this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
1019 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

82329 readers
3865 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] twjolson@lemmy.world 184 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Only one team working to make Teams worse???

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 93 points 5 days ago (2 children)

They have achieved higher productivity by not using teams themselves.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 54 points 5 days ago

You've got it reversed. Switching to Teams greatly hastened development, as the team's newfound vitriol and frustration could be channeled toward the end user in a neverending feedback loop.

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 13 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Literally! They were told to return to office to achieve higher productivity (it was circling the news around September?)

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It was obviously just a corpo stealth layoff but imagine being told as a Teams developer that Teams is not good enough for remote work

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 66 points 4 days ago (6 children)

I swear people do not understand the point of what microsoft does.

There isn't a team tasked with making teams worse. They're tasked with extracting all possible value out of their product. Part of that value is infromation like where you are, what you're doing, what you're talking about, what you search for, what you actually do for your job, who is around you, what they talk about, where they are, what they are doing, what they search for, and what they do for their job and how everyone spends their money.

All of this is incredibly valuable data to governments, businesses and private individuals that want to advertise, suppress dissenting political voices, enhance useful dissenting political voices, and otherwise manipulate global influence.

They just don't want you to think about declining any permissions, triggering regulatory action, or switching to another platform.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That's true. Their mission is not explicitly to make it worse, but to continually maximize value at all costs. Eventually, software usability has to be one of the costs.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lasta@piefed.world 119 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (9 children)

This is what I gathered on the subject, feel free to correct if anything is wrong:

The WiFi tracking works by scanning for nearby WiFi networks, identifying which routers are nearby and their signal strengths, matching those against their database of known WiFi access points, and using that data to estimate your location. 

For now the feature will be off by default, first has to be enabled by your company, and then the user has to opt in for it to be used.

For those who are required to use Microsoft products, it can by bypassed by using a wired Ethernet connection and not using Teams on any devices using a wireless connection.

Edit: As @lividweasel@lemmy.world pointed out, Microsoft is not using WiFi positioning systems to determine location, but rather updating your location to “in the office” or not depending on whether your device is connected to one of the organization’s WiFi SSIDs.

[–] nullPointer@programming.dev 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

same go for the web browser based teams, or is this just the "app"?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 46 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The browser version shouldn't be able to access this info.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Until Edge updates and silently turns it on

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] lumettaria@sopuli.xyz 95 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"Tenant admins will decide whether to enable it and require end-users to opt-in."

If you require someone to opt-in, they're no longer "opting in"

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago

But you clicked the terms and conditions popup, so you are our slave now.

[–] BigTurkeyLove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 73 points 5 days ago (4 children)

So glad I only use Teams in a browser, fuck this bullshit.

Don't install Teams.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 68 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Teams comes pre installed with windows these days.

I recommend KDE Plasma on any linux distribution that comes with it for people interested in recovering their digital sovereignty.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (3 children)

If people moved to Linux and used FOSS software, these privacy violations wouldn't even be a problem.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 40 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Most people who use teams do so on work devices, I can't just install Linux on it.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

I cant even delete a shortcut on my work microslop machine

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 21 points 5 days ago (3 children)

If people moved to Linux

When users connect to their organization's WiFi...

You think my employer would let me use Linux? Creeping on employees is how management feels important.

I wouldn't use Teams personally unless under extreme duress. Unfortunately professionally it is the norm.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago

Disable your laptop webcam and microphone, use headset instead. I'll be looking to see if I can switch to Teams web.

I remember how a subcontractor's company called me with a lot of private information I assume the subcontractor had spoken to them about. The subcontractor had no clue about it, which completely changed how I had been perceiving the situation. The problem is companies are using the excuse of keeping tabs on their workers to perform outright continuous surveillance on them and try to see how they can exploit any and all information they can salvage for their benefit, which becomes a problem when there is no clear division between personal and professional space.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You can't even install it on Linux, they killed the native app years ago and now tell you to use the browser version

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 43 points 4 days ago (1 children)

God damn it, at work they pay us to put that stuff on our personal phones... maybe I've been a bit too lenient on that, maybe I should get a work phone.

