this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
355 points (99.2% liked)

World News

55775 readers
1542 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sobchak@programming.dev 3 points 40 minutes ago

It also can't do any job I know of. Weird framing. Though, I guess that's the snake oil they're trying to sell.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 24 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm just going to note how giga-fucked it is that AI is openly being criticized because it hasn't led to more layoffs.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 4 points 55 minutes ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago)

Just want to point out the "more layoffs". We are still in the Uber-subsidized part of the relationship.

This is the honeymoon and it ain't off to a great start

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Slop software houses are gonna PAY BIG for losing human talent.

[–] Mvlad88@lemmy.world 53 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Just imagine where we would be 5-10-15 years from now, if all that AI money would have went into social and environmental projects.

[–] freshcow@lemmy.world 4 points 55 minutes ago

That describes my entire life since adolescence... wondering what kind of society we could have had if we werent governed by sociopaths

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 24 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

I'm hoping this insane future booked shortage causes the consumer electronics industry to crash due to lack of parts which in turn should cause the AI industry to crash when no one is buying new tech nor fat AI subscriptions.

It already has to be affecting small to medium businesses significantly when even laptop procurement has tripled in price and you're spending a ton of money for enterprise AI access.

[–] Comet79@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

These companies want to own all the hardware so you are forced to rent a computer. To buy a PC that does nothing by itself and requires some remote hardware to function. Amazon is already preparing a "game streaming" service, for example.

[–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Good luck with that to them. Internet reliability is extremely crappy in the US, even on supposedly "tech hubs" in California the best you can do is unreliable Comcast or super slow DSL from AT&T.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Ahh, late to market in a flooded field with at least one law of physics preventing it from ever working acceptably. Good job, Jeff!

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 17 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I think they’re hoping the result is that we can only afford cheap tablet devices that act as dumb terminals for their cloud services which we have to rent forever due to holding our data hostage so they can manufacture consent and prevent us from developing open solutions to their walled garden proprietary products.

A precarious moment at the edge of a cliff.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

It already has to be affecting small to medium businesses significantly...

I'd imagine that is a major factor in why it's so accepted right now. Gotta consolidate the market!

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Wow!

Really?!

No way!!!

Its almost like anyone who could do grade school math could have pointed that out 2, 3, 4 years ago!

I wonder if anyone did...

Anyway, uh, chain all these fucking morons into each other, SAW style, tell em they all have to work together and mutually suffer to escape the trap.

That's not murder, it's comedy.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Not too mention Über and other new services clearly worked on getting people hooked, then jacking up the price.

SAW style

So, their arms are stuck in a device that allows them to reach a keyboard. If they can get the AI to do a task correctly they're free, if not the device cuts of the arms.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

So, their arms are stuck in a device that allows them to reach a keyboard. If they can get the AI to do a task correctly they're free, if not the device cuts of the arms.

Hah! That's very good as well, I was thinking something like... they all have a chain going literally through their shoulders, around/between bones, with lock mechanism inside their bodies.

They each have a key, but the way the... dungeon/trap is set up, they can only unlock the chain if they all simultaneously turn the right key, in the right lock, for the right person, all at the same time.

If any one of them dies of blood loss, well, now they'll all die.

If they break their collarbones, to pull the chain/lock out... I mean good luck trying, without severing your suprascapular artery.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 43 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

So... why the fuck are you going all-in on AI at the expense of literally everyone and everything else!?

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 19 points 8 hours ago

Short term? Drive wages down with the threat of firing people and replacing them with AI. Long term? They're either delusional enough to believe AI will improve to the point where it actually is cheaper, or else they're willing to pay more for a workforce that can't organize and protest and that they don't have to worry about doing things like being a whistleblower for their latest amoral plan.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 11 points 7 hours ago

Some CEO's thought they could save a bundle and were eager to replace workers. Other CEO's saw that, had to do a bunch of layoffs and knew saying "replaced with AI" instead of layoffs keeps stock prices high. Then you have a whole bunch of CEO's that thought the other guys must be on to something, think they're missing out and jump into AI both feet first. The laggards are bombarded with news and propaganda by the big players to get them pulled in too. So by now you get everybody messing around with AI in some fashion. That's the moment the tech giants put the squeeze on everybody.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

They are clearly anti-human. The question is what are they really trying to achieve? I hope it is not just Bioshock.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

My theory is that they think that, with world-scale financing, testing, and iterating, they can get this thing to do a lot of work that is currently exclusively in the purview of humans today. I believe that some of the wealthiest among us tolerate the rest of us sharing their air because, for now, they must, and the second they can replace us with obedient machines, they will.

If I am right about that, then this entire hype cycle and seemingly endless funding rounds and unabated lending Ouroboros Ponzi schemes makes more sense. They're not delusional that the product works better than it does, they are desperate for the holy grail of greed: not having to ever share anything with anyone ever again.

[–] edwardbear@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

profit. the profit must flow.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

...but there is no profit...eg testla

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 71 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (6 children)

Just wait till executives realize they can't use AI as a scapegoat when they force a bad decision through the company. They'll have no one to take the fall.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago

It's like that twilight zone episode. They fire everyone then no one is left to help do anything

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's why there's often a human in the loop who has to check the result of the AI and can be blamed if things go wrong. The poor sap can't possibly check and correct the volumes of slop produced so they're just there to work as a scapegoat.

[–] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 2 points 5 hours ago

This reminds me of Barney Stinson

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 34 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

AI businesses are already getting away with their software killing innocent people. I think everyone will work out for the people at the top.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

Yup. Capitalism only works in a finite world if there's a catastrophic economic hardship for 99% of the population every 5 to 10 years just to ensure the working class doesn't achieve too many gains. Ai causing the economy to crash is bonus feature, not a bug.

[–] Codpiece@feddit.uk 12 points 10 hours ago

I’m pretty certain that companies and people have been using the old “computer error” excuse since at least the 1980s.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 10 points 11 hours ago

Are you sure? So far it seems like they've been able to do just that.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Gruen tonight was talking about 'Single Person Billion Dollar Brands', it was sickening.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

At its current pace, AI expenditures may reach $5.2 trillion by 2030

I can't wait.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

They think it is a lottery and sinking more money into it will increase the odds of "winning at everything".

[–] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 4 points 5 hours ago

I love that their moat has been bridged by open models as soon as it was dug. At the current rate, you just have to wait six or nine months and open models will be at opus 4.6 level which is really all you need for most applications. After this I don't see how the big labs could ever recoup their losses.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

May this be the beginning of the end, or at least the end of the beginning. Quite possibly with a bubble burst so we can move on from the era of slop (am I being too optimistic?)

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not sure slop will go for good, I'm just hoping for a flood of cheap RAM, SSDs and GPUs at "please take us back" prices to build a new machine from scratch

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 hours ago

I’ve been shouting this everywhere but I’m pretty sure their plan is to make it so you can never do that, and you have to subscribe to Fire tablet or whatever to participate in society

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 23 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Obviously, but think of all the middle management, payroll, HR, etc you can fire/not hire!

I'm not sure who to root for here. Middle Managers can suck eggs.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 18 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Their not firing middle managers. Their firing front line coders and lower desk employees and keeping the middle managers while using AI.

[–] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 2 points 5 hours ago

That's not really what's happening they've been trimming a lot of middle manager fat too

[–] tyler@programming.dev 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 4 points 8 hours ago
[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 6 points 10 hours ago

So unshocking.