Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Trump, the climate change denialist, doing his best to speed up the green energy transition.
Just a chaos cultist trying to heat up the world.
Decarbonise already FFS, make this irrelevant
Irrelevant for us. The loss of a major shipping route is always going to be a blow to the regional economy.
Trump went like "Why just stop with US when I can fuck supermarket prices globally"
Gas prices go brrrrrrr
Wright posted that "the US Navy successfully escorted an oil tanker through the Strait of Hormuz to ensure oil remains flowing to global markets," crediting President Donald Trump with "maintaining stability of global energy during the military operations against Iran."
Within hours, a senior source in the IRGC's naval force told Iranian outlet Iran Now that the claim "has no basis in truth," insisting that no US-escorted tanker had transited the strait.
The source described the announcement as part of a "media war and attempts to mislead public opinion," adding that the strait remains under "precise surveillance" by Iranian forces and that "any military movement in the area is fully monitored."
Wright subsequently deleted the post without public explanation, undermining a week of administration messaging aimed at convincing the world that commercial traffic would soon resume.
For an administration that relies so heavily on propaganda lies, they are remarkably terrible at lying.
In any case, even if it were true and not a pathetic lie, Donald Trump would deserve no credit for slightly mitigating the problems Donald Trump caused when Donald Trump decided to start bombing Iran and slaughtering its civilians.
At a certain point the propaganda stops making any sense on purpose. It's not designed to deceive. It's used to identify resistance.
the timeline in which the IGRC's public statement are more trustworthy than US officials...
Oil companies and oil tanker crews are subject to the same fog of war as everyone else. They don't know if there are mines. They don't know if they can trust the US government to protect them or pay out the insurance. They have seen US bases get bombed. They don't know if the US is lying or not because trust in the US is at an all time low.
It doesn't matter if the strait is mined or not, because the perception the strait could be mined is enough. It is simply not worth the risk.
Edit: lmao nevermind. 3 ships just tried running the blockade. Emphasis on tried
They don't know if the US is lying or not because trust in the US is at an all time low.
Yup.
I wonder why.
Oh right because the US commander-in-queef is a Russian shill because Russia managed to influence the US enough to make the whole country cognitively challenged through environmental lead (more of an accident than anything purposefully neurotoxic but anyway) and the destruction of the US education system.
Once again posting this chart because when you realize which age group has the most enthusiastic Trump supporters, and you recognize the correlation between their behavior habits and the neuropsychological symptoms of lead poisoning during childhood development, everything starts to make way more sense.
Some of the symptoms include being more prone to anger/rage, which itself inhibits logical, critical thinking. They literally used to spike vehicle fuel with it, dump it in paint, etc.
The study specifically identifies atmospheric lead from additives in gasoline as a substantial source. Which makes sense since the highest incidences coincide with peak leaded gas usage.
Tanker-insurance is impossible to get, now, therefore there simply won't be any ships going through, until that gets remedied.
& it won't get remedied until MUCH more than "an assertion that it's clear" is in-place.
https://shanakaanslemperera.substack.com/p/actuarial-warfare-how-seven-insurance
It's going to be 1/4y MINIMUM before ships begin going through, again, from the looks of that..
maybe closer to a year.
Dominoes got BIG, thanks to the economic-rules underpinning everything in industry..
_ /\ _
What do ya know, consequences. Carpet combing, killing their kids and turning their country into fucking hellscape.
If US politicians ever imposed consequences on rich elites we might have avoided having had to learn the lesson of consequences from Iran.
Prices for everything will increase...again. Thank to the MAGA and Likud fucknuts!
Wars begin when you will, but they do not end when you please. Machiavelli
The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it.
- George Orwell
Please, someone tell me I'm not the only idiot that read this and thought they were trying to do the other type of mining.
The one that doesn't make sense at all, but rather than realising that's not the mining they were doing, because it doesn't make sense. I just got more confused as to what they possibly could have found there worth mining for in the middle of a war.
I have you tagged as Old Fool for some reason. This comment makes that tag extra hilarious.
I know why :)
I see you’re calm since I stayed off your lawn.
Wait, the uNazied States of america government blatantly lied? I'm shocked!!
The convoy idea is so dumb that I can't believe anyone said it out loud. Effective strategy against commerce raiders, which Iran explicitly does not have. Might as well offer to mount a CIWS on tankers and hope your insurance premiums will see it as a wash (they won't). Makes as much sense as suggesting you counter drones with cavalry.
Nice to see the US government still supporting EVs these days.
I still think that EV rebates and tax credits would be more cost efficient and much less jarring than provoking Iran into destroying 20% of the world's oil supply... but I guess that I am too simple-minded for politics.
Trump denied this, and it is extremely unlikely. Iran has the full power to sink every ship that comes close with drones alone, and is why no US navy ship dares come close. The Yemen Houthis have to this day still closed the Red Sea to undesirable traffic, (despite yet another mission accomplished bombing campaign by Trump) and they have less than 1/10th the power of Iran.
Mines would be a sign of loss of control, but more likely the US is bombing small civilian boats under guises that they could lay mines.