this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
646 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

85837 readers
3424 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OberonSwanson@sh.itjust.works 154 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

Of course it is, it’s essentially a scam. They just need enough humans to keep investing until they check out and run with a bailout.

[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 56 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Funny thing is, the US government doesn't even have nearly enough money to bail all these mfa out. So we are heading into uncharted territory here

[–] OberonSwanson@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Of course they don’t, that’s why they’re building bunkers. Thinking it’ll slow us down, as we’ll open their bunkers like cans of tuna. A bunker only works for so long, then the survivors start hunting for them like delicious shipwrecks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 weeks ago

And that's why they're trying underhanded tactics to inflate earnings and IPO directly into the index funds, so every American's 401K will legally have to rebalance and invest in them. They're racing to fleece retirement funds before the bubble bursts.

Not financial advice, of course :p but people should really consider getting their stuff out and into self-directed funds or whatever it is US people do to not depend on auto-allocated funds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Yliaster@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't get why companies get to legally bailout like this. Why do people have to suffer for their bullshit? Enslave the CEOs if you have to make things right, leave the people out of it.

[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's simple, because the people making laws and overseeing the adherence to those laws are great buddies with those same CEOs.

So, corruption.

Though i do agree with you, there is no such thing as too big to fail. Government shouldn't have any handouts to corporations.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 89 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

reminder than during 2019 there were streaming services popping left and right, all showing tremendous growth because they started from zero, and articles were about how bad Netflix was doing due to having practically no growth compared with the competition (they already had a massive subscriber base). Twist? Netflix was the only streaming service that was actually making a profit, the rest were a massive loss but big growth.

Needless to say most of those streaming services died; who remembers DC streaming service, or Yahoo's? While Netflix is basically as stong as ever, despite the prevalent enshitification happening through the whole industry.

Point of the story? shareholders don't care about stable profitable business, only cancerous growth. AI is like that, zero profits, ton of cost, but as long as they show growth the shareholders are happy, regardless of how cooked the books are.

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

2019 Yahoo

My immediate thought, there is no way Yahoo! Screen survived into 2019.

I looked it up and Yahoo! Screen (which featured Community season 6) was shutdown in January 2016. But Yahoo! View launched in late 2016 (as a Hulu-like replacement), and that did shutter in mid 2019.

So Yahoo! was already dead, but it also died for real in 2019.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Imagine having a streaming service so bad it fails twice

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Isn't that kind of Yahoo!'s business model?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 50 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

they are spending infinite money for every $1 i pay them

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 36 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

I'm quite happy to use their compute power for frivolous bullshit if it hastens their enshittification and demise.

"Hey Claude, can you begin work on an e-commerce site written in visual basic?"

*Two microseconds later... *

"Your free usage limit has been reached"

"Ok Claude see you tomorrow, maybe we'll think about a rewrite in Turbo Pascal"

[–] Thassodar@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"I need a triple A cooking game with blackjack and hookers, all written in SQL."

"But that's a database langu-"

"Did I stutter?"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 47 points 3 weeks ago
[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 39 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

Honestly Google is likely to beat openAI and Anthropic as things are.

OpenAI and Anthropic have to buy/rent their hardware from Nvidia, while Google is making their own TPU hardware. Google's hardware costs on AI is way lower, every dollar they spend on it goes a lot farther.

And unlike the other two, they're already a profitable company. They're making record profits right now. They don't have a desperate need to figure out how to make back billions on their AI models, they can just keep offering Gemini at a comparatively cheap price and wait for anthropic and open AI to bankrupt themselves.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 34 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

It's gonna come crashing down pretty soon. It's gonna hurt all of us. It won't hurt the people responsible nearly enough.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] adarza@piefed.ca 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

so these crazy prices i hear about being implemented (like at github) should actually be at least 10x higher?

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

10x higher to break even :)

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

To break even on operating expenses, not even counting debt payments, depreciated capital value, or future recapitalization costs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Nice try, I ain't gonna pay anyway

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, this is no different than Walmart making prices low until other businesses die out and then raising them.

It is no different than police shoving all the homeless people and drug addicts into one area of town to crash the property prices, and then evicting them once developers buy everything for cheap.

They're purposely operating at a loss in the expectation that they can get ingrained into a ton of workflows, and then gouge everyone absolutely to death while also worsening the quality of the service to make it cheaper for them to run.

If it weren't so horrible for the environment, I'd kind of like it, because all the dumbass executives that are signing up for this are going to get exactly what they deserve. You'd think they'd recognize a scheme when they see one.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 18 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

My CEO (whom I don't consider a particularly good or bad CEO) spent a day playing with AI then when asked if he'd sign the company up with the service he literally laughed in their faces and said it's useless. I was honestly shocked because he's totally into buzzword and popular crap. Gained a lot of respect for him that day.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Good thing I don't personally pay them anything

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Oh, you are going to pay. The bubble is going to fuck us all quite thoroughly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] usernametbd@lemmy.zip 19 points 3 weeks ago

Definition of a Bubble. These AI huckster keep stringing investors on though. Sadly, I think these public IPOs coming up for Space X, OpenAI, and Anthropic will fall short of expectation and trigger the bubble popping.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

Trust me bro we're so close to profitability bro, just need this IPO to secure funding one last time bro then we'll be profitable bro I swear.

[–] Cornpop@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

What is the actual “cost” after they buy the hardware, is that $1000 really pure power usage cost?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem is that the hardware has a 5 or 6 year depreciation schedule on paper, but NVIDIA keeps saying that their next generation chip will be twice as good as their last chip so there is a FOMO schedule of like every two years.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Now, I'm no MBA, but that seems like a bad business plan...

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder how much they spend for every $0 I pay them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago

Good thing all the companies leaning hard on AI 10 X'd their profits... Wait...

[–] Steve@startrek.website 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

How much do they spend when I pay nothing?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 12 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

My first use of Claude this week, for code reviews only(since no LLM can be trusted to write a user story or test suite), had it gaslight me.

It marked down my code for using a specific practice to make some xml safer and easier to read.

When I tried things its way, it wanted me to change it back.

[–] WYLD_STALLYNS@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly, never trust an LLM to code. And if it argues back, explain why it’s wrong and that you have nothing but time and experience. Most tend to fold when you point out it’s not a free thinking AI, it’s an entrapped corporate model they designed with preprogrammed biases. But I love arguing 😂.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

I can't imagine paying for AI when the open source tools have made it so easy to set up a model locally.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Don't be daft. The vast majority of people don't have the knowledge or resources to set that up locally.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 9 points 3 weeks ago

The author is right and wrong. Its subsidised but not by anthropic. The power users who use their plans to the limit are subsidised by the rest of the users. Im an AI hater but I do think anthropic will be profitable next year. Their revenue growth is insane and looks to just be getting started. Claude code took enterprise by storm and now cowork is out.

[–] WPSteam@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

AI Bubble burst coming sooner?

[–] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago

So much comments on just the title .... Could come from anthropic directly.

There is literally zero basis on the made claim in the article, just arbitrage calculations over supposed token consumptions under non stable test sets.

I have no idea if/how much these ~~stupid~~ fuckers spend to get more customers - and this "article" wasted a lot of time showing that they don't know either.

(Stupid is cut out because I don't think they they're stupid. Which makes it way worse in my book)

load more comments
view more: next ›