a 1 bedroom apartment that they both must work to afford? They might really want to care for mom and dad but...

And we end up with considerably more homeless boomers.

[–] lemonbun@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yeah this is on them to figure out. Hoping their end of days is no one else's problem but their own

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah my sympathy ran out around 2016. For some reason.

The eldery and truck drivers: two groups of people I used to respect, until I met too many of them.

[–] lemonbun@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

same here buddy, used to have alot of respect, just their actions don't deserve sympathy. got tired of the get mine attitude. our generation and newer generations just get the shit end of things and we don't get a chance to play by the same rules.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

Boomers (b. 1946-1966) bought houses long before they were $70k. Assuming a great job straight out of high school, the first ones would have been buying homes as early as 1964, the last boomers by 1984.

Taking the middle - 1974 - and in my neck of the woods the median 1974 starter home was about $16k CAD, and the minimum wage was $4k/yr. This put even minimum wage workers within spitting distance of the flip side of the one-third rule, which states the price of a new home should not exceed three years of income. Workers in good industries - such as framers, plumbers, and electricians - easily met this 3× rule even within a year or three of starting work.

So the better phrase would be:

boomers bought houses at $16k when they were making $6k/yr

[–] LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works 122 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Boomers selling their homes at 10x cost and preaching about savvy investing

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The problem is the house is so overvalued, they never modernized it, and is far beyond what most people can afford for it. They're just born at the right time to be able to retire and have a house.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

nah it’s deregulation on corps buying homes as investments

like usual thank republicans and neolibs

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also, AirBnB creating a system that incentivized the purchase of homes as rentals.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Not even an exaggeration. My parents bought their house in the 1960s for $14K. Their 30-year mortgage went almost to the year 2000 and their monthly payment was fucking $85 the entire time. They sold it fifteen years ago for $190K.

[–] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Damn never realized this but every boomer homeowner is actually an investment savant. Why are we all so stupid? Why can't we just do this? ^/s

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The dumbest financial mistake you've ever made was not going into debt immediately to buy a home the day you were born. Should have planned ahead.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 98 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (26 children)

I do not like calling people trying to afford to buy a pile of lumber and tape on a small parcel a "market".

It removes the fact that homes used to stay flat value or go down in value before houses became a "market".

Fuck markets. The markets should be crushed. And American home builders should be ashamed of the quality of American homes.

A pile of lumber and tape.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Of course, a "market" doesn't have to mean the thing is a financial instrument. I go to the market to buy grocereries. I am not intending to resell the carrots that I bought from "market".

[–] zaph@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 days ago

And yet grocery stores are in a similar situation with prices going up while quality and quantity go down. Maybe it doesn't have to mean the thing is a financial instrument but if it can be it will be.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is how the billionaires are winning, they manipulate folks into being angry at everyone but THEM. "Boomers" didn't buy $70k houses, your grandparents did.

Meamwhile, Zuckerberg is laughing his ass off while fortifying his Kauai ranch estate.

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"Boomers" are the grandparents to most of social media posters these days. Statistically the internet stays centered at about teenager to 20 year old being the peak of the normal distribution of users. That's the Baby Boomers' grandchildren. Great grandchildren even.

Just pointing that out, but otherwise I agree. They're all angry at a strawman "Boomer". That strawman in reality is demographically a small portion of the world population who are very rich. The majority of baby boomers got fucked in their own way by the rich.

You guys are all distracted into fighting each other.

Furthermore, I'm continuously baffled at how or why people fawn over the anecdotes about those who talk about their parents having a good life straight out of college and now owning multi-million dollar homes. How can you not realize these anecdotes are from rich kids of rich boomers. You guys are so hungry to eat the rich??? That's them right there. What are you praising and fawning over them for. Start eating.

All part of the distraction. The lesser than billionaire rich hiding in plain sight, running distraction for the richest of the rich.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 7 points 2 days ago

You can still buy homes in US cities for under $150k. I just looked up my first home. I paid $37k in 1996, sold it for $74k in 2007, it's worth about $125k now. It's not a great location, but there are good jobs around St. Louis. If you want to live in an Instagram home in a big coastal city, I have no sympathy.

The sad part is that I make less money today than I did in 1996, not even factoring inflation. Inflation isn't so terrible if wages move with it, but wages are completely stagnant even as prices double. I can't afford to move. I've been stuck in my current home since I bought it. I just hope I'm able to pay it off before I'm no longer able to work.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 67 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, but now you and your significant other work so thats like 120k a year. /s

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 25 points 3 days ago

And the fact that you're each working multiple part time jobs and gigs, well that's the extra freedom we had lying around.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 37 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Not just the US, we can't buy a house anywhere, boomer cunts stole everything from future generations and will claim to their dying breath that THEY had it rough.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Dont fall for the intergenerational war. The rich are sitting on all the assets and stealing from future generations

[–] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Ya but they rich are mostly boomers and boomers are actively voting and supporting policies that make this worse. It's not universal but does hold some weight.

[–] majster@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Correct. What all these places have in common is housing expansion after WW2 when personal automobile became a thing for majority. There is no more cheap land. We are back to 19th century and it sucks.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wages really need to go up if prices won't come down. Even food is unaffordable.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

LOL 😂 in Canada, if minimum wage - currently $18.25/hr - was indexed to home prices starting from 1972, when median homes in my city were $16k and minimum wage was $4k/yr, said minimum wage would currently be $150/hr, or $300k/yr.

That’s an 8.22× jump in minimum wage.

I would love to see most people being faced with this fact.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 7 points 2 days ago

I realize the Canadian dollar is weaker than the US dollar but $18.25 is a pipe dream for tens of millions of Americans. Our minimum wage is $7.25. As of today that is $10. 29 CAD. Wages in my area are a little higher, places generally pay $13-15 and maybe $20 for skilled jobs. But I know a ton of people making around $13. Even that is basically right at Canadian minimum wage after converting. Our housing isn't cheap either.

[–] Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Meaningful change will only happen when fewer than half of all people own houses. Now, more than half owns a property, and, if the system was to change, they'd lose money. More than half the people will uphold this status quo.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (5 children)

It hurts homeowners who aren't interested in ever moving as well. Property taxes are based on home value.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] _chris@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (4 children)

..kalshi is a news source?

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago

Yo, who be making 60k? That sounds like Gucci shit.

load more comments
view more: next ›