this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2026
118 points (97.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48282 readers
1374 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've only absorbed bits and pieces of the story, but allegedly there's an age verification push happening on Linux? What's the full story here?

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 68 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

An optional field was added to the userdb to allow storing birthdate. That's it.

The systemd project merged a pull request adding a new birthDate field to the JSON user records managed by userdb in response to the age verification laws of California, Colorado, and Brazil.

This is the same record that already holds basic user metadata like realName, emailAddress, and location. The field stores a full date in YYYY-MM-DD format and can only be set by administrators, not by users themselves.

An optional field in the userdb JSON object. It's not a policy engine, not an API for apps. We just define the field, so that it's standardized iff [sic] people want to store the date there, but it's entirely optional.

--Lennart Poettering

https://itsfoss.com/news/systemd-age-verification/

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 41 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Also, it wasn't a core maintainer who created the PR, which you want for something this sensitive.

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 15 points 2 months ago

Why would it matter who it was that contributed the code?

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago

It's just an extra field that was added to the UserDB. The methods used to access that information have not chaged AFAIK.

[–] 4vr@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

All that matters was PR got merged.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah who knows next PR could implement age verification via rectal print verified by aliens from the 7th dimension.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

entirely optional

Until its not. Rome wasnt destroyed in a day

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes, but the slippery slope is also a fallacy.

Caution is better than panic.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There's ample evidence there is an organised international push for these mass surveillance efforts in many countries all at once, do you deny this?

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I would argue, for now, this is malicious compliance from the open source community.

Adding an optional field in the UserDB to store an age covers the requirements of the law, without trying to help with the spirit of the law

But I do understand the boiling the frog side

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 5 points 2 months ago

Assuming some jurisdictions implement some kind of device based age restrictions, should linux just not exist in those places?

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 5 points 2 months ago

Lets be cautious and remove the mechanism.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

iff [sic]

In case you are unaware, "iff" is short for "if and only if", i.e. bidirectional implication. It's not a typo.

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

It is a word, but I don't think it's really applicable here. The standard exists even if no one wants to use it or ever does.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 7 points 2 months ago

Fix: a useless field was added by a random non-core contributor, and merged by a Microsoft employee.

[–] mhzawadi@lemmy.horwood.cloud 2 points 2 months ago

As long as I dont need to install a GUI on all my headless servers I couldn't give 2 hoots, also while I'm at it. As long as I dont need to workout how I get a GUI on an Aws instance that is headless

[–] Heyla@quokk.au 1 points 2 months ago

Presenting information deliberately out of context, stripped down to its bare essentials, amounts to spreading misinformation.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

iff [sic]

Brought to you by the same people as HTTP_REFERER, I assume ;-)

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 5 points 2 months ago

iff = "if and only if"

Basically saying the field's there if you need to comply with the law, but otherwise you don't need to use it, just like the other fields.

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Exactly, making it possible for admins (parents) to set up systems with rules based on age for their many children

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 9 points 2 months ago

They can install some parental controls from the package manager. This doesnot need to be in fucking systemd.

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

A bunch of US states (and other western countries) are flirting with, passing or have already passed laws saying operating systems must implement "age verification" for the completely disingenuous purpose of "protecting the children" or the companies that make the Linux distros will be liable for infringement and severe penalties. This, naturally, makes many of the companies involved that make Linux distros really eager to implement age verification. Many of said companies are backed and funded by large, powerful tech companies who are lobbying for exactly this legislation because it makes life extremely difficult and uncertain for Linux users, while at the same time it makes life easier for them and their extremely child-unfriendly content platforms that they want to maintain the ability to manipulate children with and blame Linux when children get manipulated by it saying that Linux should've told them the user was a child and it was actually Linux's fault that the child got manipulated, not them.

Meanwhile, the users and maintainers of Linux itself, the systems that make up Linux, and even the maintainers and contributors to many Linux distros, who are real human people and not faceless corporations, think following unjustified laws is unjustified, see through this lobbying for the dishonest cop-out it is, think this is fucking garbage, and are telling the corpo scum to go fuck themselves with rusty knives. This is entirely appropriate and reasonable in this case.

