this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
603 points (99.0% liked)

Just billionaire things

223 readers
675 users here now

Post things your (least) fav billionaire does.

This used to be the Elon Musk sub, but in an attempt to boost engagement, we have engaged a new pathway.

You can post anything related to billionaires here.

Tags: Tesla, paypal, spaceX, neuralink, The Boring Company.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

Little bit of additional context:

5% of 311 billion is 15.55 billion.

57M is about 0.018% of 311 billion.

311 billion is an obscene amount of money.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 10 points 8 hours ago

Don't do evil? More like pretend to care about people until you become an oligarch. We have seen it in Sergey, we have seen it in Elon, we have seen it in Sam. It is the same game all the time.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 36 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

He's just standing there. No helmet. No armor. Just standing there being evil.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

I've got this nice armoured car that he can have. I've cunningly disguised it as a woodchipper, all he needs to do is jump right in.
Or be pushed inside. Or dangled and then slowly lowered into it.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago
[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

How about we start eating them now?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 7 points 9 hours ago

They'll need some tenderizing first.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 20 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Why is he dressed like an evil 4th Amigo?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 14 points 9 hours ago

Because he's a rich dipshit.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 74 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

From "don't be evil" to "be extra evil" in a few short years. But this doesn't mean he's somehow an exceptionally terrible person. Pretty much anyone who gets into a position like this will turn out this way. Which is to say, billionaires simply shouldn't exist.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 27 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Man, just once, I'd like to see a billionaire that decides to spend enormous amounts of money on cool shit, without also being a terrible human being. Basically thinking of Musk, but the version of him that most people thought he was back when SpaceX was first making waves. That was all ruined by the fact that he turned out to be a Nazi.

Like, if this guy has $300 billion, I wish he would just get it in his head one day that he wants to see real high speed rail in the US and just throw $100 billion at it to force it to happen. Not because it's profitable, but because it's cool, and having $200 billion vs having $300 billion makes absolutely no difference to anything.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No one who gets to have that enormous amount of money in the first place is a decent enough person to spend it in good will.

Any person with 100 million dollars is set for life. Having more than that is simply greed.

A person with the funding and genuine intent to have "the boring company" develop and execute the Hyperloop would have done it by now, instead of having it just be tubes with fuckin Teslas in them

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 hours ago

Unless you inherit it, and somehow beat the odds by not being a piece of shit like your parents

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

I think the Bezo’s Ex is doing that, but she didn’t (directly) choose to be a billionaire.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Once you get into a position like that, you're basically just surrounded by yes-men who tell you how great you are non-stop. It would take a very strong character to not go bonkers in that kind of situation. Add to that the fact that people who become billionaires will be pretty self obsessed to begin with and you have a recipe for disaster. Actually, the crusty old French philosophers had this shit figured out 250 years ago.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 hours ago

CEOs, most billionaires, they're psychopaths. That's why they're good at the job. Now we have a bunch of psychopaths controlling all the wealth in the world. If you look through history, they've always been the enemy.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

True, but I feel like they are all missing out on the opportunity for some long term ego stroking. Just look at half the early skyscrapers built in the early 20th century; the Chrysler building for example is named after the man, not the company. Do it right and people could be praising the Brin Rail System for decades to come, and he'd be remembered forever for that. Instead he's just one more tech-douche, and that's all he'll ever be remembered as.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah but the people who built these skyscrapers during the gilded age weren't exactly paragons of virtue.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 2 points 7 hours ago

Doing something good for bad reasons is still doing something good.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 hours ago

Not saying they were. Just saying that the self aggrandizement of assholes can result in cool shit for the rest of us. Instead we get boring assholes who just sit there jerking off to a number going up.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

Yeah, there are studies about this. Once people get a certain amount is power, empathy starts to break down and they can't see other people's perspective anymore. That means they also don't care about others anymore.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 10 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I say we grant them their dream of a world without poor people, by segregating them permanently away from non-billionaires, and let them trade their worthless currency amongst each-other.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 hours ago

How long before they started raiding blue state cities because they can't survive without federal subsidies

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, how else do you solve this without gulags? IMO capitalist realism can't be undone by simply consuming the rich. It would require deprogramming.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Not gulags, exactly, but reeducation is absolutely necessary

I just don't know how you do it when roughly a third of your country needs deprogramming from their cult.

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago

Sergey: "If you ever need to know the answer to if you should do something or not at my company then follow the instructions on the wall!"

Don't be evil

Sergey: "Oh! They got this all screwed up"

Don't! be evil

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 25 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Why is he wearing an airport carpet?

[–] Fermion@mander.xyz 8 points 11 hours ago

I thought that was a bowling alley carpet.

Does he have any young kids who have recently gotten into bedazzling?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 11 points 12 hours ago

His casino carpet is at the cleaners.

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Don't tax them kill them kill their renfields kill their vile spawn burn everything they took from us and salt the earth they have defiled with their foot steps it would make me feel cute

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

I mean yes but also if we are already killing them don’t salt the land. Take it and grow sustainable crops instead.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -3 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

bernie sanders would rather keep using X than losing followers

[–] ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Someone has to keep shouting in the Nazi echo chamber. Might not do much good, but at least he's trying.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz -2 points 5 hours ago

Why is he not on the fediverse? It takes 2 minutes to create an account on mastodon, i would argue he's part of the nazi echo chamber.

[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

Yes that's the issue.

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Despite alternatives, Twitter still has a lot of reach. Even if it's just shouting at a wall at times.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 5 hours ago

Why not extending the reach even further by creating a mastodon account?

[–] slemptastrophe@piefed.social 1 points 12 hours ago