this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
385 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

83069 readers
3766 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 185 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I have said it before, and I'll say it again.

An adblocker is part on my security suite on my computer.

Ads can be hijacked to spread malware, and unless the site owner agrees to take both financial and legal liability for the possible dammage caused by their website I will never consider removing my adblocker.

If they agreed to take on the responsibility, I still wouldn't remove my adblocker, but I would consider it.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I mean, even CIA recommends the use of an adblocker for personal cybersecurity. And one or two other US agencies too.

[–] JayGray91@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago

The FBI too recommends adblockers as part of general web browsing security.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

On top of three letter agencies, basically every cybersecurity expert that publishes a "basic tweaks" article recommends uBlock Origin.

[–] Apollo98@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (6 children)

What’s your preferred adblocker?

[–] notabot@piefed.social 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ublock origin does a pretty solid job, I'm always mildly horrified when I have to use a browser without it. Is that really what other people see when they browse the web?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] PushButton@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This is basically the definition of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

uBlock Origin is the gold standard, but you need something that supports the full version. Plain Chrome (and most forks) are not good enough.

Firefox, Helium, and/or Orion would be my top picks.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

uBlock Origin

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 106 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Unless the user is actively navigating, the header is dead weight. The header should hide on scrollDown and reveal on scrollUp. Let the content breathe.

This one I actually hate. Often I just want to scroll up a few pixels, either to satisfy a mild compulsion or to align the content so I can see most of it. This is completely ruined if the navbar pops back in. Leave it at the top of the page, where it belongs, not at the top of the viewport!

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 29 points 1 week ago

It really depends on the site for me.

What I really hate is a table that's multiple scrolls long where the header row doesn't follow.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

IMO the header should stay at the top as part of the page. I know where it is, I'll scroll up to it if I need to.

Like you, I find a header appearing and hiding quite difficult in specific circumstances.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

100%. i like using the top of the screen to mark my place in reading. sometimes i need to scroll back up and these headers completely fuck up my reading experience.

but luckily Reader View exists, so i usually just use that.

[–] new_world_odor@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I feel your pain. The really good ones plan for this, some pop up immediately when you scroll up and that sucks. The proper thing to do (imo) is to wait for the user to scroll 80% of the viewport back up, only then letting it begin to slide in, and have it slide in at a rate 1/2 of the page scroll. I do like having it easily available, but it should feel like it's trying to stay out of the way.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The iOS browser has always supported “tap the top of the viewport to scroll all the way up,” which largely allows for what you say: just leave the nav way up there. Last time I looked was years ago, and Android Chrome didn’t did this. Does it now?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I have this usercss:

[data-testid="header"],
[data-mobile-fixed="1"],
[data-remove-fixed="0"] {
  position: absolute !important;
  width: 100%;
}
main { padding-top: 2rem !important; }

Works well enough on most sites. And on those it doesn't, you can easily exclude.

Can likely be expanded, but adding just header broke more than it fixed.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

At the same time, it needs to be comfortably thin.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 63 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I have to admit, I hadn’t realized it had got this bad. How did this get normalized?

I browse with most scripts disabled, and have since JS was first introduced to the browser. What I’ve observed is that some pages contain NO actual content, or just the first paragraph, when I load them. I read what’s provided and move on. If the site is hostile to me reading their content they worked so hard to get in front of me, I’m not going to do any extra work to find out what it is.

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is mostly because the bar is measured in time to display content (forgot the name of the metric)

So the huge about of bullshit gets hidden by fast internet and asynchronous jobs.

[–] haulyard@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it’s “First paint” or something like that.

[–] vinnymac@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Ironically somehow AI is making disabling JS better nowadays, because text/markdown is becoming normalized, so receiving a pure text version of a page is a thing again.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 5 points 1 week ago

How did this get normalized?

