this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2026
67 points (97.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38691 readers
1395 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For those say in their 60s or 70s here. When you were in your 30's or 40's did you have the feeling that the world was a fucked up place? So much has been going on since I entered adulthood in the early 2000s and I feel like it's getting more and more intense. It's never ending.

Is it unique? Or has it always been this way?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

Well, as an American, I can only speak for my lifetime...

Late 60s/Early 70s - Vietnam/Nixon - Pretty fucked up.

Late 70s - Iran hostage crisis - Fucked up.

80s - Reagan/Bush - Iran/Contra - Recession - Iraq War I - Fucked up.

90s - Clinton era was pretty good. Big scandal was a blowjob. People actively talking about blowjobs all the time.

2000s - Bush II, 9/11, Iraq War II, Abu Ghraib, 2008 financial crash - VERY fucked up.

Late 2000s - Obama - Not awful. He should have ended Bush's drone program, but not awful.

2017-2020 - Trump. Covid. 1,000,000 dead Americans. INCREDIBLY fucked up.

Early 2020s - Biden - Fucked up inflation. Covid weirdness.

Now? (gestures)

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 hours ago

Generally, things were always fucked up. However, two major changes between this generation and previous ones:

  1. Leaders were generally portrayed as being more competent than now. Even leaders who were considered dumb at the time kept themselves to a far higher standard than now.

  2. The media landscape is more fractured now than before. It was common for television shows to be seen by a third of the country. It made things more uniform culturally. A lot of that is gone

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, thought it was fucked up, but assumed the vast majority of people still wanted it to be better for everyone. Recent US elections, though, indicate otherwise, which is extremely depressing.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

assumed the vast majority of people still wanted it to be better for everyone.

You're still right. They're just propagandized into believing that what's better for a tiny minority of rich people will make things better for everyone else.

[–] Curious_Canid@piefed.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

It really depends on how you define it. There have always been locations and groups where things were terrible and there have been locations and groups where things were good. Often the locations were the same but the groups were different.

In the US, there was a general sense that things were gradually improving that may have gone back as far as World War II and lasted through the 70's. Not that there weren't a lot of problems, just that society seemed to be recognizing and working on them. The conservative resurgence in 1980, lead by Ronald Reagan and Newt Gringrich, pretty much ended that positive trend. Since then we've seen active efforts to divide people, to encourage prejudices, and, especially, to destroy the education system. That last is critical, because it makes propaganda and other forms of social manipulation far more effective.

The US is now living with the result of allowing those changes. There are vast disparities in education, wealth, and power across the population. Many people on the low end of those distributions have been convinced to blame other groups that are also on the low end. That has allowed those at the high end to corrupt our political and economic systems to their advantage.

The current situation is not sustainable, but it will do incalculable damage to hundreds of millions of people while it exists. And we don't know what will follow it.

There is strong evidence that humans became successful as a species because of their ability to put interests of the group before their own. Those instincts have been subverted, but they are not dead. That is what gives me hope for the future.

[–] tangible@piefed.social 16 points 5 hours ago

My take is that everything was worse back in the day, except for two things: climate change due to an unprecedented rate of global warming, and the ability to bomb ourselves out of existence with nuclear weapons, which simply did not exist before 1945. I worry about the first more than the second.

[–] RedCarCastle@aussie.zone 69 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Always has been, the big difference is it wasn't streamed straight into your eyes in real time

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Yep, only in my 50s but this is correct. All the shit under Reagan, Nixon etc, decades of meddling in the middle east before that. A century of oppressing South America. All the labor struggles. It's like the increase in the diagnosed cases of autism. The number of cases didn't increase. Only our awareness.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 6 points 5 hours ago

Yep, you had to get out of bed, and walk a few miles, if you wanted to see public torture and humiliation of others.

But executions and all that were public events. Not behind closed doors like today.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 37 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

No, no it was not.

Example: when they found out what caused the hole in the ozone layer, they fixed it.

If we found out now, people would say that you can't trust Big Academia or Big Science and nothing would be done. And don't get me started on vaccinations.

We're sliding rapidly backwards.

