this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
61 points (87.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39722 readers
1821 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hear me out on this, please.

Let's say that I spend $5k on health insurance in a year, but don't go to the doctor or have any medical issues in that year. Where does my money go? It disappears. I basically just gave away my money, and received nothing in return. However, if I took that $5k and simply put it into a personal savings account instead of giving it away to a health insurance provider - that money stays right there if and whenever I decide to use it. It even collects interest.

I realize that with a health insurance provider, you're (supposedly) getting discounted rates on medical services - but if your money is just disappearing into thin air if you don't happen to need those medical services in a given year, are you really saving money? It just seems like a really big scam to me - what am I missing?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Because you probably won't get a multi-million-dollar cancer, but might. Or, looked at another way, someone will get cancer, and with insurance everyone is just a little less well off, instead of a few people being absolutely ruined.

I know little about American healthcare, but that's how insurance in general works. (From what I've heard there's also a premium that just goes to anticompetitive bullshit in that specific case)

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

This is what I do. It's far cheaper then any level of insurance i can purchase, especially since no matter what i can't cover my significant other.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago

So being Canadian I have a different outlook. My province used to charge $1500 o'er year for health coverage so that everything was "free" at point of service. Then we changed political parties and they dropped it to $750 per year, years later to $0 per year. (The idea being if you are struggling then any monthly payment could would be a hardship).

So now we pay nothing for healthcare and my icome taxes went up $270 on first 50K, but at least I'm not paying $1500 or $750.

So cheap health care and still save 5K for retirement

[–] DougPiranha42@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I don’t see this in other replies, even though it’s incredibly obvious, so: insurance for most people comes as a benefit from work or from the government. So you get something, you take it. Your question only applies to those who are not eligible for any kind of subsidized health insurance, which is rare for those who could otherwise afford one.

[–] Balisada@piefed.social 11 points 11 hours ago

I have Acute Myloid Leukemia.

In the State of Oregon, to treat that with a side trip through "lets get a bone marrow transplant land" it costs $2 million dollars.

I had a doctor state that they don't know what causes Leukemia, but it's not genetic, so there is nothing I could have done to prevent it and my family didn't give it to me.

Are you going to save up $2 million dollars in case you get diagnosed with something that does not have any symptoms? Because I didn't have any. One month I was fine, and the next I couldn't get to from my car to my desk at work without stopping somewhere along the way to rest.

To a certain degree, I see your point about paying for something that you are not really using. It sucks. But if you need it, it is really nice that you already have it.

There is a reason why some people literally go bankrupt with medical bills. Even with insurance, it can still get pretty costly.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 50 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Let try this, why don't we pool our money into a big savings account of pretax dollars for everyone in the entire country and add a supervising org that works with hospital networks to keep cost low through collective bargaining. At some point we the hospital networks become a single national network.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 30 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Ok so I hear you, but where do I get to deny claims and make $638,384,274,836.67 for myself while you die of a completely treatable disease? It's not a fair system to me so I'm going to ~~bribe~~ lobby Congress and get my way.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The fix is clearly to have a group of non-medical people in charge of that pooled pot of money who can deny payments for arbitrary reasons.
I think this is the most sane solution

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Most sane seems a bit of a stretch, but I will grant you that given the current system sane-er definitely works.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

Lol well we have video from last year that showed what we should do with you in that case.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 61 points 18 hours ago

Because hospitals charge a thousands dollars for an aspirin.

Insurance only has to pay like a dollar. But YOU would be lucky to haggle it down to $40.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 18 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

A single complex surgery can have billed charges approaching $1,000,000, and that's if they will even perform the surgery if you're ininsured. Your $5,000 a year won't even cover the interest charges and your only way out if the hospital won't reduce the debt is bankruptcy.

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

Your idea is to not have insurance. This makes sense for expenses you can cover from your own savings. It makes less sense for expenses you can't cover from savings. This is why insurance was created, it is a way to pool catastrophic risks where the majority who won't need it (as much) cover the costs of the minority that does.

