I don't want children because in my 30 years on this planet I have watched helplessly as the foundations for fundamentally supporting life on Earth have been dismantled in the name of profit.
this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
69 points (98.6% liked)
Australia
4995 readers
332 users here now
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
Before you post:
If you're posting anything related to:
- The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
- Politics, post it to Australian Politics
- World News/Events, post it to World News
- A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
- When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment
Banner Photo
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Australian Politics
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
- Aussie Memes
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
Moderation
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Pretty much. On our current trajectory, the quality of life for future generations will be significantly reduced and will only continue to worsen. It has never made sense to me to bring children into such a world.
Oh yeah cant you wait a few years for the housing market to go back to down?
Its been 6 years since covid when will it go back? Women cant have kids like men. There is an upper age limit eventually. Its like being punished for being responsible. Really makes me want to :: blocked by lemmy ::
It's men, too. Sperm count and more importantly quality deteriorates. So both sexes are on the biological clock.
I dk if i can see it as comparable. The lower chance for men is still way better than 0 chance for women. I know a few blokes who had kids in 60s but 0 women in that age would be able to naturally.
You made me curious because I know of some outlier cases where post-menopausal women have had natural pregnancies.
On 20 August 1997, Dawn Brooke (UK) became the oldest natural mother when she gave birth to a son by Caesarian section at the age of 59 years. She conceived accidentally, having managed to ovulate past her last period.
https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/oldest-mother-to-conceive-naturally-
Never heard of post-menopause pregnancy. Feels like body said we not done yet lol.
Not quite the same thing, but my mom had my older siblings when she was between 15 and 21 years old. The delivery she had at 21 was complicated and traumatic. Doctors told her she'd never be able to have another child. 17 years later, she goes to the doctor and they find me in her belly. Life damn sure finds a way.
Damn, you were one determined little blastocyst. Well done.
Not comparable in any way. 80 year old men can get women pregnant. Women generally have extreme trouble getting pregnant at half that age.
In any way? That's a gross exaggeration & oversimplifies the myriad of reasons Women have difficulty becoming pregnant. My point was simply that everyone is on the clock.
Men and women’s biological clock for the ability to get someone pregnant or become pregnant are massively different, like I said. A perfect health man will be able to impregnate women decades after a perfect health woman of the same age can get pregnant. That’s just biological reality.
"Can't afford" is a loaded phrase. I think it depends on one's life gaols. IE A high standard of living or a lower standard of living, but high quality of life.
I just looked it up. In Australia it costs between $300,000 to $450,00 to rear a child to age 18. The assumption is that a couple will both work, producing an AFTER TAX income of about $130,000 PA.
We have been conned. Somewhere along the line we came to believe that a high standard of living equals a high quality of life. Good little consumers buy lots of "stuff"
BUT yes, there is certainly a housing bubble in Australia, making our houses among the most expensive in the world. Today, the median house price in Adelaide is between 900-$1 million.==== I live in a so-called dormitory suburb. Today my modest, 120 square metre house has a council valuation of $700,000.
Today, cheap houses can still be bought. That's fine, as long as you don't mind living from 150 km [and more] from the City.
I have no answers. I'm 78 years old. I can't tell if things are distorted through the lens of advanced age, or things really are as bad as they seem for young adults just starting out in life.
Things really are that bad. Try finding a job 150km from the city.
This is a sad situation for Australia on many accounts. It would help if more employment was made available in regional areas where there is still space and prices for housing are relatively affordable.
This is not just Australia. This is repeated across every single developed economy. The problem is capitalism. This is the expected result when every aspect of life is aggressively commoditised. When our political class collude with corporations to extract value from the people, rather than improve their quality of life and standard of living.
I don't entirely agree with this sentiment, personally. Regional areas by definition do not have large populations. There is be work to be done in the regions, and regional employment can and should be increased, but building more infrastructure to accommodate more people would be very expensive per person.
The real solution in my mind is more homes closer to existing services.
We are pretty allergic to densification in Australia, but we desperately need it. Seems to work fantastically for many European cities.
The car has lead to ridiculous urban sprawl in all major Australian cities, and we need to densify so public transport becomes more affordable to expand.
That and ending housing being an investment vehicle.
I agree with what you say but still maintain that regional areas can and should be developed intelligently. Having enormous built-up cities can be seen as a positive but also has major downsides in the case of war, major facility breakdown, or stoppage of supply (as could happen if transport breaks down due to lack of fuel). That would be a lot of people close together in a state of crisis. We can only hope that doesn't come to pass.
Yeah fair enough, you make good points. I only resist calls that we should de-urbanise. Though re-reading your comments, you weren't saying that
It's now a seemingly common trend in developed nations. Old people voted against social programs nationally and vetoed housing development locally then wonder why the children they voted out of existence aren't around.
Capitalism prefers to outsource the child rearing to developing nations.
It welcomes immigration for young adults who are ready to be wage slave / tax payers.
Wow. "
I can see clearly now the rain has gone" 🎶
Im 61, i decided another I nor the planet could afford kids 40 years aho and had a vasectomy.
over those 40 years endless articles about people not producing more grist for the mill
A nice goal would be a planet with 100 million at most
Well the last time the global population was around 100 million was over 2000 years ago, so I think that asking for a 99% reduction in human life is screaming eco-fascist
Another person I knew didn't want to have children because of the environmental impact. My theory is if all environmentally conscious people stop having children... Who is left to instill those values in the younger generation.
Your theory hinges on the premise that the only adults children can learn anything from are their biological parents, which is completely false.
No, it hinges on the fact that early life development is pivitol in developing children's morals/values, sense of community etc.
A planet with 100 million at fucking most? Are you stupid or something?
You'll need to outline your objections more clearly.
If you don’t want kids, and you have a vasectomy, that would mean you’re fucking smart.
We're not worried.
Yeah I'd put it down as realistic assessment