this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
566 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

84103 readers
2954 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 hours ago

If we are going to eschew open source projects from shitty tech companies, then there’s a pretty long list.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 71 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

"Quietly™" by posting about it beforehand everywhere they could.

[–] MortUS@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 hour ago

Much fox,
very lion.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 72 points 13 hours ago (9 children)

Cool.

Still sticking with uBlock and SponsorBlock (skips all the "this video was sponsored by" segments on YouTube).

[–] Echolynx@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I wish SponsorBlock and DeArrow were integrated into Invidious, like with Piped.

[–] Purebred0880@lemmy.wtf 1 points 27 minutes ago

Freetube has integrated sponsor block (might have to enable it in the settings first). I've generally been very happy with the Freetube flatpak, although there have been times when YouTube actively fought against third parties where Freetube did not work for a month.

[–] laz@pawb.social 26 points 11 hours ago

Add DeArrow in there as well (anti-clickbait)

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 18 points 11 hours ago

a default-disabled prototype

No wonder it didn't show up in normal/enduser release notes.

This article suggests you have to disabled Enhanced Tracking Protection to test it. Does it replace that entire system with an equivalent system?

I'll wait until it's stable and productive.

[–] miridius@lemmy.world 25 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

That's cool, take the good part of Brave, leave behind the villainous CEO and dodgy crypto scams

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

I used brave for a while. Recently switched to zen browser to try some better tab management. But despite all braves issues, it’s ad/tracker blocking was always very good imo. I think it will be a good addition to Firefox.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] polle@feddit.org 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Why did they not just set ublock as a default installed plugin?

[–] loics2@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Because the performance of brave lib is a little better since it doesn't go through the plugin API

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So should you use this now? Or keep uBlock origin? Or enable both for maximum protection?

[–] desertdruid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

it's up to you which one you wanna use, I'll keep using uBlock origin (both is overkill, you only need one for blocking ads)

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I guess my question is more, is the “brave” one as good as uBlock? Or does it miss some things? Sounds like performance is better.

My only thought about using both would be if the “brave” version is more performant, but less protective, it could quickly get rid of most of the ads, and let uBlock get the rest, reducing how many are filtered at greater performance cost. But I’m sure that’s based on a gross misunderstanding of how it all works.

[–] polle@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Is it? Like YouTube is less laggy with that? Thats the only situation where i see actual delays by adblocking

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 4 hours ago

I use brave as my YouTube browser and it does seem to perform better than Firefox with unlock. There's frequently weird delays with Firefox where the ads get through a little and are then blocked(admittedly I probably only update it like once a month). I don't get that with Brave.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Yes, it is. No, the delays on Youtube don't come from the performance of the adblocking code, so you won't notice many differences. But more efficient adblocking is good for everyone - noticeably more so on devices with batteries, but still helpful for everyone.

[–] bunnydog@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

How incredible i think I’ll start using Firefox again as it’s becoming better i just wish they would create their own email service already.

[–] kalistia@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 5 points 10 hours ago

Where it stores all the data? USA? Or some Big Tech cloud?

load more comments
view more: next ›