Remember the countries that voted in the UN against food being a human right ? The USA and Israel.
Flippanarchy
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
Yeah these two would vote against air being a human right.
No we obviously built agriculture so we could have futures trading
Kill the rich, save the poor. Taxation, is not enough for the current era. There must be justice for the crimes committed. Once they are dead, then we can figure out how to run the world without capitalism. Untill then, the elimination of the ultra-rich by any means should be the goal. Everything else is noise.
We've done this. The people in charge of the killing are the new kings.
Not saying it'll yield a worse situation, tho.
"I'll do it again. Gif"
And if you go back to the original community structure it was the family or tribe - where the whole point was group survival, not luxury for a few while the majority scraped by.
Food should not be a commodity
Would you prefer it was a luxury?

For profit. Who cares about people?
It already is, dumbass.
Note: It's a right in the sense of "it should be available to buy", but not "you can get it for free"-kind-of-right.
Uhh it starts with I can't believe anyone would think implying there are a lot of people who don't think it is a right. Your or the UN's declaration that it is right means nothing if people don't agree to it. Besides, the devil is always in the details.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/nov/09/united-nations-right-to-food-us-hunger
A right can be positive or negative. Saying you have the right to buy food without money is pointless. A positive right would mean someone would need to provide you that food if you can't afford it. What type of right and is it provided if needed is the crux of the issue.
The shareholders disagree. And their opinion is the only one that matters
Food, shelter and warmth are the only things we need. And we have more than enough for every single person on earth. Boy oh boy did we ever reveal our shortcomings as a race. Even barn rats look out for each other.
Water.
Yeah and water might soon become the one thing we don't have enough of
It was implied with food but you are correct.
Who is "we"? What "race"?
No thanks on this vague distraction from the actual blame.
We? Fucking humans. Earthlings. God the divisiveness has eaten deep into your brain.
The human race, I presume. Even though humanity isn't a race. English is so fucked up.
You are correct. I want everyone to have everything (or at least the opportunity).
Capitalism can not exist without the violent deprivation of basic human needs.
Fr, where do people think their clothes come from?
Because dragon gold