this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
69 points (98.6% liked)

Australia

4995 readers
297 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] arbilp3@aussie.zone 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This is a sad situation for Australia on many accounts. It would help if more employment was made available in regional areas where there is still space and prices for housing are relatively affordable.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

This is not just Australia. This is repeated across every single developed economy. The problem is capitalism. This is the expected result when every aspect of life is aggressively commoditised. When our political class collude with corporations to extract value from the people, rather than improve their quality of life and standard of living.

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't entirely agree with this sentiment, personally. Regional areas by definition do not have large populations. There is be work to be done in the regions, and regional employment can and should be increased, but building more infrastructure to accommodate more people would be very expensive per person.

The real solution in my mind is more homes closer to existing services.

We are pretty allergic to densification in Australia, but we desperately need it. Seems to work fantastically for many European cities.

The car has lead to ridiculous urban sprawl in all major Australian cities, and we need to densify so public transport becomes more affordable to expand.

That and ending housing being an investment vehicle.

[–] arbilp3@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I agree with what you say but still maintain that regional areas can and should be developed intelligently. Having enormous built-up cities can be seen as a positive but also has major downsides in the case of war, major facility breakdown, or stoppage of supply (as could happen if transport breaks down due to lack of fuel). That would be a lot of people close together in a state of crisis. We can only hope that doesn't come to pass.

[–] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah fair enough, you make good points. I only resist calls that we should de-urbanise. Though re-reading your comments, you weren't saying that