this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2026
367 points (96.5% liked)

World News

54784 readers
3040 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Ignore that fascist bastards whining. He dug his own ass into it let him dig himself out

[–] Jaybird@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He should be pleading. But he is demanding. That's the weird part. He does not have the cards for demanding.

You break it, you own it. He attacked, without reason. Hell! According to them its not even a war. Get congress to declare war first, then we talk.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago

Surprisingly, Starmer has so far shown signs of having a spine. He must be facing a backbench revolt.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 28 points 2 days ago

"I want Greenland! Give me Greenland, or I'll go to war with Europe! Give me what I want OR ELSE! "

3 months later:

"You better help me save face from my virtuosically incompetent war strategy OR ELSE!"

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Sane-washing title

the US president urged Britain and other nations – including France, China and Japan – to send warships to the area to protect oil tankers from Iranian attacks.

Not a good sign if we are asking China to change our diaper.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"We don't need your ships"

24 hours later...

"Please send your ships"

"BTW, we already won the war, but please help"

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Just one week ago he "truthed":

The United Kingdom, our once Great Ally, maybe the Greatest of them all, is finally giving serious thought to sending two aircraft carriers to the Middle East. That’s OK, Prime Minister Starmer, we don’t need them any longer — But we will remember. We don’t need people that join Wars after we’ve already won!

What? Wasn't already won one week ago, and no help was needed? Now it needs to beg for help?

[–] metermatic26@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

This is the same country that was seriously planning to invade and annex Greenland just three months ago. They might have postponed their plans in favor of bombing Iran, but Greenland is still on the table.

So Europe may suffer the economic consequences of this mess, but the White House getting humiliated and the US military getting degraded and bogged down in Iran are both a boon for Europe.

My only fear that some European leaders (looking at you Starmer) might actually be stupid enough to follow them in this folly out of some misplaced sense of appeasement.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 days ago

I'm starting to think he was never very good at the businesses and the strategies all along!

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You people decided you didn't need the UK back in 1776. No take backsies.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

I mean, he decided he didn't want us just a week ago...

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9dn3j04lydo

Trump accuses Starmer of seeking to 'join wars after we've already won'

It's already won. What's the problem?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

But that was over a 20% tariff on tea!

[–] axh@lemmy.world 204 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Why would they join the war that is already won?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 120 points 3 days ago (3 children)

My god he is such a fucking idiot. He just insulted them and told them their help wasnt needed. Just a stupid, pathetic, hatefull asshole.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

The infinite might of the United States is unable to hold and defend a 24-mile wide body of water.

Think about that for a second.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 133 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 94 points 3 days ago
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Please spend billions of dollars to pull my ass out of the fire!"

France already told him to go fuck himself.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 hours ago

UK, Germany, France and Spain, so far, and I believe also even his fellow fascists running Italy.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’m going to tell you like I told George Bush. Go fuck yourself.

-France

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Instead of renaming French Fries to Freedom Fries, they'll just ban them, and people who make them in their air fryers at home will be designated terrorists, and be executed.

As a result, the potato futures will plunge, and the entire potato industry will be destroyed, farms will go out of business, animal feed will be short, leading to meat shortages.

And the MAGAs will be on TV saying "It was hilarious to see the Libz getting angry because there were no fries at McDonalds, which was our objective.

"The fact that another major commodity market was destroyed as a direct result couldn't be predicted, and isn't our fault, or our problem.

"Thanks to President Trump's leadership, we achieved OUR objective in record time, and this operation was a TOTAL SUCCESS!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 72 points 3 days ago

I thought he didn't need our ships for a war already won.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 1 points 1 day ago

Amerisrael is on the genocide route, and Iran is playing the role of Undyne. What a world.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

What in Frankensteins vagflaps is going on with his face? It looks like it was sewn together from discarded bits of uncooked chicken skin

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] metalGoat1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Where the fuck is Israel in this war? Where are their soldiers?

[–] Soulg@ani.social 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 15 points 2 days ago (4 children)

According to the article, this is what he said:

Hopefully China, France, Japan, South Korea, the UK, and others, that are affected by this artificial constraint will send ships to the area so that the Hormuz Strait will no longer be a threat by a nation that has been totally decapitated.

How does that turn into this?

Donald Trump pleads for UK to send warships to secure Strait of Hormuz

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lithiumground@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

USA and Zionists just bring chaos and instability to the region .

Gulf countries and Iran could find a middle ground and agree to peace , but zionists wants greater Israel ,USa wants resources

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago

“That’s OK, Prime Minister Starmer, we don’t need them any longer — But we will remember. We don’t need people that join Wars after we’ve already won!”

Huh.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I submit the following: an oil shock and the resultant recession/depression is worth enduring so that the world may be rid of Trump. Let the idiot wear his blunder, and may the economic disaster he unleashed be forever known as the Trump Slump. The alternative might be WW3.

One thing, though: we must help Ukraine defeat Putin. Russia is getting a huge boost right now from Trumps's blunder. If the UK and others send ships anywhere, it should be to blockade Russia.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Alternatively, the UK can kick out the US and Israeli ambassadors and its oil will be allowed to pass the Strait.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This timeline is unrealistic and poorly thought out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

The problem with the American military doctrine, is that they don't have one; everytime they need to fight a war, they find somebody else to be the troops while they stick to a "support" role.

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Does he mean the strait that is only insecure because HE made it insecure ? Good job by the way !

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 56 points 3 days ago (5 children)

The only official response to him from the UK should be the direct quote about not needing the UK. No additional words. Don't take any words out. Just the exact quote.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›