this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
45 points (84.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38538 readers
1757 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I clarify:

Let's say scientists can't come up with solutions to global problems, AI gets out of control and turns almost everyone into paperclips during wars, and in the 2040s or 2050s, the surviving people (about a few tens of millions around the world or even less) gradually return to the level of intelligence of their distant ancestors?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Let's say scientists can't come up with solutions to global problems

We already have the solution, the French made it in the 1800. We just lack the will to use them again.

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

No I assume they mean the problem of people being stupid assholes.

[–] starlinguk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

In the 18th century, so the 1700s.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would be in the roughly 8 billion dead for sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HorikBrun@kbin.earth 25 points 1 week ago

I mean...the short is answer is "die" almost certainly from unclean water, for at least 60% of the general western population.

[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Well given the extinction of more than a half million essential crop species and the previously universal knowledge of farming that occurred in the last century. Expect to die alongside billions of others.

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 10 points 1 week ago

Our distant ancestors had just as much capacity for learning as we do, they just used it in different ways because that was what the nature of their daily lives demanded. Where we can recognize dozens of brands by their logo alone, they recognized plants by their leaves, useful stones, and scat. Our accumulated knowledge we pass on doesn’t make any one of us any “smarter”. Some of us alive today are not rocket scientists but have the capacity to be, just as there were people thousands of years ago that had that capacity but not the thousands of years of science and engineering that was needed to build on to take that last step and achieve it.

Solitary living is a luxury made easier by the abundance of technology we have, going it alone in a Stone Age state would be very, very difficult, then and now. Folks who understand things like tool making, agriculture, medicinal plant identification, bushcraft, animal husbandry, hunting/fishing/trap making, and clothing making would have a leg up. Those who have all that and the ability to form small cooperative groups would stand an even greater chance of success. I’d also throw out that despite the rise of digital storage, we have a lot, a lot of printed material in the world. Even if we forget how to read, there’s pictures and illustrations. Kids aren’t raised in isolation, knowledge (even diluted knowledge) gets passed on, and we wouldn’t forget where we once were, and the ruins of civilization would be all around. You’d almost need some sort of sci-fi level disease to wipe all of our minds to get us back to true Stone Age levels of living and prevent us from understanding how scavenged tools could be used. We might forget how to forge steel but we’d keep scavenging it for blades rather than revert to stone.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 8 points 1 week ago

I'd become a craftsperson that's for sure, whatever I end up doing will probably be creative manual labor of some kind - pottery for example, but not limited to. It depends on the situation wherever I'm at in the hypothetical moment.

Also, as a side hustle I'd be running something like a DnD table. I'd be on a personal quest to reconstruct the rules, I'll be pretty much asking everyone I meet if they played, what they remember and if they'd be interested in joining my group. I believe with no Internet, tv, or radio, ttrpg would become extremely popular.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I take unbridge with the line

Level of intelligence of their distant ancestors

All evidence so far points to humans being at the same intelligence levels as they are now since basically when we first became Anatomically Modern Humans.

We were not less intelligent, we just had less information and less data.

You can be a Supergenius the likes of which only seen in comic books, but if you don't have the right data and information, you're no different to anyone else.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The only possible answer is that I would eek out an existence foraging for twigs and berries as a neolithic hunter gatherer. However, in my case I would only do that for several months before I died from a chronic health condition I manage with medication, so there's that.

I don't know if it's really possible for us to go back to the stone age. There's so much steel and iron lying around. I don't really know much about metallurgy but I'm pretty sure I could figure out how to flatten some rebar into a blade if it was all I had to do all day.

We also have domesticated breeds of livestock and know how to raise crops.

So, at worst it would be some kind of modern iron age, neolithic isn't really possible.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

In the novel Star's Reach, in a post-collapse society, one of the main characters is a 'miner.' Their mining guild basically tears apart old concrete buildings, by hand, with sledge hammers to extract the old rebar from them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

The world can support less than 1% of its current population if everyone reverted to a neolithic lifestyle. And countless species would be hunted to extinction during the collapse.

