this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
515 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

19875 readers
1497 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] neatchee@piefed.social 87 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Nasty hobitses did not mention radioactive particle decay or poison ~~vile~~ vial! Cat is just dead dead dead!! Suffocated, starved, sensory deprived cat!

[–] MycelialMass@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] neatchee@piefed.social 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

poison is vile, killing cats is vile, I see absolutely no problem here >.>

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Wait... So the radioactive material or poison is meant to keep the cat alive? 🤔

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

no, the vial of poison and radioactive particle connected to a device that breaks the vial when it detects the particle's decay is what makes the cat's state probabilistic. Otherwise it's just a cat in a box

[–] caradenada@feddit.cl 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

BTW, the state of the cat being probabilistic is meant to be absurd or paradoxical, since Schrodinger's cat is supposed to be a thought experiment against quantum superposition.

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yup. Turns out he was super wrong though and existence is just that fucked up at the quantum level

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tell that to your imaginary Gollum that claims without that stuff, the cat is dead. lol

[–] neatchee@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

..... it's a sealed box with no holes ..... the cat is very dead or will be very soon

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

it's meant to keep schroedinger away

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

A box without a lid, no way to check on the cat, and no air holes. That cat is dead. It was always going to die.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Going to, but there was no given time frame. So you don't know if it is dead, yet

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 1 points 2 weeks ago

By the time you ask the question, you are unquestionably sick, sadistic, & cruel because no one lives long enough to be otherwise.

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Are you also dead because you're guaranteed to die eventually? It's not an experiment of the eventual outcome but the observation of the outcome. While you're observing the cat it has to be alive or dead, it can't be both. But when you stop observing the certainty disappears and the cat is no longer dead or alive but both at the same time.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Depends on the size of the box and how long it’s been

[–] how_we_burned@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

What's really in the box are the 12 year old girls Schroedinger used to rape

[–] SuspiciousCatThing@pawb.social 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

What

Edit: okay yep wow that's true. Damn. Okay. Today's lesson was not in quantum mechanics.

[–] pageflight@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

From Forbes:

Quoting directly from Schrödinger’s diaries, Moore revealed that the physicist justified his attraction to girls by considering that, being a genius (which he believed no woman ever could be), he was naturally entitled. “It seems to be the usual thing that men of strong, genuine intellectuality are immensely attracted only by women who, forming the very beginning of the intellectual series, are as nearly connected to the preferred springs of nature as they themselves. Nothing intermediate will do, since no woman will ever approach nearer to genius by intellectual education than some unintellectuals do by birth so to speak.”

TIL. Ugh.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

He in the Trump-Einstein-Files?

[–] white_nrdy@programming.dev 15 points 2 weeks ago
[–] csolisr@hub.azkware.net 1 points 1 week ago

Schrödinger's Discord Kitties, as it were

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Shouldn’t they both be right

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 43 points 2 weeks ago

Luckily, Bilbo remembered to add "Answer fully"

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 10 points 2 weeks ago

Alive and death at the same time. It's more like asking if the coin is heads or tails when the coin is still spinning.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Not if they are both wrong.

[–] Bunitonito@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

No, the cat is one or the other. Radioactive half-life is the point at which there is a 50/50 chance that any single isotope had decayed, and we usually work around that in classical systems by using large sample sizes (a pile of isotopes, it's easy to see that half of it would have decayed). But for one single isotope we aren't observing (or the cat), we need to look at it in terms of probabilities until we observe it

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

is the cat a qualifed observer>

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, it's a conscientious objector

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

am i a qualified observer[9]?

[–] Slovene85@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The correct answer is yes.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Slovene85@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

(⁠╯⁠°⁠□⁠°⁠)⁠╯⁠︵⁠ ⁠┻⁠━⁠┻

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Eventually dead, from multiple potential causes. Especially with no lid.

[–] Bunitonito@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

... It'd be a lot easier to explain this if Schroedinger had a whole pile of boxes with cats in them

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

oh god you just made me write the stupidest nerdiest song about schroedinger in about half a second and the chorus goes "and he's got boxes and boxes and boxes of cats/ yeah he's got boxes and boxes and boxes of cats" i feel so ashamed

[–] Bunitonito@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

'and half of them are dead / but what about THIS ONE? / nobody knows, nobody knowwwws'

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

YOU HEAR IT TOO

oh gods. i'm going to ask my wife if it's coming out my teeth

edit: she says yes it's coming out your teeth, you're singing

[–] jafffacakelemmy@mander.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago

just shake the box up a bit. you'll soon know if the cat inside is alive or dead!?

[–] sepi@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Aren't we all?