For health insurance specifically, it doesn't make economic sense to not cover the entire population, which is why top economies implement such a system in various ways.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

As others have said, insurance is for covering the catastrophe that you can’t, but also …..

My teen recently had a paperwork issue refilling a prescription. Originally they couldn’t find our insurance info and tried to charge $335. However they eventually did, and it was just $30 copay

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

You could have my problem where my prescription costs $190 for 3 months with insurance and $40 for 3 months without.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You have the option of not going through insurance. I do have that situation, almost …. The reason we goto the pharmacy we do is they have a list of common medicines they decided are at their cost. My insurance may decide a medicine is worthy of a $30 copay, but they say “cash price $6”

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Yeah I know, but the situation is absurd.

[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 25 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Insurance is always a technical gamble. If you need it for something moderate to big you'll easily run up a much higher bill than 5k. Could even be enough to eat the years of savings you had.

If you had paid that 5k that year, you'd still have your savings.

[–] obelisk_complex@piefed.ca 6 points 14 hours ago

Until we get to the total plan limits. They don't cover costs to infinity, you know. And for something like cancer treatment, most plans don't actually offer enough coverage to sustain it for years, so you're still on the hook for tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars after all is said and done.

[–] roguelazer@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Because everything costs more than you think. Having a child without insurance is often over $100,000. Any visit to the ER for an emergency? $25,000 to get in the door and often millions of dollars if you need lots of interventions. Heck, even with insurance, chronic conditions often cost thousands of dollars per year. Even simple procedures like my daughter's tympanostomy tubes have self-pay prices in the tens of thousands of dollars.

[–] Ixoid@aussie.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

You may have conflated 'costs' with 'profit' - countries with actual healthcare don't allow providers to inflate their costs like the USA does.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Ask yourself what happens if you get diagnosed with cancer in that first year instead of staying healthy.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Spend the savings account on a sweet funeral?

[–] Crozekiel@piefed.zip 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, $5k doesn't buy you a sweet funeral. You're lucky to be cremated and remains in a plain plastic coated cardboard box for $5k.

$5k might cover the costs of moving a country with proper healthcare though.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds very expensive there.. Pretty sure funerals relatives of mine have had were priced in 2-3 digits.

[–] Crozekiel@piefed.zip 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

That is an extremely foreign concept to my indoctrinated american brain... My grandmother pre-paid for her entire funeral, casket and burial plot included, back in the early 1980s and didn't pass until 2005. It cost her like $3000 in 1980s money and we were told at the time the same arrangements would have cost about $25000 in 2005. Another family member died that same year and was cremated and that cost about $4000 just for the basic plain box mentioned above. I'm sure today it is at least double that... (guessing based on how much more EVERYTHING else costs vs 20 years ago).

[–] akwd169@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago

Jeez just haul me out to the woods and plant a tree overtop of me, I need nothing but to return my borrowed stardust back to nature

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 15 hours ago

You can spend a few thousand here, but at that point you are getting a fairly large service and feeding everyone too. Burial is also another way to add a lot to the cost.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 9 points 17 hours ago

The problem is it's not 5k, it's like 500k and you won't save that in time. Some people do what you say and as long as it's checkups and colds they're fine, but if they get in an accident and need surgery, they can't pay the whole bill. Insurance doesn't pay it either, they negotiate. But the hospital won't negotiate with you like they will with them. You get full bill.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

My cancer surgery this year and my wife's hospitalization combined to hit $600,000.

You aren't paying that with a savings account.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I am also not paying that with insurance. My rattlesnake bite cost $43,000. Insurance covered almost $3,000.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Our out of pocket maximum for the year is $6,500. We hit that instantly.

[–] searabbit@piefed.social 3 points 15 hours ago

Here's an honest answer from someone with a chronic illness. In the US, we don't have real health insurance, so it's more like you're paying into a racket for some discounts and peace of mind in case you have a sudden acute condition. If you're lucky enough to be able to work, you will (hopefully) have an option between the ~~cartels~~ insurance providers. If you're a betting man, you should pick the lowest premium plan with an HSA, which is essentially what you're describing, plus you don't get taxed on the money.

