this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
230 points (99.6% liked)

Privacy

4551 readers
312 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pandora's iPhone, by Stuart Carlson, 2016. Still spot-on in 2026:

A backdoor for the good guys simply does not exist. Once you build it, hackers walk through, authoritarian governments walk through, and the rest follows.

The UK is pressuring for chat control right now. EU Chat Control initiatives keep popping up. We need to keep saying NO to this!

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hobovision@mander.xyz 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

> Implying the FBI is not part of a repressive regime.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 20 points 22 hours ago

The "Backdoor for the Good Guys" is a myth.

No "Good Guys" ask for such an absurd vulnerability into someone's personal digital existence. Every single person in power asking for it knows what they're doing.

[–] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 day ago

And it is not only this.
It also has the danger to invoke "chilling effects", so self-censorship in normally private environments.
Chat control and similar ideas are anti-democratic and suppressive at their very core.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 12 points 23 hours ago

Thank goodness hackers can't fit through that door so it's perfectly safe!

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Given that the organizations like the FBI can be politically weaponized, governmental use of backdoors is just as fraught as their use by hacker groups.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 10 points 22 hours ago

I was gonna say FBI is more of a threat than hackers are this point.

[–] ztwhixsemhwldvka@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago
[–] lena 6 points 23 hours ago

Anything but etc.!