this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
131 points (77.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39220 readers
1085 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s a movie starring his nephew in the lead role, approved by his estate, and by all accounts it just feels like an attempt to whitewash him. This is a man who was accused of being a serial child molester, settled with a family out of court for $25 million just to avoid a trial (Chandler), and openly admitted he slept in the same bed as kids while he was an adult (Bashir interview), among other things. I don’t really see what there is to debate.

Anything pointing this out gets backlash on movie-related subreddits, which I find wild. It makes me wonder, if Epstein could sing and dance, would he have gotten a biopic too? Would people be defending him like this?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

To be clear, I am, and have always been a punk rocker/metal head, do I couldn't give a rats ass about the king of pop.

But he always struck me as very much on the spectrum, of course not when I was growing up, since it wasn't a thing back then, but I find it very unlikely he did the things he was accused of.

I could be wrong, but it felt like a cash grab by the parents.

[–] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

I've never been a fan of Michael Jackson and have no intentions of seeing the movie but I do know a die-hard Michael Jackson fan who went to see the movie and he said the movie was pretty awful.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Personally I find all celebrity biopics disgusting.

I mean, it would be different if these things tended to actually be honest deeply researched analyses done by hard-nosed experts (which would probably mean they would be spectacularly boring as movies and better as articles or books) and if celebrity status was highly correlated to the greatness of one's achievements for society rather than to being well known because of practicing a very public profession (so, featuring more of, for example, Great Scientists and fewer Star Musicians and Movie Stars), but in the current society, celebrity biopics are fantasy spectacles about people whose fame is due to nothing else than being a competent professional in showbiz.

That in itself doesn't make the biopics "disgusting" but the recent abundance of them does add up to too much to of an overly sweet low-nutrition thing the point of being stomach turning, IMHO.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

i like biopics that don't pretend to be anything more than entertainment, like Weird Al and Nick Cages biopic movies

[–] arararagi@ani.social 3 points 4 hours ago
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

I did wonder if it was going to talk about his abusive father or the molesting thing. But not enough for me to watch it and find out.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 29 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

My son is a big cinephile, and we watch a LOT of movies, but I am also a history guy, so my son knows that I really don't like biopics, or films that portray some historical event. Invariably, Hollywood decisions outweigh historical accuracy, and the result is usually impossible for me to tolerate. I would rather see a boring portrayal of the actual events, than an exciting rewrite.

MJ and I are the exact same age, and I grew up LOVING his music. The allegations were shocking, and I studied every interview and watched every documentary and news coverage of it that I could. Today, I can't really say I trust either side. I see problems with the accusers, I see problems with the accused. Lawyers advise their clients to settle all the time - "It's not personal, it's just business." I've been on the receiving end of that "advice," and it's hard to hear, because you know people will always see it as an admission of guilt, and not "just business."

So while I abandoned Bill Cosby (another heartbreaker I grew up with) I've decided to keep listening to MJ. We will never know the entire story, but I know enough that the accusations have a LOT of problems, and I'm not willing to throw MJ aside for that.

So while I am still a big (but conflicted) fan, I probably won't watch the film, and if I do, I won't be taking it seriously.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I saw a thread recently that seemed to indicate the Epstien files exhonorated Michael. Apparently it may have been a smear campaign against someone on the spectrum that wouldn't work with them. He was notoriously picky about who he would work with.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 1 points 55 minutes ago

Epstien files exhonorated Michael. Apparently it may have been a smear campaign against someone on the spectrum that wouldn't work with them.

I haven’t looked further into it myself, but I also heard much the same.

Props to him if this is anywhere close to being real. He was one hell of a damaged person carrying a shitton of psychological scars, but it sounds like he really did care about the kids.

And he was one hell of a good singer. I’ve got most of his albums on vinyl and MP3.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 17 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This is the one sex allegation I just don't believe.

And its a biopic so... It wouldn't matter who it was about. Shit... I'd watch a biopic about Epstein. I'd still hate the fucker at the end.

[–] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yeah Michael Jackson was a breed of his own. He apparently had little boys SLEEPING in his bed, which is weird and absolutely unacceptable especially in today's climate, but he did not touch them. McCauley Culkin said "We were just SLEEPING." Still completely inappropriate but that family who got $25 million out of Michael, they were just milking a cash cow.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

We will never have the truth in our entire lives. But! I kind of see how MJ could actually not be a pedo, but just a special flavor of weirdo.

Imagine that you are born into a family of 8 (2 came shortly after) that live in 2 bedroom home. Paretns are working class and an oppressed minority, so are you. At age 5 parents put you in a family band where they forced you to play and punished for mistakes made during rehearsals and performances. Time goes by. Your band becomes a sensation. You are the front man. You grow out of it and go solo. You are consistently the most famous artist. All eyes on you. Everyone knows each and every step you make, in tiny details.

All that while your childhood was spent never having own corner, never having time to play with other children. You are constantly performing everywhere. Your life is not like "the other kids".

Now you are famous as hell with a millions to your name. You can do pretty much anything. And you, of course, might get that feeling of wasted time that you probably can catch up with. You attempt to create a real Neverland, spend tons of time with children, try to make their lives magical and wonderful. You do things for childer that you've dreamed you'd like to have when you were a child yourself. BUT you are at the age of 30 and every one assumes that you diddle children. Which, again, might be true. We cant possibly deny false accusations in favor of getting rich by settlements. And that baby over the balcony didnt help either.

I, honestly, feel bad for him. Great musician, vocals are top notch and unmatched. Dancing moves out of this world. Great showmanship. Terrible personal life full of abuse, discrimination, specualtions, accusations, failed childhood. Poor guy. He was fucked up in head. Maybe not in pedofilic way. But he was certainly not fine. All that life experience plus super likely drug abuse since we are talking about show biz.

Just tacking on to your comment... The Jackson's were aggressively exploited by most of the key adults in their lives from a relatively young age. Michael was like 10 when the Jackson 5 had their first big hit single. Joe Jackson and Berry Gordy recognized they had a "cash cow" on their hands and resolved to squeeze it for every penny they could.

Dealing with a relentless work schedule where you're harshly punished for your mistakes and then having your life shoved under a microscope for the entire world to see would break a lot of adults. It's no wonder Michael went off the rails.

[–] razzazzika@lemmy.zip 20 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

https://www.ladbible.com/entertainment/celebrity/macaulay-culkin-michael-jackson-relationship-explained-503771-20250319

From hearing Macaulay Vulking tell it, it sounds exactly like that. Like Jackson was stuck as a child and just wanted childhood friends and sleepovers. Weird, sure but nothing sexual. He has other accusers, but I really dont know if that was just people being creeped out by his weirdness or not and misinterpreting things.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We will never know. But coming to the fact that after death not so much surfaced, I am pretty sure poor guy was just unstable mentally and not a pedo like Epstein.

His life is something few if any of us could bare. No flashy movie will be able to show it in full picture.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

But coming to the fact that after death not so much surfaced

Grow up. His estate spent millions in hush money and NDAs. He may have died, but he's still a money maker.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›