Greentext

Kissless, handholdless virgin

Feminoid, female humanoid

Definitely offered an abundance of context for their conversational partner’s curt responses. You don’t even need the rebuttal greentext, they’ve already confirmed everything.

What does it mean?

Oh

He isn't inept. He does it on purpose and uses autism as a shield.

He's the type of person who revels in making other people uncomfortable (especially women) because he's very immature and going through his "poke the bear" phase.

We all go through that phase to some extent, where we push back against the world to see how far we can go before the world slaps back and teaches us how to behave. Some kids to grafitti on walls, others shoplift once or twice, some spew edgy opinions, others refuses to listen to authority figures etc etc. But at some point most people grow out of it and settle into the world and become more mature.

Some people, however, feel the need to go further than others and poke the bear extra hard. Sometimes they wake up after a slap, other times they don't, because they never mature enough to settle in to society. They keep being "rebels" to provoke a reaction because it gives them a thrill. Makes them feel somehow important or different and thus better than the rest of us.

It's a very sad way to live and some people get stuck living like that and never grow out of it. Hopefully, this Anon will mature eventually and forever cringe when he looks back at this period of his life. But his autism has nothing to do with this behavior he is displaying. It's just a way for him to not hold himself accountable for his bad behavior, as people like him are apt to do.

There's no level of autism that can get you to think that talking about molesting baby Hitler would be a good idea, especially with a girl that anon is presumably trying to impress. There's a reason that anon is on 4chan, and it's not just autism.

don't kill hitler, go further back and kill Alexander the Great

say goodbye to the HRE and all the catholic romaboos that followed

I'd let him be, he prevented a worse genocide by giving America the ick of eugrnics.

Ootl, who was?

“…I molest baby Hitler to stop the holocaust”

~queenhawlsera@sh.itjust.works

Thank you for your service

it’s also actually relatively easy to just not go there

Into neurotypical society or broaching baby molestation? Because I’d have a harder time avoiding one than the other, but I won’t judge my experiences as the only correct ones.

One act is inherently sadistic, the other isn't. It's very simple.

I'm still a big fan of the scenario where you take baby Hitler and give him a lovely childhood and set him on a positive path instead the path he ended up on. I sometimes wonder what would have happened if Putin had had and safe and loving childhood as well. The shit he went through in his formative years are directly tied to the creature we are all witnessing and suffering from today.

Society disensitises us to the idea of killing bad people, all the movies and TV you watch and games you play will have you kill someone because they're an enemy or a bad person. No media justifies the idea of molesting someone because they're a bad guy.

Typical people deal with rape, murder is far rarer so there’s less “reality” to it. Go to a war torn country and you’d get a different response. Possivly “who is hitler?”

But, more specifically, the kill baby Hitler question already exists in the social ether to be finished through call and respond. Branching into molestation requires recontextualization which pulls us into reality. It’s no longer call and respond, and you’ve just asked someone if they’d molest a baby.

Frankly, I don't see how killing baby Hitler is not... extremely obviously morally superior to molesting baby Hitler.

You can kill anybody nearly instantly.

'Molestation' implies... over a signifcant amount of time.

It also implies that this is done in lieu of directly killing baby Hitler.

So you've now generated an even more fucked up Hitler.

Who will... regardless of how their time travel affrcted lifepath plays out... well they'll have been molested. As a core memory.

That... seems to me to be less moral, causes more Hitler-suffering, unnecessarily.

You've minimized total suffering, via killing baby Hitler.

... this is all assuming that just... doing either of these things somehow results in Hitler not coming to power, WW2 doesn't happen, holocaust doesn't happen.

Frankly I also do not see anything near a guaranteed causality to 'molesting baby Hitler' -> 'somehow WW2 does not happen'.

Whereas it is at least semi-plausible that killing baby Hitler at least could result in ww2/holocaust not happening... I guess the ... Strasserists just stay in control of the Nazis? And do not have a strangely charismatic firebrand to massively expand the movement?

So it also just seems very impractical, unlikely that molesting baby Hitler would achieve the presumably desired aim.

And it also assumes that these are your only two possible actions.

Of course the entire thing is ludicrous is the sense of hinging on perfect foreknowledge, and time travel, which is fundamentally paradoxical, and/or results quantum suicide/immortality type nonsense, and/or in the Red Alert timeline.

Oh god, and we essentially have to assume that this will be the only possible instance of time travel that ever happens, otherwise we potentially get into a kind of battling time travellers scenario ala whatever the fuck the Terminator series is doing now, and/or just a reality where many people can do time travel.

Why not just do... teleportation, and either kill or molest Trump or Netanyahu, right now?

I think I'd again conclude that telefragging them would be morally superior.