People who say it isn't are just too lazy to do anything.

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago (11 children)

Stopping climate change is ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE harder than protecting the ozone layer. Protecting ozone requires switching the chemicals we used in refrigerants and propellants to other, viable alternatives. That affected products worth, generously, maybe 1% of GDP?

Stopping climate changing the vast majority of the vehicles on the planet, along with the majority of our electrical power plants. It also necessitates stopping deforestation and overhauling a wide number of industrial processes, including for basic materials like steel and concrete. And that's not even getting into methane emissions from livestock.

All of these things add up to a massive chunk of the planets GDP. It's an extremely heavy lift, and it's not fair to say that the world has gotten worse because we're struggling more with climate change than the ozone hole.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I feel @starlinguk@lemmy.world was saying more than that. I don't recall any serious studies or news articles suggesting the ozone hole was a hoax or that debunking a human cause. Although it was kinda an aside but the anti vaxine thing he points to. I mean one of the most effective medical interventions since soap and sterilization has people acting like its some sort of evil witchcraft that will actually harm you despite the clear evidence both clinical and personal to its effectiveness.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

But there were a lot of news articles suggesting at that time that global warming was overrated.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

But at that time the science was just solidifying so overrated was not that contrary to say its overrated or inconclusive or something. Its like at one point there was a microbiologist that thought hiv was a passenger virus and did not cause aids. Which at the time was reasonable given koch's postulates although they are basically impossible to apply to aids but eventually we had some much evidence built up that it became moot. Which is very similar with global warming. Someone might say we don't know enough or have done enough studies and that might be reasonable in the 50's but becomes silly by the 90's

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know of any for the ozone hole specifically, but you can look to the fight over cigarettes to see the same science-denying approach during the 50s and beyond. That was literally the blueprint for climate change denial by the fossil fuel industry in later decades.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I think that is an apt comparison and it just outlines the things to me. We really did not know smoking was bad till the 40's and the 50's is when it was much more conclusive and the industry was able to push off legislation for like a decade into the 60's. The greenhouse effect although known for awhile similarly did not really become conclusive till the 50's and still it was like the late eighties when congressional hearings brought it more into the us public sphere although many folk still did not really know about it till gores 2006 movie put it more into the common culture. The industry fud started with the congressional hearings when there was indication it might lead to regulation. So they have pretty effectively stalled it for the most part for over 30 years! In addition we have had some regulation and then had it pulled back. I think it really highlights the decline compared to before when you look at cigarettes compared to greenhouse gases.

[–] LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I guess. You could also look at things like plastic pollution where industry straight up won, and during the 60s-70s successfully pushed the responsibility onto consumers to recycle while continuing to crank out single use plastic with very few restrictions.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 34 minutes ago

I don't think the industry did much there. Consumers were not exactly avoiding plastics. There was kinda a few attempts to avoid them but they did not really go anywhere except for maybe the reusable shopping bags. I have to say I used to love and get the 16 ounce pop bottles that had the deposit that you got back when you brought them back. I would be buying them now if the pop industry had not phased them out. Was still able to get them even in the first year or so of the 90's. That ones a hard comparison.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You must realize terrible stuff was happening over that time period too. Yes, there is a ton of regression happening right now, but compared to any other time in history some things are better some are worse. One can probably select any two points in modern history and say the same. There are always great and terrible things happening.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 4 hours ago

I think it depends how we slice it. last century compared to previous. yeah will take this century. this quarter century to the quarter century before. Ill take before. I mean if we are at the tail of of a falling post world war 2 blip that is not a great thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It was different, there was more of what at least looked like cause->effect. People were irrational, but not directly belligerent about their irrationality. Round table talk formats didn't seem so useless, there being people who were more learned than you giving useful explanations about what was happening in the world (that made sense). Watching them now seems like the blind leading the blind. The world was more coherent and the incoherent parts of it seemed largely marginalized and sidelined. This marginalization seemed fairly permanent, like you could count on society making progress in science and technology without regard to your stupid uncle's sexist bullshit or your crazy aunt's vitamin therapy and aversion to aluminum cookware. Now all of them are wrapped up in one Super Saiyan called "Secretary of Health and Human Services."