But people will say, what if you get cancer the first year? You're screwed anyway, because it's not like the insurance just goes "oh I'm so sorry you got cancer, don't you worry, we'll cover all the costs." No, of course not. They'll fight you every step of the way, so at that point you are just better off going to another country and paying for treatment out of pocket.

But wait, other countries don't have the same new or experimental treatment options as we do. Well, insurance often doesn't cover those anyway, so if you are pretty desperate and you truly need those, you either fight for coverage, and I hope you haven't lost too much of your support system from the isolation of poor health because the stress of doing it alone may kill you regardless, or you pay out of pocket until you go broke.

There is also sometimes the option of medicaid or going on disability. You may go on medicaid anyway because good luck keeping a job and managing doctors appointments (oh my specialist can't see me for another 6 months? Yeah put me on the wait list for cancellations), medications, and fighting the aforementioned insurance denials. Medicaid at least is actual state sponsored insurance, but remember Cs get degrees and As get high pay. As don't typically accept medicaid pay rates unless you live near a big research hospital and can get their attention. Regarding disability, you shouldn't really consider it unless you're hitting rock bottom because it takes years to get on it only to have your savings capped to an insulting level that keeps you perpetually impoverished.

So you're not really missing anything because it is one big racket.

[–] roger.wood@feddit.online 8 points 18 hours ago

Well yes, but our system is rigged against us. HSA accounts are kind of what you're looking for.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago

That money went into the care of others who got sick, administrative costs, and because everything is for profit, you helped pay for someone's vacation home. Eventually, if you get sick, the premiums of other people pay are used for your care. Insurance operates because not everyone needs to use it at the same time. If everyone needed to use the insurance at the same time, the insurance company would not be able to pay for care and would go bankrupt.

The same thing happened during the sub-prime mortgage crisis of 2008. Banks lent people money with variable interest rates to purchase homes. (These were predatory loans, and they were being given to people with questionable credit who otherwise would not be able to get a home loan.) The banks then turned all of those variable rate home loans into housing related securities, which let investors in those programs earn interest on buying a tiny slice of the mortgages. When banks raised the interest rates on the people with those home loans, suddenly people couldn't afford their mortgage payments and defaulted. Many of those variable rate loans were required to get mortgage insurance to protect the lender against the loan takers defaulting on the loan. Those mortgage insurance companies were flooded with claims. AIG, one such company, faced billions in losses from credit default swaps and its securities lending program, pushing the firm to the brink of bankruptcy.

Back to health insurance talk. As a consumer, the nice thing about medical insurance is it caps your costs due to a catastrophic event via something called a maximum out-of-pocket, (Max OOP.) Assuming you have a deductible, the money you spend to meet the deductible, and copays you pay after that count towards the Max OOP. When you hit the max OOP, you're covered in full, for the rest of the calendar year. I don't have a deductible; my max OOP is $6,350. If I spend $6,350 on co-payments, my co-payments stop until December 31, and it resets when it rolls over to the next calendar year. Without insurance, a catastrophic health event would cost hundreds of thousands of dollars and would absolutely bankrupt me. $6,350 would also put me under financial strain, but it's something I could recover from financially, and probably wouldn't have to file bankruptcy over.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I see two things you might be missing.

  1. The insurance company negotiates prices for services. Without insurance, you will likely get billed more than what the insurance would pay.

  2. Liquid savings accounts are worthless anymore. Unless you're investing that money, you won't see any significant interest on it. Maybe a few pennies a year.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't call savings accounts worthless. You can still get 3-4% APY on a HYSA or CD.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

From what I understand, and I'll be honest, finance is not my department, those generally don't allow you to pull the money out whenever you need it. They would need to have access to those funds if they intend to pay their medical bills with it.

