this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
85 points (89.7% liked)

Games

49588 readers
1345 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A legend, reborn.The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time is coming to Nintendo Switch 2 later this year.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

props to them for just calling it its name instead of The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time Reocarinated or whatever like all other remakes these days

[–] isyasad@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I like it when they at least differentiate the title a little bit. Makes it a little bit easier to distinguish between the two games.

Remakes often have different staff, art direction, design philosophy, gameplay, etc. so personally I kinda prefer that they give it a new title instead. Using the exact same title makes me feel like they're trying to replace the original.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Everyone will just say "remake" after the title, like with the Resident Evil games.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Switch 2 Remake" to clarify from the "3DS Remake".

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've always heard it called by its official name Ocarina of Time 3D. Nobody calls Super Mario 64 DS "Super Mario 64 Remake".

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Super Mario 64 DS has new levels & you start the game as Yoshi. It's a reimagining.

Ocarina of Time 3D just has some QoL changes like making the iron boots an item (and different graphics).

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

no, now they’ve moved on to "re-[word that’s kinda linked]ed" lol

pvz replanted, epic mickey rebrushed, patapon 1+2 replay, more recently rayman legends retold…

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time ReReDead

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

It’s just gonna be like Doom and Doom 2016.

[–] emmanuel_car@k.fe.derate.me 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Sigh I feel like this has been done to death. When are we getting a TP remake? I would actually consider buying a switch 2 for that.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The TP recompile on PC, Dusklight, has been a blast. 120fps and 4k textures. Also runs really well on steamdeck.

I acknowledge that's nowhere near the same thing as a proper remake, but thought I'd mention it in case you hadn't heard of it.

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, it's awesome, honestly. I agree people should check it out.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Original in 1998, 3DS reskin in 2011. I don't think that qualifies as "done to death".

[–] grinning_serpent@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

OoT3D isn't a reskin, it's a remake. A lot of stuff changed under the hood, which is one reason most OoT speedruns stick to N64.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, you're right. The Switch 2 one is just much MORE of a remake, a re-imagining (or so it's rumored).

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't forget the GameCube "Master Quest" version.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That was just emulation of (an official hack of) the N64 one. I don't count that any more than the Wii, Wii U, or Switch emulations of it. The 3DS one had actual new graphics.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It was a version made for the N64DD that got released for the GameCube instead. It's definitely more like DLC, given it had improved graphics and alternate dungeons, so it's more than just a re-release.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah, but it wasn't even sold in stores - it was a bonus disk with Wind Waker pre-orders.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually this remake would be the perfect time to bundle that in

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

They never would, because N64 NSO exists. Kinda surprised they haven't tossed it on there, though.

[–] _ed@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting - did not know that

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I was surprised too. It's a weird concept from the get-go, but I guess the idea was to release an "extended" edition to promote new hardware.

I guess it's most similar to what they did with pokemon games. Blue/Red leading to Yellow or Gold/Silver leading to Crystal.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Releasing the same game for the third time isn't done to death?

We all clowned on Bethesda about it for Skyrim, Nintendo doesn't deserve any different. Besides which this is an obvious ploy to try and regain control over their game after the decompilation projects.

I'll pass. I can continue to play the game just fine, upscaled in 1080p 60FPS like we've been doing.

[–] shinratdr@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

Bethesda ported Skyrim to 4 successive console generations across 15 years and made a VR version, all of which had very minor enhancements. In that time they made zero other Elder Scrolls games.

Nintendo made one enhanced port across 28 years, and is now making a remake. In that time they have made countless Zelda games.

This is not even remotely the same situation.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The third time in 28 years? Yeah, I don't think that's done to death. And Skyrim has never been REMADE, just ported. This isn't just another reskin, it's a ground-up remake. The original is a different experience.

[–] grinning_serpent@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Don't need TP remake. Dusk is already out and Courage Reborn is supposed to be arriving soonish.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just play TP decompiled. It probably beats the HD remaster and is the closest thing to a remake we will get.

[–] emmanuel_car@k.fe.derate.me 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah if I had the right hardware I would, but I don’t have a gaming PC and not looking to buy one any time soon with the state of component pricing.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or just like…not pour dev resources into more remakes?

[–] grinning_serpent@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Nintendo has fuck you money and lots of teams. I doubt this was any kind of mutually exclusive thing.

[–] silver@das-eck.haus 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I will be interested to see if they actually make any changes or improvements, or if this is yet another round of a the exact same game with new graphics. Ever since the decompilation, the modding scene for OoT and MM has been booming, I can't imagine the switch 2 version will be worth it unless it brings something really interesting to the table

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure this is a ground-up remake rather than another reskin.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Was really hoping for more than what was shown, but at least it's confirmed, I guess. This will be my second Switch 2 game purchase.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Was your first also a full-price version of a game they made 20 years ago?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, it was Bananza, and OoT was actually made 28 years ago! This looks like a full-on remake, not just a reskin like the 3DS version. I'm willing to pay full price for that.

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

If you're talking about Star Fox, it's 30 years

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Hell yeah brother, cheers from Hyrule.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 5 points 1 month ago

It's coming out this year and that's all they had to show? Disappointing. I'd love to see more to decide if I'm buying a switch 2 for this.

[–] Cellari@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

As with everything, I'll consider it after launch. I know it should be good, but I've been burned too many times already.

[–] grinning_serpent@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Pass. Ship of Harkinian already exists and other than some of the QoL features like assigning d-pad to item shortcuts like ocarina, boots, etc (which Ship and the randomizer both offer), OoT is one of those retro games that really doesn't need changes or, IMO, even significantly benefit from them. You can't improve on perfection.

But if people want to spend $80 for a 30 year old game to justify buying the $650 console, more power to em.

I'd rather Nintendo just pull a Konami and bundle related old games in a prepackaged emulator and sell that instead.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Better not be an open world game.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Ocarina of Time was already very open world. Once you beat the Deku Tree almost the entire map opens up. You can go anywhere anytime except for west of the bridge the Gerudo Valley and a couple of small areas that house the entrances to temples.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

No, Ocarina of Time was not an open world Zelda game. It was "open zone," if that, and was only non-linear in like, two places. Only some of the temples as Adult Link could be completed in a different order than intended. Ocarina of Time is a linear game, with a curated experience. You more or less accomplish a task that unlocks the next place you need to go. Sure, you could technically go to the front door of some areas despite you never needing to, but doing so was pointless because it was just a barrier until you completed the necessary task to unlock it. The order of those places getting unlocked is more or less the same for every playthrough.

This is different from the open world Zelda games, where going somewhere is technically never pointless, because you can always access everything from any point in the game (making Quest Items meaningless, which is likely why they were removed from those games).

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I think you're splitting hairs a little bit but I think OoT is much more open world than open zone. Open zone is Sonic or Mario Odyssey. Oot is open world because, like Link to the Past and OG Zelda before it, it's one big explorable map full of secrets to find at side quests to do at will.

The story progression is structured but that's not at odds with being open world.

My prediction is that the map probably becomes one large and more cohesive map while the story remains structured.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

The OG was a fucking open world game. The whole series has been pretty much open world, give or take a couple games, since the first entry.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›