[–] angelmountain@lemy.nl 1 points 2 hours ago

Almost everything now is better than ever before. The problem is that the news is telling you all is bad. Stop watching it. This includes your social media feeds. Just don't read it. Do something else with your time. Go outside.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The creation of the universe was a mistake. It's been downhill since the big bang.

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 11 points 4 hours ago

This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

—Douglas Adams

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 18 points 6 hours ago (4 children)

This is actually one of the best times in human history.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Not anymore. Conflict around the world has statistically shot way up. There's also a significant increase in political polarisation around the world.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 2 hours ago

If you're comparing to a decade ago, yes. However, even with the increased number of wars, it is still more peaceful than before 1945.

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I question that. In colonial times and in tribal times, there were huge amounts of conflicts. And conflicts is only a tiny part of how the world is running. Slavery, human rights, minority treatment, just laws, poverty, standard of living, etc. On average world wide, we are far better off. The majority of the people in the first world have luxuries that only kings and nobles used to have.

[–] meejle@piefed.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Those conflicts didn't have drone strikes though

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 7 points 5 hours ago

You're right on both counts.

Like most things though it depends what metric you're using.

Access to medical care for example is better than its ever been.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheWeirdestCunt@lemmy.today 20 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

We didn't start the fire was written for this exact reason. Billy Joel was talking to someone 20 years younger than him who said that when he was 20 more stuff had happened than when Billy Joel was 20, so he just started listing all the stuff that had happened before he was 20 and then expanded it into the song.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 hours ago

If only Fall Out Boy wrote the update better.

[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 22 points 7 hours ago

It used to be a lot worse for the vast majority

[–] Norin@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

As a little preface here, I teach philosophy and world religions at community colleges for a living, and so I spend a good bit of time reading texts from ancient cultures.

The relevant thing here being that it’s pretty common to find writings from just about every point in human history that talk about their own time as one of terrible injustice, iniquity, etc. often in ways that sound like they could have written today.

So, I’d wager it’s always been this way, and not just in the last century.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 17 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Not an old person. But so to put into perspective:

My maternal grandmother was born in war-torn China after the japanese imperilists wrecked our country. Food was not even a guarantee... farming sucked...

My parents were born during the cultural revolution... the way they described stuff... all they had to eat was 番薯 (sweet potatoes?)... they say my generation had it better off...

I remember rations were said to be a common thing...

By my era, I had stable access to food. I remember being so picky and they scold me for me... "back in my day... all we had to eat was..."

I wanted more things to play with... its responded with... "back in my day... all we had to play with is..." (don't remember the answer but they played with like rocks or sticks or strings or stuff like that)

Literally... all the food would've been a luxury in their era...

So like... in a way... westerners having access to food is already not bad...

I mean y'all are not being invaded by imperial japanese...

y'all not being bombed by russians in Ukraine....

y'all not being bombed by israel in Gaza

so...

(I'm not saying you should accept status quo, just trying to think positively by looking into how bad it could get...)

-From an American Citizen originally born in China in 2002

Edit: I also wanna mention the problem with people who grow up under these conditions... they had to deal with so much "real issues" that the whole topic of mental health is never a thing to them... "just get over it" as my parents say...

UGH WTF...

So yea... the west have mental health acceptance... so consider yourselves lucky...

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 19 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

OP keep this in mind.

During and 18 month period in the early 1970s there was an average of five domestic terrorist bombings in the US every day. Think about that.. five a day was the average.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 3 points 4 hours ago

Ah, that does warm my European heart.

The world is on fire, climate change looks to be a thing that will just happen, wars, everything getting more expensive with no hope in sight... but at least the US has less bombings!

I get that things have been shitty all the time, but generally the direction has been towards better things. I dunno if we reached a point where things are as good as it gets and getting better is more and more difficult, but I personally feel that things are in some sort of a turning point. I know I'm a grumpy fuck, but I've really tried to always look on the bright side of life (whistle) but I haven't really found anything worth looking forwards to. Plaargh.

load more comments
view more: next ›