this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
466 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

85168 readers
3846 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 8 points 21 hours ago

The Swiss are on the frontline of climate change seeing that it is destroying their mountains which in turn are destroying their villages. Sad times.

[–] outerspace@lemmy.zip 4 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

What is a size of a soccer field

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 6 points 16 hours ago

A soccer field has the size of 63,693 Big Macs

https://joshclarkcalculates.com/

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

this will be by far the largest vanadium flow battery in the world, especially outside china

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 2 points 16 hours ago

Flow batteries eat lithium batteries on paper and they are so scalable too!

[–] Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Wow its much bigger than Chinas.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Oh wow! Switzerland! How did you get so big!?

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The article doesn't explain the battery, making it a bullshit site if you ask me, here is what they are talking about:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanadium_redox_battery

'The vanadium redox battery (VRB), also known as the vanadium flow battery (VFB) or vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB), is a type of rechargeable flow battery which employs vanadium ions as charge carriers.[5] The battery uses vanadium's ability to exist in a solution in four different oxidation states to make a battery with a single electroactive element instead of two.[6]

For several reasons, including their relative bulkiness, vanadium batteries are typically used for grid energy storage, i.e., attached to power plants/electrical grids.[7] '

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't think I understand any better what the battery is then I did before. As per usual Wikipedia sucks at explaining concepts that you don't actually already understand.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Here's the short version.

A normal battery is a sealed cell. It has a positive and negative electrode, with an electrolyte between them. Usually many layers of this. When you charge it, a chemical change happens. When you discharge it, that chemical change is undone.

A redox flow battery uses fixed electrodes, but a liquid electrolyte that can be pumped and stored. This means you can increase overall storage capacity simply by adding more electrolyte tanks, without needing more electrodes. Think of it like a generator with a bigger gas tank.

The whole vanadium thing is just one of the metals used in the battery. There's a few kind of redox flow batteries using different chemistries

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Also there are hundreds of chemical combinations that produce electricity that we know about, and only a handful have been worked on for batteries. As reported in Harper's Magazine many years back, that is not indexed to enshitified search engines, because fuck you (us, google, et al talking.)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

source: wikipedia (link above)

As per usual Wikipedia sucks at explaining concepts that you don’t actually already understand.

but it's true, i have encountered exactly this phenomenon many times :/

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah wikipedia is hit or miss, especially as technical people like to show off their fancy words and explain things in ways only technical people understand.

But it's Vanadium, and you can look that up elsewhere. The first large industrial vanadium battery (if I recall,) was some years back, I think in WA State.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

There is Wikipedia in Simple English, but they don't cover all topics.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If I really want to feel stupid, I go to the Wikipedia article for some simple maths concept I thought I understood

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

oh yeah, i read up yesterday what a polynomial is. hah.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah I think people who enjoy math and formulas and proofs also enjoy writing Wikipedia articles in the same way. I usually go to the Simple English Wikipedia for any math topics. And I got as far as calc 2 in college, so I'm no ignoramus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (15 children)

The headline looks wrong, but it actually isn't.

The article specifies:

  • Total capacity: 2.1GWh
  • Peak output: 1.2GW
  • Ramp up time: a few milliseconds

That's what the "within milliseconds" in the title refers to.

Every power generator has a ramp up time. Think the time it takes to start the engine in a diesel generator, until it spins up and is able to output peak power.

Nuclear reactors can hare ramp-up times of hours, in some conditions even days.

This thing here can go from zero to peak output within almost no time, which makes it perfect to balance the sometimes erratic and unpredictable generation fluctuations of renewable energy production.

For comparison, coal or gas power generators usually have large flywheels that, once spinning, react almost instantly to power fluctuations in the network by converting their motion to electricity or the other way round. If these coal or gas generators aren't running, they can't be used to balance the fluctuations in the network, so battery solutions like the one in OP are required to actively manage the network stability.

[–] Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's like a huge capacitor on my hobby electronics brain.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That's pretty much the job, except a billion times as large.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Perfect power source for a Death Star! The planet goes from zero to smithereens in milliseconds!

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 145 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

great scott

[–] Imperious_melange@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I wanted to research it myself since I didn't know how Redbox flow batteries operate. It is two giant tanks of liquid energy. When there's extra electricity from wind or solar, pumps move special vanadium-based liquids through a stack of cells, storing that energy as a chemical change. When electricity is needed later, the process runs in reverse and the liquids generate power for the grid. Unlike lithium batteries, the energy is stored in the liquid tanks, so making the battery bigger is mostly a matter of building larger tanks. The Swiss project will store about 2.1 GWh of energy—enough to help balance renewable power on a massive scale—and was chosen partly because redox-flow batteries are non-flammable, long-lasting, and can be cycled tens of thousands of times with little degradation

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

We don't know soccer fields around these parts...

[–] AbsoluteAggressor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anything but the Imperial System huh?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It's 1,435 US rods square, or 1,333.6 imperial rods, simple.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 80 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Fuck these incompetent headline writers who cant use units correctly. At this point they are doing this shit on purpose to ragebait people into reading the article. And they dont even explain what that headline is supposed to mean in the article. Does the output power ramp up that fast or do they mean that it can actually just output a lot of energy really fast?

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 66 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

I am also fascinated by the measurement “two soccer fields.” Americans largely play soccer on American football fields, so any American would just say “two football fields.” But everyone else hates calling it “soccer” and prefer to use metric rather than comparisons? This just seems like they chose all their measurements to be maximally irritating.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Actually, the headline isn't wrong, you just read it wrong.

The article specifies:

  • 2.1 GWh total storage capacity
  • 1.2 GW peak output
  • can ramp up to that peak output within milliseconds

Every power source has a ramp up time. Ramping up e.g. a nuclear reactor can take hours, so if demand fluctuates it takes long for it to spin up.

This one here can ramp up almost instantly to cover for fluctuations in the network, especially those caused by the unpredictable nature of renewable power generators.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Goddammit, they are 0.01 Gigawatt short of time travel. 😋

[–] turtlesareneat@piefed.ca 27 points 2 days ago

It says "over 1.2" which means you know what some engineer gave the spec as.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wow, that's almost 10% of a single datacenter

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›