Crime shows; Pull up the satilight view. Zoom in. There, what's that spec? Enhance. There's our guy, move out!
this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
393 points (97.6% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
40145 readers
3490 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
It took me a while, but the payoff when it finally gets there is great.
Does a nude woman jiggling down a beach not count as NSFW anymore!?
Alright….. I fell for that.
This made me research the coastline paradox
I'm still squinting to see...
No I can't see it. Anyone willing to enlighten me?
Edit: nm, didn't realize it was a gif.
Same here.-
infinite real estate! how practical :D
Thanks I hate it
This successfully hurt my brain.
Reminds me of the conundrum of being unable to measure shoreline
Alan Davies (of qi fame) once made a documentary where he tried to measure the length of a piece of string, the shoreline issue also comes up.
-
Imagine an island (e.g: Bermuda, Hook Island, Sardinia, etc)
-
Draw a square or rectangle approximating all of the land not currently touching water (e.g: All pixels must not contain water)
-
Draw a larger red square encompassing the smaller red square or rectangle.
-
Subtract any brown, green, or "land" pixels, and add them to the total count of Box_1.
-
Remove green, blue and other "water" pixels from Box_2.
-
Your final result will be a red outline precisely mapping the coastline of the island in question. You can now measure distance by taking
pixelsand multiplying by the scale of the zoom-distance (parralax).
Over a very broad range of scales (like, from the scale of 10km down to the scale of 1mm) the number of boundary pixels of a natural shape like an island increases according to a power law as you increase the resolution.
This means that your approach doesn't give you an objective value because it depends so strongly on the resolution.
This way of computing the length of a boundary leads to the concept of box-counting dimension. When you increase the resolution of the pixel grid, you'll get a larger number of pixels on the boundary. Keep refining the grid many times. Graph the log of the total number of pixels against the log of the number of boundary pixels. The box counting dimension is the slope of that graph.
Why would we call this "dimension"? Because if you do this to a line, the slope is 1, and if you do it to a square, the slope is 2.
More information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_dimension?wprov=sfla1
This measurement is a factor of pixel size. As resolution increases and pixel width approaches 0, the shoreline length approaches infinity.
Though I guess you'd eventually run into the problem of clearly defining the shoreline once you're distinguishing between water molecules and grains of sand. is the water between the sand molecules part of the ocean? How concave is the boundary on the stretches between sand grains?
And of course, it's dynamic as tides and waves change it. And how does wet sand due to rain play into it - we're now having to differentiate based on salinity of water.
Oh that's funny. I see what you're doing 😆
Philosophers are no longer permitted on the beach 🚧 (/s)
Just get a small enough ruler either you'll measure the shoreline and disprove calculus or you'll solve quantum physics.
Well, if you get a small enough ruler you will already disprove quantum physics. No need to use it for anything.
At best you'll disprove shoreline.
You fucker
Fractal shorelines. Always a pleasure to behold.
hmm yes this beach is made of beach
Son of a beach
It's Fractal Beach, DUH!
Those are turtles!
Infuriating but pretty cool
Unexpected Dumpert.nl