Hope that helps explain what's going on.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

the users and maintainers of Linux itself, the systems that make up Linux, and even the maintainers and contributors to many Linux distros, who are real human people and not faceless corporations, think following unjustified laws is unjustified

They do? Sorry but this law is a nothing burger I don't think I've seen any serious contributors to serious distros say anything about it that matches the tone of Reddit/Lemmy posts or single maintainer distros.

Hell the systemd fork being slop by someone who didn't understand the existing systemd ratelimiting really excemplified how reddit the whole circus is.

[–] bilouba@jlai.lu 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They added a field and everyone is losing their minds because systemd has already a bad reputation for doing too much and being too powerful and also because everyone hate age verification so they don't want it in their free OS so it crystalize the hate. There was something about AI too if I recall. I don't want US law to impact international FOSS and I don't want any kind of identity or age verification inside my OS so I understand and share the rage. But this change was very much not a big or impactful thing. Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'm 70% confident on the issue.

[–] black0ut@pawb.social 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The issue is that some idiot suddenly appeared on the systemd repo to immediately push a change that adds the posibility of logging the user's age into systemd. The community complained and explained that nobody wanted that change, and yet this idiot pushed through, ignored the feedback, and ended up getting the pull request merged. Not only that, but the discussion thread was locked to prevent criticism, and the merge was done by Microsoft employees. After the merge, someone tried to undo the change, and the effort was blocked by a Microsoft employee.

Despite the excuses, Systemd is not an OS, and it doesn't even need to comply with any age verification laws. The fact that someone went and implemented a deeply unpopular change into a system that shouldn't even deal with that info and that is used by most Linux distros, just to aid a surveillance government in implementing better surveillance on the entire world's users is what lead to the pushback.

Additionally, Lennart Poettering used Claude to review the pull request, and has been using it for developing SystemD. I'm not gonna go too deep into that, but trust me, it's really bad.

Double additionally, Lennart Poettering also defended not properly securing this sensitive data, because that would be too bothersome for him.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

thats cool until you find out the reason for that is he founded a company that's goal is to turn desktop into locked down android.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah... Didnt know..

[–] black0ut@pawb.social 4 points 2 months ago

He quit because of optics (understandably, Linux people didn't like a Microsoft employee making software that was in almost every distro), but he still works with Microsoft and other Microsoft employees

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

I guess I stop using systemd or what now

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

The AI was the slopfork written by one of the hyperventilating redditors.

You pretty right except the California law that the systemd change was in response to doesn't do verification it just returns whatever age bracket is stored.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

~~They have changed course, thankfully:~~

https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/41179

edit: my mistake, I saw this briefly earlier today and thought it had been merged, not just closed.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

They haven't, whatever your opinion on it...

Pottering responded no and closed it, stating it's just an optional field others can use how they please

[–] Qwel@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 months ago

Read the dam things you post >_<

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 6 points 2 months ago

Can you point to the part where the revert got merged?

[–] rosco385@lemmy.wtf 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

This is a hitpiece, imo completely the wrong tone to have this discussion in.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Looks like Microsoft funds and maintains systemd so they can exert control over all the Linux bistros and force this shit in

[–] GreatBlueHeron@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you believe Microslop funds and maintains systemd because Lennart Poettering works there, or is there more to it than that?

If it's just that Poettering works there, you may be interested to know that he left in January this year.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lennart Poettering left Microsoft, not systemd

And they left for PR reasons, to literally appear not evil and to "build trust"

[–] GreatBlueHeron@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I've never followed the people or the politics - I just started using systemd when it appeared in whatever disto I was using at the time and liked it. I'm trying to catch up now because I have reservations about using projects that incorporate AI (and I'm learning this may be impossible to avoid) and I most certainly won't use anything that implements age verification. (The irony of typing this on a device that has age verification via my credit card hurts)

I accept that Microsoft had significant influence over systemd when Poettering worked there, but I don't understand how they do now.

I also understand that Poettering likes Windows, and wants to make Linux more like Windows. That's not the same as Microsoft controlling systemd.

Are you saying that Amutable is just a front for Microsoft?

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago

I don't know, I barely follow it, I just see pattern and point it out. Systemd is a systemic risk and a ripe target for sabotage/compromise of all distros

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 0 points 2 months ago

Nothing. Linux is not going to force you to identify or provide your real age. Next question.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

Redditor going full reddit over a law that they haven't read and a pull request they barely understand.