this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

News

36270 readers
2653 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Coldgoron@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Fucking do it you cowards.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Looking at companies like Blackstone, who buy up houses at auction, lightly flip them and put them back on the market as high-priced rentals. THEY'RE the big reason for the lack of affordable housing.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I mean, would it be better if we had a thousand mid-sized car dealership style house flippers rather than one singular monolith doing the same thing?

Blackstone agents are operating at a national scale in a market that's been flush with speculators and flippers going straight back to the colonial era. The high price of real estate is the consequence of housing as a commodity. There's no more free land to develop on the cheap and no more suburbs for young people to push out into searching for cheap new constructions. Take everyone at Blackstone out of the market tomorrow and you'll have a hundred smaller banks lining up to repeat their formula by the end of the month.

So long as cash is cheap, housing is in demand, and REITs are a thing, you're going to have businesses looking to profit off the difference between sale rates and rental rates as well as the gap between the prime rate and the going mortgage rate.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So why are you advocating for one?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

For the same reasons you are, i guess.

[–] Wutangforemer@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The solution is to make hoarding rental properties an unattractive investment. Put an escalating tax on owning multiple residences. If the 5th property is at 40% tax every year it's no longer a money maker in a competitive market. Put the money towards tax rebates for single mortgage interest. Now you have buyers back in the market and landlords looking to sell.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Put the money towards tax rebates for single mortgage interest.

Or just use it to construct new multi-family units that are sold at cost of construction.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yes it would be better. Monopolies are bad. Near monopolies are bad. The more market power a company gains the more they can charge for no reason at all except "fuck you pay me".

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Monopolies are bad.

Cartels are equally bad. Unless you change the economic incentives in home building and real estate speculation, you are - at best - changing the discrete number of people who get to participate in the profiteering. I don't particularly care if one national guy or fifty state guys get to ratchet up my housing prices. Big Number Goes Up all the same.

[–] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did you just scoff at the idea of competition improving a market?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

One big monopoly looks no different to the consumer than a cartel of mid-sized dealerships. You're not fixing the underlying speculative demand issue, just changing the number of participants in the speculative racket.