this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
113 points (78.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39220 readers
1081 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s a movie starring his nephew in the lead role, approved by his estate, and by all accounts it just feels like an attempt to whitewash him. This is a man who was accused of being a serial child molester, settled with a family out of court for $25 million just to avoid a trial (Chandler), and openly admitted he slept in the same bed as kids while he was an adult (Bashir interview), among other things. I don’t really see what there is to debate.

Anything pointing this out gets backlash on movie-related subreddits, which I find wild. It makes me wonder, if Epstein could sing and dance, would he have gotten a biopic too? Would people be defending him like this?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

We will never have the truth in our entire lives. But! I kind of see how MJ could actually not be a pedo, but just a special flavor of weirdo.

Imagine that you are born into a family of 8 (2 came shortly after) that live in 2 bedroom home. Paretns are working class and an oppressed minority, so are you. At age 5 parents put you in a family band where they forced you to play and punished for mistakes made during rehearsals and performances. Time goes by. Your band becomes a sensation. You are the front man. You grow out of it and go solo. You are consistently the most famous artist. All eyes on you. Everyone knows each and every step you make, in tiny details.

All that while your childhood was spent never having own corner, never having time to play with other children. You are constantly performing everywhere. Your life is not like "the other kids".

Now you are famous as hell with a millions to your name. You can do pretty much anything. And you, of course, might get that feeling of wasted time that you probably can catch up with. You attempt to create a real Neverland, spend tons of time with children, try to make their lives magical and wonderful. You do things for childer that you've dreamed you'd like to have when you were a child yourself. BUT you are at the age of 30 and every one assumes that you diddle children. Which, again, might be true. We cant possibly deny false accusations in favor of getting rich by settlements. And that baby over the balcony didnt help either.

I, honestly, feel bad for him. Great musician, vocals are top notch and unmatched. Dancing moves out of this world. Great showmanship. Terrible personal life full of abuse, discrimination, specualtions, accusations, failed childhood. Poor guy. He was fucked up in head. Maybe not in pedofilic way. But he was certainly not fine. All that life experience plus super likely drug abuse since we are talking about show biz.

[–] razzazzika@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

https://www.ladbible.com/entertainment/celebrity/macaulay-culkin-michael-jackson-relationship-explained-503771-20250319

From hearing Macaulay Vulking tell it, it sounds exactly like that. Like Jackson was stuck as a child and just wanted childhood friends and sleepovers. Weird, sure but nothing sexual. He has other accusers, but I really dont know if that was just people being creeped out by his weirdness or not and misinterpreting things.

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

We will never know. But coming to the fact that after death not so much surfaced, I am pretty sure poor guy was just unstable mentally and not a pedo like Epstein.

His life is something few if any of us could bare. No flashy movie will be able to show it in full picture.

[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

At the very least they could have made a better movie that acknowledged the abuse and how screwed up he became because of it. Would be a far better story too, the movie is essentially just an extended highlights reel

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

I agree. Movie is plain cash grab made up out of highlights of MJs life. Nothing "true" is in this movie besides already widely known facts.

It is just weird to me that OP lines up MJ with someone like Epstein. I just feel that these are two different types of creep that cant be really compared.

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 hours ago

No. Biopics always are a watered down version of their real life. Ita basicly a "best hits of"

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 6 points 5 hours ago

Those last two questions could easily be under a Chris Brown post. And he's still touring.

[–] Teh@sh.itjust.works 25 points 9 hours ago (12 children)

I have a friend who worked for, and alongside MJ (they’re credited on at least one album). They became a personal friend and have a ton of amazing stories and insane memorabilia. On the day Michael died, his phone rang and rang with a LOT of people wishing him condolences.

They tell me that MJ never really got a childhood, and in some ways lived his childhood through other children. My friend spent a couple nights at his Neverland ranch with his own kids and tells me that he trusted MJ and doesnt believe for a minute that he was actually guilty of anything untoward, and that things like “sleepovers” really did happen but were really from a place of innocence and MJ just wanting to have that childlike experience that he didn’t get.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] randomdeadguy@lemmy.world 25 points 12 hours ago

"too woke" was invented by big sleep to sell more Zzzz...

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not seeing this movie because I'm not sure whether he was a child molester or not. There are rumours now that he actually protected kids from Epstein but I can't decide what to believe.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 8 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I do believe he molested children, although I think the reason we have trouble accepting it is that I think there are a bunch of types of molestation, and we as a culture have a poor understanding of what these are, and so we struggle to recognize them.

Epstein, for instance, sought the youngest possible post-pubescent girls in order to get off on taking their innocence.

Jackson, imo, sought out intimate friendships with prepubescent children for companionship, and those unsupervised interactions included nudity and touching of an inappropriate nature.

Both are child abuse. But they look different. Jackson got away with it (and still does, in a sense) because we don't understand his motivations the way we can for Epstein, so we can't recognize what happened.

[–] Ninpuukamui@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago

those unsupervised interactions included nudity and touching of an inappropriate nature.

This is unproven, right?

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 18 points 12 hours ago

"too woke" is a term you really gotta pull out of your vocabulary. Not celebrating the life of a serial child predator isn't something that should make you feel self conscious. It's weaponized to make you sit down, shut up and not ask questions. Amplified by the same people who deserve the most scruntiy.

Honestly reading this was a bummer.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 88 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

interesting that you should mention epstein because when macaulay culkin was interviewed about that a while ago he brought up mj. mac said that one time as a child, he was scheduled to go to epsteins island when jackson called out of the blue to ask if he wanted a tour of the neverland estate. since jackson was famous, mac and his agent went to neverland, and he and jackson apparently became friends. mac stressed that he had never even gotten a creepy vibe, just that michael genuinely liked children.

maybe this was entirely coincidental, i don't know. but there is a chance that michael knew about epstein in the 90s and tried to help people steer clear.

all i know is that culkin seems like a good guy. he's called out bad practices and abuse in the industry before, to his own detriment.

