this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
247 points (76.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

42253 readers
480 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If all things were the same, but it was men who fell pregnant and gave birth, abortion clinics would be so standard they’d be on every corner, like McDonald’s. In fact, it’d be a sign of status to go to one.

Male 1: “I’m just off to the abortion clinic real quick.”

Male 2: “Oh nice, King. You’ve been busy.”

Male 1 leaves.

Male 3: “He’s so cool.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ougie@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Working people of all genders are not getting paid enough.

[–] tiny_hedgehog@piefed.social 1 points 43 minutes ago

This is 100% true and factual.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

If males were going pregnant they'd be females

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Cool angle, but it breaks down biologically.

[–] tiny_hedgehog@piefed.social -2 points 8 hours ago

Obviously 🤣

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

If all things were the same, but it was men who fell pregnant and gave birth, well then all things but the one would be the same. Because it clearly says that all things, besides the one, would be the same.

[–] LoveRainbow@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

We would just have hysterectomies. Why the fuck would we want such a disadvantage?

[–] tiny_hedgehog@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago

Believe it or not, there are some men who want kids.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Shame women don't have the same drive and ingenuity

[–] tiny_hedgehog@piefed.social -3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

That wasn’t my point. My point was that the world is run by men. Policymakers and politicians are, in general, men. And since abortion is about giving women freedom over their bodies and life decisions, (most) men don’t allow that. Therefore there’s a very unfair disconnect. My point was that if men were the target of anti-abortion policies, then such policies would by and large not exist.

ETA: As another commenter pointed out, perhaps statistically most men are pro-choice, but unfortunately in general the backwards few who go into and succeed in politics are the ones who make the call.

[–] nitroemdash@lemmy.wtf 17 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

In year 2000 poll, percentage of pro-choice people was 49% among both men and women. In 2006 it was 51% for both. Since 1995 and until 2020, the difference never exceeded 8%, peaking at 20% in 2025 correlating with political polarisation, with year 2010 men responding more pro-choice than women respondents by 5% (47% vs. 42%)‡.

Partisan divide was always more influential than the gender one, with pro-choice stance being 47% less popular among republican women than among democratic women; 42% gap for R/D men in 2020–2021 poll‡. If cisgender men could give birth, it wouldn't have more influence on their abortion stance than overall political beliefs.

‡ Gender Gaps on Abortion Reach Historic Highs | Gallup, June 2025

[–] Scrogu@lemmy.zip 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If males gave birth then it would be females that competed for access to us and became physically stronger than males. The only thing that would change is the name of the physically and politically powerful gender.

It wouldn't make society better. Hyenas have bigger stronger dominant females and they have no utopia. Seahorse males give birth, they are the more maternal, females cheat on them.

Only fundamental difference between male and female is size and motility of sex cells. Only reason animals like us vary in size and strength is due to difference in offspring investment strategies.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

if both sexes were hermaphroditic, then there would be less conflict as in other animals whom posesses both sexes gonads.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

What is up with Lemmy, men and pregnancy??
Did I miss the new meta?

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/69748408

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

idiots tend to propagate stupid ideas because it makes them feel smart.

it's not like this 'if men got pregnant' line of thinking is anything new, it's been around since forever.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago

Someone is running a propaganda campaign, most likely. Shaping hearts and minds.

[–] Zeddex@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was thinking the same thing. First something about moths(I don't really get what that was about), then Loss, now this. What's next?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

Luigi board? /j

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is it a hostility to some essential concept of women, or a way to devalue reproduction caring and domestic labor? Which force is stronger, more original?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This would be such an extreme warping of reality that it’s essentially impossible to make any assumptions about what it would entail like this. You know the joke about a time traveller moving a rock? Yeah, that times a million.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This here. If men would give birth, they would be women.

So much of what makes up the differences between the male and female experiences is down to the fact that women give birth.

If it was the men who gave birth and not the women, we'd have pretty much everything we have now, just gender-reversed.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This assumes it simply reverses the roles so men give birth and women don't.

What if we all gave birth?

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In that case, there likely wouldn't be two separate genders at all, because why would there be? Hermaphrodite species exist, and they usually just have a single gender.

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 22 hours ago

*sex

sexes are not the same as genders and should not be called genders

what if we all gave birth 👉👈

(???)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pudutr0n@lemmy.world 103 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Did you know grey hyenas have a matriarchal society? Females are more aggressive, dominant and hold different social status to males. They aren't less horrible than patriarchal hyenas.

The problem isn't the males or the females. It's that they're hyenas.

[–] ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And they give birth through a pseudo penis that is torn apart.

I don’t think it brings anything useful to the conversation, but it is an interesting fact.

[–] Pudutr0n@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

This conversation is now about hyenas.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] arin@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (12 children)

If men gave birth they would be called women

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Most likely. Let's make it happen!

[–] Michal@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

No, but they (we) would be more careful about contraception.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If men bore the children then women would have to do the sexual pursuing. The human race would quickly die out.

[–] polariscap@lemmy.cafe -1 points 2 hours ago

I wonder if maybe women would have more time and energy to do the actual pursuing then, instead of being sidelined, oppressed, saddled with the labor of care work which is necessary for the continuation of the human race. Are you saying birthing men wouldn’t take on that care work?

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 1 points 23 hours ago

https://spot.colorado.edu/~heathwoo/Phil160,Fall02/thomson.htm -- ANYTHING less is denying the personhood of anyone that can get pregnant.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

No, there wouldn't be.

The policy would be the same, because the issue of abortion makes the two ruling parties way too much money to make it worth legalizing or banning completely. Hell, when the leak of the Roe repeal occurred, Democrats raked in $80,000,000 alone. A cool $80,000,000 and all they had to do was pretend to care about abortion by making a tweet or something.

OP is incorrect.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Clearly, we have to genetically modify all men to be hyenas, so that they can experience the Miracle of Life through their dicks. /S.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

men have the anti-mullerien hormone from the Y chromosone to stop female secondary characteristics during fetal development. rarely there are disorders that prevent that gene from activating or it goes missing and they develop as a female, minus having the extra biologicl X CHromosone.

Androgen insensitivity syndrome is fascinating. Plenty of people with it grow up female and have no idea their genes are different, until they reached puberty and never get their period.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

All this post proves is that people have no fucking clue what abortion entails

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Having been present for an abortion please do tell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 6244901@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

🤣🤣🤣🤣

[–] ennof@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

If all things were the same, but it was men who fell pregnant and gave birth, all things would be different.

load more comments
view more: next ›