So in short, the answer to what I would do? Like nearly everyone else, just die. The folks from Sentinel Island will inherit the Earth.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What would I do? Probably flee the settlements and take my chances as a swamp shaman.

[–] deadymouse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And you will bewitch people with herbs or science?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] emotional_soup_88@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Reinvent myself. Take no shit. Get a girl and be happy. Also, die at the age of 32.

[–] myrmidex@belgae.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The evolution of menopause and the mathematical impossibility of population growth are two gaping holes in the hypothesis that Paleolithic humans died at 25. Available data from modern hunter-gatherer societies also contradict the hypothesis that prehistoric humans all died very young: members of these groups who live to reach puberty have life expectancies between 60 and 70 years.

https://paleoleap.com/why-cavemen-didnt-die-young/

[–] socsa@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'd probably just jerk off again tbh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] naught101@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

OP said neolithic! You going to forge some rocks?

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Fair point. I guess I will try to invent blacksmithing.

(not that I think a return to the neolithic is a likely scenario - some knowledge will stick around, regardless of how far we fall in population, resources, and technology)

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

The world would be littered with metal sitting around, rusting away. I don't see why bruh couldn't build a kiln, strap a hammer, and make shit.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago

mad max world is probably likely, or a 4400 type of civilization, where the rich are in thier bougie clean enclaves, while everyone is the devastate mad max style living.

[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can cook over a wood fire and teach others the same. I can do carpentry with un-powered hand tools to an acceptable level. I am a pretty decent archer. Hopefully I could find a group of survivors who valued those skills over my delicious flesh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

pretty sure im not going to be in the survival group.

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All the people saying, "I'd just die," remember that neolithic peoples (hell, all people up to the present day) rely on social bonds. You don't have to possess every survival skill, just enough skills to be an asset to a community of mutual-support.

I already educate children, and regardless of society's form I'd probably continue to do so because it's vitally important. Also as someone well-practiced in a variety of handicrafts, I suspect I'd find my niche quite comfortably. Making useful things from limited resources, teaching others how to make such things, and teaching children the knowledge I've accumulated throughout my life, I think there's bound to be a place in a stone age community for someone like me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The level of intelligence in the Neolithic was exactly the same as today. The level of science is the difference. And the only way to go back to the Neolithic is to erase all knowledge and all memories.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] XiELEd@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Return to the level of intelligence? I think we just won't be able to sustain the sophisticated complexity of our current systems in addition to the death of skilled professionals. Honestly, my only hope is in the book I have printed called How To Invent Everything and my other books about farming, food processing and weaving, then make the technologies that we can create and sustain for the betterment of any community that I find or adopts me. Then become a cult leader idk

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well I wouldn't have much choice in the matter. I would most definitely die.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

UGG RELY ON DIVERSIFIED MUTUAL FUNDS FOR LIQUIDITY. BIG ROCK FOR SOFA.

[–] thinkercharmercoderfarmer@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For all y'all on here saying you have no survival skills: computers and electronics aren't going to just go away, and the fact that you're having this conversation on a federated internet forum means you know at least a little bit more about computers than your average bear. For any scenario where extinction is a possibility, being able to operate a computer and use it to communicate with other humans would be a huge asset, and the more of those people we have around the easier it'll be to keep it going when things go to hell. Don't sell yourself short.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I don’t see us regressing before 1820. Will just be back to your horses, carriages, and living off the land.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 2 points 1 week ago

So many depressed people on Lemmy, everyone just going with dying huh?

I mean I am excited to finally flex my creativity, see if there is anything I can figure out how to do with all our crap and the new world. Maybe some kind of silly The Grinch level home full of housing code violations and crazy contraptions made of garbage while I cross breed pea/beans.

It would be cool if when I die people thought of me as some weird hermit alchemist and as they wander through my house finding tools of the old world uncover a lost truth and then some YA type shit happens as a result.

Dying is easy, we all do it eventually, the question is, if you do anything before you get to the same finish line.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Oh shit, sorry honey- I have to go hunting and fishing again all week.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

As we can see from what is happening in the world today my answer is nothing. We will do nothing and just accept our fate.

load more comments
view more: next ›