this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
383 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

82460 readers
3006 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The second-generation Blade battery can charge from 10-70% in just about five minutes and from 10-97% in under 10 minutes. More impressively, the company showcased the battery charging flawlessly from 20-97% at -22°F (-30°C) in just about 12 minutes, only around three minutes slower than it charges in normal temperatures.

...

The EV was plugged in at 9% state of charge with 93 kilometers of range (57 miles). In 9 minutes and 51 seconds, it charged up to 97% with the range prediction in their gauge cluster displaying 1,008 kilometers (626 miles). This is likely calibrated for the China Light-Duty Test Cycle (CLTC), which tends to be more optimistic than the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) test cycle in the U.S.

Still, these charging speeds are way faster than the 20-40 minute charging stops on the latest EVs in the U.S. The new BYD EVs can basically recharge in nearly the same time it takes to refill a gas car. Even the new 1,500 kilowatt (1.5 megawatt) Flash charging stations are arranged like a traditional gas station for cars to quickly drive in and drive out.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Energy density or GTFO.

I'm tired of articles that purposefully skip the actually important data

[–] Wooki@lemmy.world -1 points 9 hours ago
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I bet they actually have incentives to create better technology.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

chinese companies are often run by engineers not management consultants, lawyers and accountants.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

They also pour money into many hands. Usually their industries are pretty competitive internally. they have more EV car makers than I can remember

[–] Redvenom@retrolemmy.com 42 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Meanwhile ford wants to charge you a monthly fee for the luxury of opening the trunk n you e-mustang

[–] madkins@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't find any information on this. Can you tell me where you read this so I can get more info? I do see they're charging $495 for the plastic tub in the frunk now.

[–] Redvenom@retrolemmy.com 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] dude@lemmings.world 0 points 9 hours ago

The article doesn’t mention a monthly fee though

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

can charge from 10-70% in just about five minutes

Why is that always a metric? Yeah, with a tiny battery or a kilowatt line maybe.

More important is the cycle count.

~~Edit: btw, why don't charging stations have a supercapacitor?~~

[–] lama@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Because the power charging curve is non linear. You have to charge the battery slowly when it's almost depleted or full. So they only post the numbers that make them sound best.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 22 hours ago

Got it. Thanks!

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Cycle count is important for the lifetime estimate on the battery, how long before you have to spend a large portion of the cost of the car on replacing / refurbishing a key component.

"Fill up" time is the most obvious and common 'maintenance' anyone will ever do on their vehicle. One of the biggest objections large swaths of the population have about EVs is/was that could take an hour or more for each stop on a long road trip or if you can't charge at home. (apartment / street parking / etc.) They usually do 10-70%r 80 or whatever because the speed trails off exponentially closer to 100%. (logarithmically? whichever.)

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because discharging 100kw of energy quickly would be dangerous.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 1 day ago (3 children)

China has also implemented the world’s most stringent standards for battery safety. They require automakers to ensure that batteries don't catch fire or explode for at least two hours after a single cell enters thermal runaway. If it does go ablaze, Chinese automakers are experimenting with some unusual ways of protecting the car and occupants from the battery fire.

I like it way more than charging speeds. But also - I'm interested in how many recharge cycles they supposedly can live through, and that's not in the article.

[–] HumbleBragger@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago

The battery life and the cost to replace it is the one million dollars question nobody can answer (yet?) ..I assume that this is why byd cars are cheap giving the amount of technology they ship in the cars..once we have the risk of having to pay loads of money to replace a battery gone or the actual cost to do it, we should see the prices normalized (without the risk discount)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 128 points 2 days ago (9 children)

There is no incentive for US companies to improve their products when they are protected from market forces by import restrictions.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 day ago (6 children)

What US companies? Only three remain (GM, Ford, Tesla) and they make up a fraction of sales here in the US. The Chinese government is dumping truckloads of money into subsidies and development, control nearly all rare earth minerals, and don't shy away from environmental disasters and human rights abuses which is why they're the only nation on the planet that's able to develop this rapidly and sell their vehicles for way less than anyone else on the planet. Once they control everything you can kiss those low prices and rapid development goodbye, but you'll still buy from them because nobody else will be left standing.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If all that is true, then the US should subsidize US ev’s to the point where they are price competitive and open the market to competition where US manufacturers can market against the environmental and human right issues with their Chinese competitors. That would put competitive pressure on Chinese manufacturers to clean up their supply chains and consumers worldwide would benefit.

[–] timwa@lemmy.snowgoons.ro 23 points 1 day ago

The US is battling the environmental and human rights issues that so agitate them about China by promoting 'clean coal' and rounding up brown people in concentration camps without due process.

It's almost as if environmental and human rights issues weren't their real concern 🤔.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

A loss of overall competitiveness of the local companies is actually a well known and studied problem with using tariffs and import restrictions to protects said local companies.

So any competent government which desires for their local companies to survive and prosper will seek different ways to strengthen then which don't suffer from that problem. The Chinese government is doing just that, the US government is not.

By all indications, US politicians are spectacularly incompetent and/or are following a strategy of burning the future of US companies for a short term boost in the money they yield for current CxOs and investors.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Bell@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Charge time sounds great, but what about the number of charge cycles (I.e. longevity), the article did not mention that.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (11 children)

They don't mention it, but I highly suspect its actually not significant.

I used to think fast charging did the same thing, but it turns out that even the heaviest wattage implementations have negligible effects on cycles and health.

As long as your driver is smart enough to control or manipulate the voltage at certain capacities (<15% and >85%), the higher power won't affect the cell quality.

[–] clone_ix@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

You are correct. This is for phones, where it is worse than for EVs, but:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLS5Cg_yNdM

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

so after 1.5 yrs you're at 80% and they're at 93%?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

the new 1,500 kilowatt (1.5 megawatt) Flash charging stations

Must be nice. In Spain the charging infrastructure looks like it's literally designed to torture EV owners.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›