this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
471 points (99.4% liked)

World News

55775 readers
2026 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Janx@piefed.social 60 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

So... why the fuck are you going all-in on AI at the expense of literally everyone and everything else!?

[–] Butterphinger@lemmy.zip 1 points 39 minutes ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago)

Control, propaganda, surveillance, tools of war, etc and so forth.

the investors, anyway

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 25 points 14 hours ago

Short term? Drive wages down with the threat of firing people and replacing them with AI. Long term? They're either delusional enough to believe AI will improve to the point where it actually is cheaper, or else they're willing to pay more for a workforce that can't organize and protest and that they don't have to worry about doing things like being a whistleblower for their latest amoral plan.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 16 points 13 hours ago

Some CEO's thought they could save a bundle and were eager to replace workers. Other CEO's saw that, had to do a bunch of layoffs and knew saying "replaced with AI" instead of layoffs keeps stock prices high. Then you have a whole bunch of CEO's that thought the other guys must be on to something, think they're missing out and jump into AI both feet first. The laggards are bombarded with news and propaganda by the big players to get them pulled in too. So by now you get everybody messing around with AI in some fashion. That's the moment the tech giants put the squeeze on everybody.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 11 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

They are clearly anti-human. The question is what are they really trying to achieve? I hope it is not just Bioshock.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

My theory is that they think that, with world-scale financing, testing, and iterating, they can get this thing to do a lot of work that is currently exclusively in the purview of humans today. I believe that some of the wealthiest among us tolerate the rest of us sharing their air because, for now, they must, and the second they can replace us with obedient machines, they will.

If I am right about that, then this entire hype cycle and seemingly endless funding rounds and unabated lending Ouroboros Ponzi schemes makes more sense. They're not delusional that the product works better than it does, they are desperate for the holy grail of greed: not having to ever share anything with anyone ever again.

[–] edwardbear@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

profit. the profit must flow.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 12 hours ago

...but there is no profit...eg testla