this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
475 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

85571 readers
3974 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 145 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 80 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Fuck these incompetent headline writers who cant use units correctly. At this point they are doing this shit on purpose to ragebait people into reading the article. And they dont even explain what that headline is supposed to mean in the article. Does the output power ramp up that fast or do they mean that it can actually just output a lot of energy really fast?

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 66 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

I am also fascinated by the measurement “two soccer fields.” Americans largely play soccer on American football fields, so any American would just say “two football fields.” But everyone else hates calling it “soccer” and prefer to use metric rather than comparisons? This just seems like they chose all their measurements to be maximally irritating.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Calling it two football field would still work. Americans would think brown oblong ball field, everyone else would think black and white orb game. In in all cases they'd be thinking of essentially the same measurement.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 6 points 2 weeks ago

Right?! It’s just so puzzling a choice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, nobody play soccer in Switzerland, they play football, how would they know how big is soccer field?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Unleaded8163@fedia.io 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

My interpretation is that it can go from no output up to 1.2GW in milliseconds. Do most big batteries take more time to ramp up to high output?

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

These systems support a latent load so it’s not all at once. Something like this but at a massive scale.

https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva670a/slva670a.pdf

Very cool engineering.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Actually, the headline isn't wrong, you just read it wrong.

The article specifies:

  • 2.1 GWh total storage capacity
  • 1.2 GW peak output
  • can ramp up to that peak output within milliseconds

Every power source has a ramp up time. Ramping up e.g. a nuclear reactor can take hours, so if demand fluctuates it takes long for it to spin up.

This one here can ramp up almost instantly to cover for fluctuations in the network, especially those caused by the unpredictable nature of renewable power generators.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 66 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Goddammit, they are 0.01 Gigawatt short of time travel. 😋

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 27 points 2 weeks ago

It says "over 1.2" which means you know what some engineer gave the spec as.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

1.21 Jiggowatts?! Is there a GIF?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Great Scott!

[–] db2@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

You pronounce the G the same way as in gigawatt.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 45 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

The article doesn't explain the battery, making it a bullshit site if you ask me, here is what they are talking about:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanadium_redox_battery

'The vanadium redox battery (VRB), also known as the vanadium flow battery (VFB) or vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB), is a type of rechargeable flow battery which employs vanadium ions as charge carriers.[5] The battery uses vanadium's ability to exist in a solution in four different oxidation states to make a battery with a single electroactive element instead of two.[6]

For several reasons, including their relative bulkiness, vanadium batteries are typically used for grid energy storage, i.e., attached to power plants/electrical grids.[7] '

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I don't think I understand any better what the battery is then I did before. As per usual Wikipedia sucks at explaining concepts that you don't actually already understand.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

Here's the short version.

A normal battery is a sealed cell. It has a positive and negative electrode, with an electrolyte between them. Usually many layers of this. When you charge it, a chemical change happens. When you discharge it, that chemical change is undone.

A redox flow battery uses fixed electrodes, but a liquid electrolyte that can be pumped and stored. This means you can increase overall storage capacity simply by adding more electrolyte tanks, without needing more electrodes. Think of it like a generator with a bigger gas tank.

The whole vanadium thing is just one of the metals used in the battery. There's a few kind of redox flow batteries using different chemistries

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

Also there are hundreds of chemical combinations that produce electricity that we know about, and only a handful have been worked on for batteries. As reported in Harper's Magazine many years back, that is not indexed to enshitified search engines, because fuck you (us, google, et al talking.)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah wikipedia is hit or miss, especially as technical people like to show off their fancy words and explain things in ways only technical people understand.

But it's Vanadium, and you can look that up elsewhere. The first large industrial vanadium battery (if I recall,) was some years back, I think in WA State.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If I really want to feel stupid, I go to the Wikipedia article for some simple maths concept I thought I understood

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (16 children)

The headline looks wrong, but it actually isn't.

The article specifies:

  • Total capacity: 2.1GWh
  • Peak output: 1.2GW
  • Ramp up time: a few milliseconds

That's what the "within milliseconds" in the title refers to.

Every power generator has a ramp up time. Think the time it takes to start the engine in a diesel generator, until it spins up and is able to output peak power.

Nuclear reactors can hare ramp-up times of hours, in some conditions even days.

This thing here can go from zero to peak output within almost no time, which makes it perfect to balance the sometimes erratic and unpredictable generation fluctuations of renewable energy production.

For comparison, coal or gas power generators usually have large flywheels that, once spinning, react almost instantly to power fluctuations in the network by converting their motion to electricity or the other way round. If these coal or gas generators aren't running, they can't be used to balance the fluctuations in the network, so battery solutions like the one in OP are required to actively manage the network stability.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wow, that's almost 10% of a single datacenter

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

We don't know soccer fields around these parts...

[–] AbsoluteAggressor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Anything but the Imperial System huh?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

It's 1,435 US rods square, or 1,333.6 imperial rods, simple.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago
[–] metermatic26@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

able to output 1.2 GW within milliseconds

By exploding?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 weeks ago

They just had the first stone laying ceremony so that explains the new wave of publications on the project.

They are using a Vanadium flow battery by the company Invinity Energy Systems which is British-Canadian.

I'm a little unsure whether it's a good idea to combine this with a datacenter, I hope the datacenter bubble popping won't jeopardize the whole project.

[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 9 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

How big is a soccer field?

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Between 4000 and 11000 square meters

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

this will be by far the largest vanadium flow battery in the world, especially outside china

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Asked for comments, they kept saying "Rest assured there is no death ray plans"

(/j)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago

The Swiss are on the frontline of climate change seeing that it is destroying their mountains which in turn are destroying their villages. Sad times.

load more comments
view more: next ›