[–] DougPiranha42@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Confirming that you are simply wrong. There are a ton of high yield savings accounts, by mainstream banks, local credit unions and fintech startups, pick your preference; you can deposit and withdraw any amount any time and interest is calculated daily, paid out monthly. Rates are not fix, they have been hovering 3-5% in the past 10ish years.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

There was a federal law called Regulation D that limited withdrawals across all of your savings accounts to 6 per month. That was suspended in 2020 due to COVID and continues to be suspended until this day, but some individual banks still enforce it privately so check your T's and C's of your financial institution.

Although imo 6 withdrawals from savings per month should be more than enough.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

That is not the case with mine. It's about 3.5% variable, sometimes over 4%, plain cash savings account in the US. I can transfer from savings to checking at another bank on the same day and withdraw whatever I want. As the other reply from cattywampas said, the number of withdrawals is limited but that's no issue for me.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 17 hours ago

Unless you've committed to a 5 or 10 year CD, you probably can defer the payments or split them until the CD matures so you don't forfeit the interest. Also, for proper CD planning, it's probably best to use a ladder strategy where you have multiple CDs and staggered so one matures every year for you to decide if you need the cash or can reinvest it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

In broad terms, you don't buy insurance because it has a positive expected return.

You buy it to hedge against risk, to spread risk out.

Let's say


completely pulling numbers out of the air


that there are 10,000 houses in a town. On average, one of them burns down each year.

What the insurer does is take money from all of those people, pool it, and pay out to the one person who gets impacted.

You buy insurance and pay maybe, I don't know, 1/5000th the price of the house per year. In the long run, you'd expect to come out behind on that, since that's more than 1/10,000th the price of the house.

But...people don't necessarily value things linearly.

In the absence of insurance, the person whose house burns down is out a house, which he may consider to be really bad. He may not consider 1/10,000th the price of a house a year or 1 in 10,000 possibility of losing his housing entirely to be equivalent.

If you'd rather have a predictable expense that you can plan around, that's what insurance provides for.

There can be some other benefits


like, an insurer has time to evaluate relevant factors, like to determine things that might reduce fire risk and to say that you have lower rates if you do X, Y, and Z. An individual probably doesn't have the data or time to do that. But it's really the risk mitigation that's the driving force behind insurance.

In general, you want to take the highest deductible you can afford to take on insurance. If you can afford to cover a $5k unexpected expense, then you want a $5k deductible, so that in the event of an incident where insurance pays out, you pay the first $5k. That way, you're not paying for risk mitigation that you don't care about, on that first $5k. Your rates will be lower.

If you can afford to cover an unexpected expense at any level, then you may well not want insurance at all, since you don't need risk mitigation.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 5 points 18 hours ago

There is such a thing as a tax deductible HSA (Health Savings Account)

[–] valar@lemmy.ca 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Insurance is a scam, pure and simple. But the system is set up to force you into it.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

For profit insurance is a scam.

If someone is profiting off any insurance system, then it's a scam.

It shouldn't be a service, it should be a communal safety net.

Like, insuring a 2 million super car shouldn't be on everyone, but one of the largest parts of auto insurance is people needing healthcare after. Take that out of the equation and auto insurance becomes more sensible.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

Your money goes to all people that got sick and needed that money for treatment that year. And when you get sick their money goes to cover your expenses. If you never need it, congratulations, you're a very lucky and/or healthy person and you can feel good about the fact that you helped a lot of people get treated. If you do need it, there's money to cover your expenses, even if the cost is more than what you ever paid in total.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

From what I understand, aside from what everyone is saying, the insurance companies end up not lowering prices but raising them. The hospital essentially makes up inflated pricing (the $600 aspirin joke) and then the insurance company fights for a discount of that price. It's scumbags ripping off scumbags at that point, but I'd almost be convinced that prices would be lower if there was no fat cow insurance company to scam out of as much money as possible.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 2 points 17 hours ago

It all comes down to the dreaded ER visit that could be deep into 6 figures+. That's honestly the only reason I have insurance. I actually needed it a couple weeks ago too.

load more comments
view more: next ›