this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
751 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

85670 readers
3411 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FeloniousPunk@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago

Meta about to get fucked like never before.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 237 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Never thought we'd be rooting on Big Porn to help save integrity of the internet, but I'm all for it. They brought us HD, 4K, VR, now let's go save the rest.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 132 points 1 week ago

And VCRs and modern streaming video players. Pornhub had better seeking, thumbnails, and the "people watched this part" graph before YouTube.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The internet arguably exists as a mass phenomenon because of porn. They have their shit and unethical parts. But, on the internet tech side, almost all the good (and some of the bad) trends appeared on porn first.

[–] Cavemanfreak@programming.dev 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Unfortunately, we might see the end of that soon...

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've always rooted for big porn

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And small porn. It's not about the size, it's about what you do with it.

[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

And the water was cold

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They brought us HD, 4K, VR

They also brought us video streaming and online payment systems. Both were technologies pioneered by porn sites.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

They also motivated endless generations to work as pizza delivery guys, plumbers or TV technicians

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I always feel bad for just a moment when I order a pizza because you know on some level the delivery guy is hoping this delivery will be the one. Sexy lady in a corset or maybe naked, maybe more than one lady! Sigh, just a big straight guy- at least he was polite and tipped well.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 2 points 6 days ago

The rise of POS terminals destroyed one of the major plot twists in the pizza delivery sub-genre

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Naw it doesnt work like that. As someone who use to do insurance claims twice have people made a move on me and its fucking awkward not sexy. Both were clearly druggies. No shame on that, but god imagine in the middle of your work day you walk into your customer getting fucked while she's barely conscious. And this is after she handed you a piece of paper 2 days prior with i want to fuck you scribbled all on the page. Like a crazy amount. This is not a comfortable situation in the slightest, and if anyone ever wishes for some random sex event like this to happen to them, and if it starts..... fucking run away.

[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 125 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I bet the jury had to thoroughly inspect the video evidence.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

Never been more jealous of a jury until now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 83 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the best part of the article (besides the decision of course) is the following:

“A Strike 3 Holding investigation found that 47 IP addresses belonging to Meta were used to torrent 2,396 of its videos a total of 6,008 times between 2018 and 2025.”

If videos are being downloaded more than once, it’s hard to argue it’s just for model training. lol.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago (3 children)

$150,000 fine per civil infringement X 6,008 instances... $901,200,000.

Now assume a settlement for half the value and it's still $450M

Do it porn industry! On principle.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Honestly:

“A Strike 3 Holding investigation found that 47 IP addresses belonging to Meta were used to torrent 2,396 of its videos a total of 6,008 times between 2018 and 2025.”

That's 2396 x 6008 x $150,000=$2.159 Billion

And honestly, that's what they need to do. $450M is a cost of business expense.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't understand your math.

[–] immutable@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago

I think it’s due to an incorrect reading of this sentence

“A Strike 3 Holding investigation found that 47 IP addresses belonging to Meta were used to torrent 2,396 of its videos a total of 6,008 times between 2018 and 2025.”

There’s two interpretations of this sentence, that they was a total of 6008 downloads of 2396 videos, so some videos were downloaded multiple times.

The math in that comment is reading it to mean the 2396 items were downloaded 6008 each.

Since the original uses the clarifier “a total of 6,008” the first interpretation is the likely correct one and the commenter accidentally interpreted it the second, incorrect, way.

Easy enough mistake to make if you skip over the phrase “a total of”

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 76 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Their LLMs might get a little confused now when people ask about British shows on BBC.

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Poison all the LLMs where they scrape.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Image generation has issues with JPEG artifacts, "music" generation has issues with MP3 artifacts, let's make their generators even more broken!

[–] LetThereBeNick@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

Why did grandma say she never answered the door after the first time the BBC man came to collect?

[–] SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev 66 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They are mostly getting hit because they seeded, which is hilarious that even Meta couldn't risk get banned for hit and run on a tracker.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do they mention if the trackers were private? It'll be interesting to see in discovery the details of the trackers and which ones are being monitored by the industry.

[–] lemongarlic@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pretty much every public tracker is monitored

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Private ones too. Privacy in private trackers is largely a myth, and you should be using a VPN regardless of public or private.

If you (a relative Joe Schmo Nobody in the torrenting scene) can get an invite to the private tracker, you really think a billion dollar media industry couldn’t arrange to get one too? Of course they have straw-man accounts on the big private trackers, and of course they’re quietly seeding media to be able to log IP addresses that connect to the swarm.

The only real benefit private trackers have is better seeding requirements (meaning stuff typically downloads faster, and is less likely to stall indefinitely) and better request systems (meaning obscure media is usually easier to find, and you can request media that is missing).

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope Meta gets the shaft

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

alone_in_the_dark.jpeg

[–] BallShapedMan@lemmy.world 64 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hopefully this is just the beginning. Go after all of the AIs!

[–] ceiphas@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

Not Weird Al

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago

Everyone needs to sue Meta

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Cue settlement because Meta cannot stomach discovery on this one. As the article shows, this lawsuit comes from discovery in a different lawsuit. These are the sorts of dominos that trigger settlements.

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The settlement should include the removal of anything that was gained by training on the data. Meta will complain that the data is too ingrained in the model and can't be removed. They likely aren't wrong but that does not seem like Blacked's problem. Maybe sell them a license to continue to use the data at $200k per year per video until they can definitively prove that none of the data is still in the model?

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Now that would be interesting, because you can't prove a negative. The only way for Meta to prove that none of the videos is making their way intot he model is to provide clear evidence of all the other videos and stuff that are making their way into the model.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Wa-howww! That is not a headline I had on my bingo card for today.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ok, so this is happening in the northern California district, so once it gets before an appellate don't hold y'all's breathe. And you can better make damn sure you don't bet against meta bribing someone to make sure it happens in Texas, on polymarket!

But also 47 addresses streamed 2,800 some odd videos 6,000 times! Of which it seems there was a mention of ‘Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1987-1996),’, so does that mean they watched all the cartoons and movies back to back?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Meta needs to get fucked with one of those BBDs.

This is the weirdest fucking timeline I swear to Cthulhu

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I hope Meta get it like one of those tiny blonde girls I've heard feature in Blached videos tehehehehe

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

To explain how solid this pun is: The actress in the “white girl surrounded by five black dudes” meme is named Piper Perri.

To explain how solid this pun is: The actress in the “white girl surrounded by five black dudes” meme is named Piper Perri.

[–] ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Well, no, the tiny blonde generally seems to enjoy it, though...

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Discovery is going to be wlid

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›