this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2026
363 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

82460 readers
2788 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The second-generation Blade battery can charge from 10-70% in just about five minutes and from 10-97% in under 10 minutes. More impressively, the company showcased the battery charging flawlessly from 20-97% at -22°F (-30°C) in just about 12 minutes, only around three minutes slower than it charges in normal temperatures.

...

The EV was plugged in at 9% state of charge with 93 kilometers of range (57 miles). In 9 minutes and 51 seconds, it charged up to 97% with the range prediction in their gauge cluster displaying 1,008 kilometers (626 miles). This is likely calibrated for the China Light-Duty Test Cycle (CLTC), which tends to be more optimistic than the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) test cycle in the U.S.

Still, these charging speeds are way faster than the 20-40 minute charging stops on the latest EVs in the U.S. The new BYD EVs can basically recharge in nearly the same time it takes to refill a gas car. Even the new 1,500 kilowatt (1.5 megawatt) Flash charging stations are arranged like a traditional gas station for cars to quickly drive in and drive out.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 30 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I bet they actually have incentives to create better technology.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 24 points 10 hours ago

chinese companies are often run by engineers not management consultants, lawyers and accountants.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Those are some impressive numbers but I'm skeptical of anything China claims about their own tech. I don't doubt their battery tech is great but I've seen so many AI/CGI videos of their humanoid robots doing crazy shit and people online are eating it up.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I hear you but it's not like western tech does not outright lie about their specs and/or make up awards to seem better than it is

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Totally fair, you're not wrong

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

can charge from 10-70% in just about five minutes

Why is that always a metric? Yeah, with a tiny battery or a kilowatt line maybe.

More important is the cycle count.

~~Edit: btw, why don't charging stations have a supercapacitor?~~

[–] lama@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Because the power charging curve is non linear. You have to charge the battery slowly when it's almost depleted or full. So they only post the numbers that make them sound best.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Got it. Thanks!

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Cycle count is important for the lifetime estimate on the battery, how long before you have to spend a large portion of the cost of the car on replacing / refurbishing a key component.

"Fill up" time is the most obvious and common 'maintenance' anyone will ever do on their vehicle. One of the biggest objections large swaths of the population have about EVs is/was that could take an hour or more for each stop on a long road trip or if you can't charge at home. (apartment / street parking / etc.) They usually do 10-70%r 80 or whatever because the speed trails off exponentially closer to 100%. (logarithmically? whichever.)

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Because discharging 100kw of energy quickly would be dangerous.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Makes sense. Also still a fat wire needed.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

and an external cooling system because moving that much energy makes heat.

[–] Redvenom@retrolemmy.com 37 points 19 hours ago (7 children)

Meanwhile ford wants to charge you a monthly fee for the luxury of opening the trunk n you e-mustang

[–] madkins@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

I can't find any information on this. Can you tell me where you read this so I can get more info? I do see they're charging $495 for the plastic tub in the frunk now.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

China has also implemented the world’s most stringent standards for battery safety. They require automakers to ensure that batteries don't catch fire or explode for at least two hours after a single cell enters thermal runaway. If it does go ablaze, Chinese automakers are experimenting with some unusual ways of protecting the car and occupants from the battery fire.

I like it way more than charging speeds. But also - I'm interested in how many recharge cycles they supposedly can live through, and that's not in the article.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bell@lemmy.world 18 points 20 hours ago (9 children)

Charge time sounds great, but what about the number of charge cycles (I.e. longevity), the article did not mention that.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›