this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
771 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

20074 readers
3167 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 6 points 45 minutes ago (1 children)

Isn't some energy still dissipated as light instead of heat?

[–] Noved@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 minutes ago

Which travels to a location, hits it and is eventually converted to heat.

[–] cass27@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Noise would be a small but non-zero form of heat loss that shouldn't contribute to temperature increase

[–] dz2@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 hours ago

Noise would turn in to heat as it’s absorbed, so it’s just heat with extra steps. Same deal with lights

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (6 children)

Perhaps this is a dumb question, but perhaps it is not:

If you just had, in say a studio apartment, or a single bedroom, basically just a large container of water, where the container is made of something fairly to considerably thermally conductive...

Would or could this act as something like a thermal regulator for the room, to a potentially useful degree, such that it could ease the overall power usage of an AC/Heating system?

The water doesn't do anything, in like a designed machine sense; its not part of plumbing or heating, its just a big ole tank of water, sitting there.

The idea I am going with is something like how large static bodies of water act as regulators for nearby climate zones, through a day night cycle ... they tend to keep temperatures in the surrounding area a bit more stable, though of course humidity and the water cycle have other effects in a more open weather system.

I also realize there are a lot of potentially confusing or confounding variables at play here.

But my thinking is that maybe, at some scale, in some conditions, this could basically normalize your day-night temperature cycle, at least somewhat.

Obviously in real world, just a simple tank of water would potentially freeze in winter, or boil in summer, in more extreme environments, that you'd at bare minimum have to have some mechanical system to prevent problems... but uh, ... yeah.

[–] Pipster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

You see this with normal heating systems. My house has hot air heating with a big burner and vents in the rooms. It is great for instant heat but once it turns off you lose the heat just as fast. And if you dont have a vent in the room it can be pretty cold.

But the house I grew up in had water filled radiators in every room. Took ages to warm up the house but it would transfer an awful lot of heat into the brick walls so it would stay warm for a really long time after the heating shut off.

So in the old house in winter you really didnt notice the heating turning on and off but in my new one it is painfully obvious. I really want to rip it out and get a better system.

[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, this is called thermal mass, or more scientificly, heat retention. The more stuff you in have a space, the more resilient to change it'll temperature it is. Insulation, is basically putting a bunch of high retention materials in perimeter of a building so that it stays more consistent

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Hrm.

What about:

Radiant Barrier.

https://www.greenenergyofsanantonio.com/post/the-evolution-of-radiant-barrier-insulation-from-nasa-to-home-efficiency

Basically, as I understand it, this stuff is extremely good at reflecting heat... not... absorbing and containing it. And it is relatively stupidly cheap, for how effective it is.

Like, its so effective that the industry that makes traditional US home insulation batting... basically did everything they could to make it so as few people know this stuff exists as possible.

[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 2 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

Radiant barrier is a different insulation mechanism and is also good. The nice thing about radiant barrier is it requires very little material to do its thing. The best solution is a combination of the 2, but most insulation is still opperating by thermal mass.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 minutes ago

That is in line with my understanding as well.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I don’t think it’s a dumb question at all. I’m not a physics person but I think what you’re describing is a thermal battery. It’s the reason people put tiles in their ovens for smoothing out hot and cold spots and moderating temperature swings from the oven cutting on and off or opening the door.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like adobe sorta.

Lots of places in the desert with big walls.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Large brick/stone fireplace+chimneys do similar in colder climates, holds heat in the winter and stays cooler in the summer.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Oh, I hadn't even thought of that. I always thought stoves were just way more efficient, but a giant old school hearth-thing actually makes a lot more sense now.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Useful? No, mainly because you need circulation of the air to feel it.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I didn't downvote you, but:

Ok, then... have a ceiling fan above it?

A very slow one, that uses little energy?

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 57 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago) (1 children)

Secondary thought! What if you attached a bunch of processor heat sink type fins to the mass? Might not be good for long term regulation, but it would smooth out temperature curves daily.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 minutes ago

Yes but then the downside is you have a giant porcupine that will draw blood, in the middle of the room, lol.

You could buff that out a bit though?

...?

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago

No need to apologize for someone else. But I appreciate the thought.

And you are absolutely right. A ceiling fan, plus a thermal mass would work.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago

Electronics teachers generally clarify "other than resistive heaters"

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 61 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Every electric device is a heater. Some just do other things too.

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Indeed we’ve plugged in a bitcoin miner to our central heating and now heating is “free”. I’m not sure how profitable it is when you’re not using the heat though.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 8 hours ago (4 children)

A brushless motor only converts ~5% of its input to heat. That's low enough that you can reasonably call it a side effect.

Now, a computer, that's a heater that happens to produce math as a side effect. 100% of its input ends up as heat.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

math as a side effect

That's a funny way of spelling porn

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago

Fun fact! Your porn machine can also be used to shitpost.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

It all becomes heat eventually in the end though. Sometimes it's just a multi step complex process outside the physical bounds of the heater.

Wait a sec, is the universe just God's space heater?

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 hours ago

Depends on the god.

[–] potpotato@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

In god’s universe it is winter and that’s why the earth is heating up. It says so right in Ecclesiasties. Boom, toasted climate change nerds.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 hours ago

It might output the results of a computation once in a while though

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Aren't computers damn near 100 percent efficient heaters?

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No, they're damn near as power-efficient as electric space heaters though if I'm not mistaken, but these are not 100% efficient.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago

Forgive me for being argumentative, not my intention to be combative but now that I'm thinking more about it, isn't everything a 100% efficient heater? Like sound hits an object, and is turned into heat. Light hits an object and is turned into heat. Electricity travels down a wire and is turned into heat(usually).

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

A heat pump will drop to 100% efficiency in cold enough weather.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Can heat pumps drop below 100%?

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They can drop all the way to 0 if the temperature difference is high enough. You can't heat your house with a heat pump if it's 0K outside.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Heat pumps generally come with an electrical resistive backup in case it's too cold outside, so even at arbitrarily low temperatures a heat pump can only drop to 100%

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

At that point, the heat pump is off and you're using a resistive heater. You can't just glue an LED to an incandescent lightbulb and call it a 50% efficient incandescent lightbulb.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 minutes ago

True. You know, the moment I left that comment, I thought that was pedantic, I shouldn't have said it, but by that point if I had deleted it it would just sit there saying deleted forever and that would bother me even more

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Software engineers fixing a prod-down bug on Friday afternoons operate at 100%

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 5 hours ago

Any resistance heater, but the most efficient ≠ the most cost effective.

load more comments
view more: next ›