Edit: Apparently that interview was faked. bummer.

[–] yyyesss@lemmy.world 27 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 6 points 5 hours ago

oh that's unfortunate. i'll add a clarification.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 136 points 17 hours ago (13 children)

I have a theory about Michael Jackson. First, a little background for reference. I am not a fan of MJ or his music. I respect his talent and what he did with it, but it's not really my style. Also, I was a child when the accusations started. We all heard and told the jokes about him diddling little boys. I have no reason to root for or against Michael's innocence.

That being said, I don't think he did anything inappropriate.

I could totally be wrong. I wasn't there and I'm not going to claim that my theory is undeniable truth, but after watching a few of his interviews, I noticed that he never acted like he did anything wrong. I get that someone without remorse would act like that, but typically they know what they did was wrong, and they lie and sneak their way around any implication of involvement. Not MJ. When asked about his "sleepovers" he never denied them. He consistently said "Yes, I did invite them over for sleepovers. Yes, we often shared a bed. We would stay up late watching movies and fall asleep in the bed. That's what a sleepover is." It didn't feel like a predator denying abuse. It felt more like asking a ten year old how his sleepover went. They'd tell you honestly what they did, if they slept in the same bed, and wouldn't think anything was weird about it, because they're just kids.

Combine that with the abuse he suffered as a kid. His father treated those kids like a troop of trained dogs. Constantly practicing, constantly performing, always bringing in more money for the family. Michael was a superstar around age 6, and did not slow down until he was an adult, away from his dad and performing for himself.

I think that Michael Jackson never really grew up. He named his ranch Neverland, from the story of Peter Pan, the boy who never grew up. I think MJ felt like HE WAS Peter Pan. He had no childhood, and never developed like the rest of us. He was a 10 year old mind in the body of an adult. I don't think the amusement park in his backyard or the pet chimp were bait to lure children in, I think he just really wanted to live in an amusement park, race go karts, and hang out with like minded children like any insanely wealthy pre-pubescent boy would. Many of the children he hung out with have said that nothing happened, including Macaulay Culkin, who was his bestie for quite a few years. Even after MJ's death, he said "He never did anything to me. I never saw him do anything. And especially at this flash point in time, I’d have no reason to hold anything back. The guy has passed on. If anything - I’m not gonna say it would be stylish or anything like that, but right now is a good time to speak up. And if I had something to speak up about, I would totally do it. But no, I never saw anything; he never did anything."

Maybe I'm wrong, maybe Macaulay was groomed and helped MJ abuse other kids and cover it up, but I think Michael was just a emotionally undeveloped abuse victim trying to reclaim the childhood he never got to experience.

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 1 points 13 minutes ago

Thanks for putting my thoughts into words. I'm of the same opinion that his own childhood was shattered and he sought a simulacrum of a childhood as an adult.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There's a conspiracy floating around that Jackson became aware of the human trafficking to the ultrawealthy and he was smeared and possibly killed for it. No real evidence but it's a fun one to think about.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago

That's your idea of fun to think about?

[–] DaMummy@hilariouschaos.com 8 points 11 hours ago

Corey Feldman also said that while almost everyone in Hollywood sexually abused him as a child, Michael Jackson is the one person that didn't. He did also say that he doesn't defend MJ anymore because others have accused him though.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 54 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

To nitpick: it's fair to say his relationships with children were inappropriate. The stipulated behavior crosses a lot of lines of propriety.

The stipulated behavior doesn't amount to being harmful or abusive.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 21 points 14 hours ago

I wouldn't say "too woke" at all.

Not having met the man, though, I'm not at liberty to decide his guilt or innocence, how mature or simple he was, how platonic or pedophilic he was.

I'd always caution against unassailable certainty, but you decide your own safety level.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 29 points 15 hours ago (7 children)

I don't think it's fair to compare Jackson to Epstein. Also, he has never been convicted, whereas Epstein was. I feel like "separate the art from the artist" applies and everyone has a different line for that. Like how people still support Polanski despite how despicable he is.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Michael is probably the hardest case of this too.

Its easy not to support, discuss or enable Kevin Spacey because while he was a brilliant actor in a few movies he wasnt irreplaceable. Michael on the other hand was likely one of the most popular and influential musical artists of the 20th century. He was a cultural phenomenon.

A lot of allegations and concerning behaviors absolutely but no convictions and a lot of people who knew him who defend him absolutely. A lot of potential substance abuse or mental health issues but also a lot of financial reasons why people may have alleged things that didnt happen...

Michael is a very grey case.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net -1 points 4 hours ago

I don't really know anything about Michael Jackson other than Thriller, Vitiligo, and the pedophilia debate. I have an easy time not engaging with his art.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 37 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

Well... Melania got a movie too, and she and her husband were both best friends with Epstein and Maxwell.

Michael Jackson was a complicated person. Extremely talented singer, songwriter, choreographer, dancer and performer from a very young age. Clearly had a strange relationship with his own race, age, and physical features. Clearly had a difficult time relating to people in a normal human way. Had a well-known child-like personality. A lot of rumors and allegations around him, and he did a lot of extremely questionable and problematic things that if nothing else, poured a lot of fuel on that particular fire. Fucked up his body with plastic surgery. Died of a doctor-supervised overdose...

What I'm getting at is that a film is about telling a story, and I do think Michael Jackson had a fascinating life story with a lot of highs and lows. I'm not sure that he's comparable to Epstein, and even if he was, I think that it depends how the film portrays him and his life.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›