this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
330 points (99.7% liked)

News

39192 readers
2894 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Postmaster General David Steiner told a Senate committee Wednesday that, if a proposed rule is adopted, the U.S. Postal Service would withhold mail ballots from states that do not hand over to the federal government lists of people who have requested absentee or mail ballots.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 109 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Personally, I'm curious how they intend to apply this to states like mine, where all ballots are mailed.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My state is similar. The USPS were supposed to meet with state lawmakers this week, but cancelled last minute.

Hmmmmm.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago

Make sure the ACLU is there, just for expertise.

[–] dreksob@feddit.online 14 points 2 months ago

They will just declare that Republicans won all the elections

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My prediction is that a lawsuit will go to a federal court, where they will strike this rule down based on Article I Section 4 of the Constitution.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They maybe fucked up by not waiting until closer to the election

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

No votes for you.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Damn, your state doesn't even have drop boxes?

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Oh, we do. I meant that all of the ballots get mailed to voters before the election. We can either mail them back (postage paid) or drop them off at drop boxes in every district. It's a pretty awesome system, but if the USPS refuses to deliver the ballots it could be a problem. The state would have to figure out some other way to distribute them. It would be a huge PITA (not to mention expense) and probably reduce voter turnout significantly.

[–] lechatron@lemmy.today 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In Oregon where we've been vote by mail since like the 90s you can still vote in person. But we don't really have the infrastructure to allow every voter to vote in person. If those ballots don't get mailed out I imagine most Oregonians just won't vote, and those that do are going to be stuck in never ending lines.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago

Does Oregon not allow you to print your ballot if it doesn't get delivered in time like WA?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Personally, I’m curious how they intend to apply this to states like mine, where all ballots are mailed.

...probably reduce voter turnout significantly.

Asked and answered.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Oh yeah, that makes sense.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Anyone supporting this should be hanged. Or guillotined. I'm ok with either.

[–] plz1@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, it wouldn't really work in the other order...

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 months ago

There’s that good ol’ fashioned American ingenuity!

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago

So...extortion? Got it.

[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago (5 children)

How in the fuck is this okay or legal?

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There's no difference between a law not existing and a law not enforced

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

It's even worse actually, because the laws are selectively enforced. They become a cudgel

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago

My grandfather was a state trooper. His motto was "It's only a crime if you get convicted."

ACAB, BTW.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You need to move past your legacy definition of 'okay' and 'legal'. Those have shifted. We are not going back, unfortunately.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Fascists with higher powers don't care about rules for themselves, the rules are only to keep people in check and to give something to the footsoldiers to believe in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Video of Postmaster General saying USPS won't send mail ballots to states that don't provide voter lists

https://lemmy.world/post/48632196

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if they realize that blatantly breaking the law to serve the Cheeto-in-Chief will leave them all hanging out to dry.

Trump got rules in place to protect him from prosecution, all his idiots are still on the hook, and statue of limitations is longer than a presidential term ;)

[–] NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pardon pardon pardon pardon

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

didnt trump already normalize the revocation of pardons

[–] YabbaDabbaDipshit@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And overusing exective orders.

It would be funny if the next guy signed one saying all of trumps executive orders are null. It won't happen because dems love this shit as much as republicans they just won't say it out loud.

[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Afaik pardons can't be revoked?

[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 19 points 2 months ago

Are there realy still people who thinks the USA is still a democracy?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would imagine that, in vote by mail states like mine, we would instantly have tens of thousands of volunteers going "Cool, cool... we'll hand deliver them. Fuck you USPS."

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

you can bring them to your voting place directly. thats what I did in the primary because he was already talking this trump.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The problem is people getting them in the first place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Enemy Domestic

[–] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

The game is "do illigal action, ask for forgiveness/ make it legal later." Ok, we'll start killing the ultra rich and thier loyalist boot lickers, guards and pawns, and make it legal later then. :D

[–] BlindPenguin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago
[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago
[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago

I'm not american. Is there some other way they could be delivered without USPS? Do any states have their own postage system that could handle this?

load more comments
view more: next ›