[–] Enekk@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Never, ever, cross the personal/work barrier. I have seen so much abuse when those lines cross.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I agree, but some places there's simply no option. I have a state job, they will under no circumstances provide a phone, but you must have Authenticator. If you won't or can't use a smartphone, you simply don't have a job.

State jobs are interesting. 3/4 the pay of a regular job, but job security like none other, and you barely have to do anything. I spend most of my time doing my moonlighting job to supplement my income.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 41 points 5 days ago

This is illegal in Norway :)

[–] Fokeu@lemmy.zip 30 points 4 days ago

They've crossed the line a long long time ago. All microslop products are straight up unusable.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Microsoft: Our product is not our software. It's you!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I worked on a large(ish) contract (tens of millions) with one of Microsoft’s engineering teams where they were implementing an Azure managed version of software we produced. I would regularly refuse to install teams at the meetings, using teams in-browser only.

It also ensured that the technical project manager had to be the one to transcribe anything in our notes into whatever tools Microsoft was using.

While it was never said, the Microsoft engineers seemed to completely understand and never pushed back against my refusal to a) install crapware and b) not take on work that wasn’t mine.

Not using teams: win win.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (7 children)

I would regularly refuse to install teams at the meetings, using teams in-browser only.

I tried to do this for a safety meeting, Teams is also broken in browsers. I'm not sure if intentional or incompetence.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if the team that is tasked with making teams worse has team meetings with the whole team on teams.

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Yesterday I read on here that Microsoft doesn't let their teams use Teams.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 24 points 4 days ago

My employer has the usual setup of M365 enterprise shit running on Dell laptops.

Fortunately we devs are able to "dual boot" to run Linux on our machines, since our product is an embedded Linux system. (has anybody seen my Windows partition btw? I can't even find anything NTFS formatted, whoopsie!)

All that background info is just so I can pay Microsoft a compliment, even if it has asterisks all over it:

The entire Microsoft suite works just fine in a browser, and in LibreWolf too! I do typically add some permissions for those sites for convenience, since librewolf is privacy/tracking hardened (firefox fork) out of the box. I use Teams and Outlook every day, and occasionally will drop a file into OneDrive or edit something in MS Office. I don't write many office-format documents though, so I'm more likely to be in LibreOffice or a PDF viewer just reading a doc.

You know how in media streaming and gaming there's that balance of whether it is more convenient to be a paying customer versus pirate everything?

Microsoft's stuff is literally better to use in Linux. Even if I need to test the Windows build of something, a VM is SO much more convenient. And I'm not even logged into the microsoft shit on that. If I need something from OneDrive, I go to the browser there too.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The users aren't the customers. The customers are the users' bosses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 35 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Having Teams remind you that, during session recordings, your video and what you say can be used by Microsoft for whatever purpose they want, including (but not limited to) training AI.

This wasn't the line that was crossed? Seeing/hearing your likeness in the next generated AI / copilot commercial, because you needed to consent in order to work. This is "fine" /s

... but having Microsoft know that you're answering Teams messages while on the toilet... yeah, that's where "the line gets crossed" (eyeroll)

We need to wake-up and drop this technological cancer.

edit: a word

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Employees arent the ones paying for Teams, so why would they care? Teams could openly market itself as remote work surveillance tool for employers and they'd gobble that shit up.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] dansel@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (3 children)

You’re doubting Microsoft’s ability to make a product worse?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Honestly, I would screen potential employers by whether they are a Microsoft shop or not. Fuck ‘em.

[–] cole@lemdro.id 28 points 5 days ago

nice to have that sort of freedom, since the majority of companies use some Microsoft products

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 21 points 5 days ago

They are called stakeholders.

[–] TimeNaan@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 days ago

There have been teams at Microsoft making everything worse since 1998. Why is this news?

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago

This feel like 1 office shooting away from a huge settlement....

[–] Solrac@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

And is why we don't use Microsoft products.

[–] masta_chief@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I was gonna use teams for a few groups of people, but fuck this noise. What are the best alternatives? Something like slack or discord but those have their issues too

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

Probably the same pick me they put in charge of Xbox.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

So many other apps do this already, including the OS. This is changing your Teams status for you, so coworkers can see if you’re in the office or not.

If your hybrid wfh office has any sort of reservation system then this is likely already happening.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 8 points 4 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›