this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
163 points (78.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

42242 readers
857 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If all things were the same, but it was men who fell pregnant and gave birth, abortion clinics would be so standard they’d be on every corner, like McDonald’s. In fact, it’d be a sign of status to go to one.

Male 1: “I’m just off to the abortion clinic real quick.”

Male 2: “Oh nice, King. You’ve been busy.”

Male 1 leaves.

Male 3: “He’s so cool.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 7 minutes ago

technically they can give birth under unusual circumstances.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 38 minutes ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago) (2 children)

Clearly, we have to genetically modify all men to be hyenas, so that they can experience the Miracle of Life through their dicks. /S.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 5 minutes ago* (last edited 5 minutes ago)

men have the anti-mullerien hormone from the Y chromosone to stop female secondary characteristics during fetal development. rarely there are disorders that prevent that gene from activating or it goes missing and they develop as a female, minus having the extra biologicl X CHromosone.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

I need to know more about this.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago

If men bore the children then women would have to do the sexual pursuing. The human race would quickly die out.

[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

This would be such an extreme warping of reality that it’s essentially impossible to make any assumptions about what it would entail like this. You know the joke about a time traveller moving a rock? Yeah, that times a million.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This here. If men would give birth, they would be women.

So much of what makes up the differences between the male and female experiences is down to the fact that women give birth.

If it was the men who gave birth and not the women, we'd have pretty much everything we have now, just gender-reversed.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

This assumes it simply reverses the roles so men give birth and women don't.

What if we all gave birth?

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 2 points 4 hours ago

ok so i might be wrong here, but abortions can be safely and reliably carried out with pills, right?

and it's very difficult to actually check every package and letter that is sent whether it contains illegal pills. at least that's my guess. so would it be possible to buy abortion pills from the netherlands, the same way that one can buy drugs?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago

No, there wouldn't be.

The policy would be the same, because the issue of abortion makes the two ruling parties way too much money to make it worth legalizing or banning completely. Hell, when the leak of the Roe repeal occurred, Democrats raked in $80,000,000 alone. A cool $80,000,000 and all they had to do was pretend to care about abortion by making a tweet or something.

OP is incorrect.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

If men gave birth they would be called women

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 4 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

You're joking but maybe that's exactly the reason why men always had it easier in history. They didn't have to spend 9 months × child suffering + menstrual cycle every month

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Then no one would have problems getting an abortion

[–] arin@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pudutr0n@lemmy.world 78 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

Did you know grey hyenas have a matriarchal society? Females are more aggressive, dominant and hold different social status to males. They aren't less horrible than patriarchal hyenas.

The problem isn't the males or the females. It's that they're hyenas.

[–] EyIchFragDochNur@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Pudutr0n@lemmy.world 1 points 53 minutes ago

Are you not?

[–] ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world 48 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

And they give birth through a pseudo penis that is torn apart.

I don’t think it brings anything useful to the conversation, but it is an interesting fact.

[–] Pudutr0n@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago

This conversation is now about hyenas.

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You're way behind. That's why laws approved are no longer named after what they really do. Who decides that a specific law harms a specific population? The same people approving them... So... Yeah.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 8 points 9 hours ago

If men could give birth everyone would tell them to man the fuck up and deal with it.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 18 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

You never see legislation on condoms.

Just birth control.

When it's a man's choice it's uncontested.

But a woman shouldn't have the same autonomy.

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Not here but in Africa the Catholic Church pushed for total bans on birth control, condoms included, official in some places and socially in others. The result was huge spikes in HIV across swaths of Africa.

Also don't be surprised if there is eventually a ban on all both control, not because of actual theocratic desire, but because billionaires don't want us to have any. Deep down they know LLMs will not lead to AI powerful enough to replace all workers, like they were hoping for a few years back, so they know they need human slaves. They use evangelical idiocy to spur up theocratic chuds and convince the masses, they're one of them. But these assholes have no set ethics or morals, good or bad, just greed and powerlust.

I bet they are planning all sorts of ways to force us to have future slaves for them. Not saying it will work, I think population decline is unavoidable and not that bad tbh, but they will absolutely try.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I know project 2025 has plans for forcing teenage girls to have pregnancy.

Which is illogical even by their standards as babies more likely to be still born and premature from teenage mothers. And pregnant teen girls more likely to have complications resulting in death and permanent sterility.

We gotta get rid of these insane psychopaths before they destroy the planet and everything on it.

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 6 points 11 hours ago

Condoms are balloons that just fit your penis, lol. Jk. This world is f-d up.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Polling suggests that around 70% of women and 50% of men support abortion, though. If those stats simply reversed then nothing really changes.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Please. Men vastly outnumber women in the legislature. If those numbers flipped there would be DRASTIC change.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Assuming a ~20% shift towards pro-choice opinions I would expect more pro-choice laws, not an orgy of casual abortions.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 5 points 9 hours ago

Dude, this is older than you. It's older than me.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 19 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

It’s not that simple and I say that as a woman. It’s about ownership of the idea that having kids is a “right” even if no one likes you enough to want to carry your genes forward, putting health and body at risk to make it so. In addition to the lifelong commitment childbearing requires.

The fact that you have to take some degree of ownership of another human being to treat childbirth this way is obscene, but here we are. Roe fell.

It’s more about entitlement. I can’t conceive of doing the same in reverse positions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sjmarf@sh.itjust.works 16 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago

Boynecologist and boybortion should be Guynecologist and aboytion.

Just saying.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›