this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
491 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

20430 readers
583 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 week ago

"Sometimes"? Lol.

[โ€“] Beth@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago

The truth during grad school when you get assigned more reading than is humanly possible. ๐Ÿฅฒ

[โ€“] friendly_ghost@beehaw.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

82% of researchers cite studies without reading them, I'm pretty sure I read this somewhere

[โ€“] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

You seemed to have forgotten to cite your source.

The actual number is estimated to be 37% according to one study. Nowhere near your number but still pretty high if you ask me. Source

[โ€“] Betch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I like bad citations on artificial skimmed milk as well.

I've even been known to use sci hub! I know right? Call the cops we've got a bad mother fucker right here

[โ€“] OpenStars@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago
[โ€“] Water_Melon_boy@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Im genuinely confused. Then why even cite those articles? Is there a hard rule for "You must cite this much articles" before publishing?

[โ€“] Allero@lemmy.today 4 points 6 days ago

Often yes, also, you may genuinely have to review A LOT of articles to make your point, and at that point, reading them in whole alone is gonna take you a few weeks time.

[โ€“] waldfee@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Water_Melon_boy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[โ€“] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 6 days ago

Sounds legit [1].

[1] img

I have my PhD now, and have published 3 conference papers and 2 journal articles. Iโ€™m not in academia now.

About half of my academic citations came from a poster I presented at a conference from before I started grad school. A poster that was never uploaded online, has no paper with it, and as far as I know, 15 people have seen in real life.

They were citing the online abstract, which has no real meat to it, just a single picture of my choosing and a paragraph of text or so.

Holy shit man. This project was barely science at this point. The methodology was soooo bad, and only made sense because I barely knew what I was doing and the researcher advising me was a bit out of their depth.

[โ€“] iconic_admin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The abstract is there for a reason. Shrug.