The average user doesn't know or understand technical details, and don't believe they have any power to change anything

Also capitalism means a small number of assholes make most of the decisions for reasons that benefit them

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Just like the bad old days, when entire sites were made in Flash and Linux users were shafted. Ridiculous.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It makes me glad for having been born when I was. I am a younger Millennial, so I wasn't online for the early internet, but I am old enough that when I read this blog post, it reminds me that I have seen firsthand that it wasn't always this bad — even if, like you, I was surprised to realise how bad things have gotten. I feel like a frog boiling in water that started cool, but gradually became hotter^[1]

I feel sorry for Zoomers and younger, who have grown up only knowing the walked gardens of big tech. It invokes an odd sense of ethical duty in me; many of them believe they hate tech in all its forms, because all they know is the toxic cycle of dark patterns and a culture that expects them to be always contactable, making it hard to disengage. However, there's an entire world that they don't know that beyond the walled garden. I wish I could show them what I have seen, but you can't easily convey the magic of a memory — after all, the internet that shaped me no longer exists.

So I guess the challenge ahead of me is trying to figure out how I can work with them to co-create a vision of a better internet. We can't put all the enshittification and spambots back in Pandora's box, but maybe we can build something new if people like us can use our memories to distribute hope to where it's needed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

I prefer http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ because it doesn’t think it knows better than I do what width I want my window to be.

[–] hitstun@feddit.online 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From Website Carbon:

a screenshot from a web site that checks the carbon footprint of a page load on another web site; it says "A+Website carbon results for: perfectmotherfuckingwebsite.comHurrah! This web page achieves a carbon rating of A+This is cleaner than 100% of all web pages globally"

Nice! Less than 0.01g of CO2 is produced every time someone visits this web page.

Holy shit! That web site lives up to its name! I want to redesign my site to be that fast and elegant.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah I'm not convinced that this site is accurate. According to this my blog pollutes more than facebook . com (I'm apparently as dirty as netflix . com) and is only slightly dirtier than newyorktimes . com... And images . google . com gets an A... I ain't buying it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Meanwhile people out here hosting websites on disposable vapes.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's not all that impressive if you're familiar with microcontrollers. Running a webstack doesn't require much compute power.

I want to know if it can run Doom.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sort of, it's just short on internal memory so they mostly render on PC to the screen on the vape.

https://youtu.be/rVsvtEj9iqE

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

So no, it can't run Doom.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

One php command can be a server. It's how you can easily test run a website.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

On the topic of load time, it didn't even mention the compulsory "prove you are human" Cloudflare gate on practically every website these days. Add 10 seconds to every visit.

[–] datendefekt@feddit.org 23 points 1 week ago

If you miss how the web was before everything became Plattform, this might be a good place to drop kagis small web initiative: https://kagi.com/smallweb

[–] vext01@feddit.uk 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's go back to gopher?

Read the guardian over the gopher protocol at my gopher hole:

gopher://theunixzoo.co.uk/the-guardian

[–] notabot@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thank you for this, it makes for a nicer reading experience than their own website! Is the code open source by any chance?

[–] vext01@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

Good to hear.

I've not released it because I hacked it up very quickly.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pretty ironic this blog runs multiple scripts that get blocked by ublock origin

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They seem to be for goatcounter, an "Easy web analytics. No tracking of personal data." and cloudflare insights.

The entire blog post is still just 750kB in total.

"Why do people not read articles anymore and just go by what the headline says?"

The articles people are supposed to read:

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That was a great read. I have worked at companies that lived on display ads and it’s a terrible, desperate business to be in. Personally I think branded display ads have always had zero value (or even negative value) and the better the net has gotten at tracking their value, the more this has come to light, the less advertisers are willing to pay, and therefore the more fuckery publishers engage in to try to survive. It’s extremely hard or impossible to deliver a good user experience under this set of incentives.

Thinking back to the print news era, a lot of the ads were local, which made them much more valuable. But now the net has snuffed out local retail too, so that model isn’t even there to fall back on if we tried.

I’m grateful now to be working somewhere that doesn’t survive on display ads, and that may be one of the big reasons I’ve stuck with this employer for almost a decade now.

[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I purchased Ad Guard for my Android phone seven or eight years ago and it's a game changer. I despise ads and it's jarring to use someone else's phone.

load more comments
view more: next ›