this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
352 points (99.2% liked)

News

36063 readers
3048 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Greenland does not need medical assistance from other countries, Denmark has said, after Donald Trump said he was sending a hospital ship to the autonomous Danish territory that he wants to acquire.

“The Greenlandic population receives the healthcare it needs. They receive it either in Greenland, or, if they require specialised treatment, they receive it in Denmark. So it’s not as if there’s a need for a special healthcare initiative in Greenland,” the country’s defence minister, Troels Lund Poulsen, told the Danish broadcaster DR on Sunday.

In Greenland, as in Denmark, access to healthcare is free. There are five regional hospitals across the vast Arctic island, with the Nuuk hospital serving patients from all over the territory.

Mette Frederiksen, the Danish prime minister, defended Denmark’s healthcare system, writing on Facebook that she was “happy to live in a country where there is free and equal access to health for all. Where it’s not insurances and wealth that determine whether you get proper treatment.”

“You have the same approach in Greenland,” she said, before adding: “Happy Sunday to you all” in front of a blushing, smiling emoji.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If he sent a hospital boat to any city in the US, it would fill up with needy Americans

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

He’d probably make sure all Americans pay up front for any health care they receive this way…

[–] lonefighter@sh.itjust.works 94 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ironically, if Greenland ever did become part of the US all those people that Trump is pretending to care about will instantly lose free or even affordable healthcare.

Why is Trump sending free healthcare to other countries while US citizens are dying of easily preventable illnesses because they can't afford medical care? I thought he was all about America first?/s

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump sending the hospital ship to Greenland, sending $10B to the Board of Peace...he's such a giving person when it's our money. When it is his own? Not so much...

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't forget that he gave $40 Billion to Argentina in the middle of a government shutdown where we had stopped giving food to our own poor citizens.

[–] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I didnt wake up ready to be filled with rage, but here I am.

[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Welcome to the fediverse!

[–] madde@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why you guys in the US are not running around with pitchforks and torches is still unbelievable to me...

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The militarized police force probably has something to do with it...

[–] lolrightythen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If not the ghoulish pigs, at least 1/3 of my neighbors would probably jump at the chance for some patriotic violence.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah, a lot of people don't realize how deeply unstable a lot of "ordinary americans" really are.

For a long time they thought it was a land of progress because of what was essentially just effective marketing. A well-managed PR department and tight control of the public narrative.

A lot of people with fascistic tendencies weren't really on the internet until around when trump entered politics. Then all these right-wing grifters started popping up and radicalizing large swaths of people.

Before then, people thought America was sane. It wasn't, the insane people just kept to themselves for the most part. That's the only thing that's changed, really...

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's hilarious. "You know what those Danish citizens need? American healthcare!" Who comes up with this stuff?

Also,

writing that she was "happy to live in a country where there is free and equal access to health for all. Where it’s not insurances and wealth that determine whether you get proper treatment."

I would love to have a head of state as competent and sensible as her!

[–] bender223@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

exactly. this is the most hilariously dumb idea ever 🤦‍♂️

[–] Nickelalloy@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now i am pretty sure Denmark has no hospital ship but imagine if they would send hospital ship to the US with free healthcare.

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Maersk has the opportunity to help the Danish government do the funniest thing

Edit: the more I think about this the more I wish they would, but it'd probably take 3 years and cost half a billion euro to bring a new hospital ship online. I wonder if they could borrow one from somebody. Fill it with European medical staff, send it to Corpus Christi. Start treating us like the developing nation we are.

[–] KaladinStormblessed@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Corpus Christi reference on Lemmy?!

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Honestly it's where I'd send it if I was doing a propaganda op. It's a show of Danish excess capacity, it makes sense to target it at an area that supports Trump. You could do New York I guess, but Mamdani being mayor muddies the optics. Corpus Christi is like a top ten conservative city, it's a port, and it's got a ton of people who are underserved. CC is perfect. Roll up with 1000 beds and offer free medical care at a Danish standard, more or less, and start publishing people's stories about how they can't get basic care.

Kinda like the Vulcan Bridge. If you embarrass the hell out of Uncle Sam he'll eventually do the right thing.

[–] Fokeu@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago

Trojan horse type shit

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 59 points 1 day ago

this is because apparently the other day Denmark provided medical aid to a US Navy Submarine.

I shit you not. this is Trumps response to that.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The skeptic in me says its a trojan horse and is a covert military ship to posture more assets in the area.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Seriously. And if Denmark did anything to intercept it, he could use that as casus belli to start a war. Remember the USS Maine? Of To Hell with Spain, Remember the Maine? Seizing or sinking a hospital ship is still an attack against a US Navy vessel, and it would be played in the media as an act of utter barbarity.

On the other hand, the ship could be used as a tool for war even if Denmark lets it dock. How hard do you think it would be for the CIA to arrange some false-flag or instigated terrorist attack against the hospital ship? Imagine if the hospital ship is docked and stormed by a bunch of armed gunmen, dubbed in the media as "radical Danish nationalists." The US could then use that as justification to start "anti-terrorism activities," which gradually grow into an outright occupation of the island. No clean formal start to war that would serve as as source of international outrage and could fracture NATO like a gunshot. The US already has large military presence in Greenland, but this would represent a massive expansion of that. And, over time, an ever-increasing US military presence and control over civilian areas. Think less Spanish American War and more of how Russia slowly occupied vast areas of Eastern Ukraine in the years before the breakout of the major overt war.

[–] 2hundredpancakes@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Greatest country on earth" moment. What could we possibly give Greenland that they don't already have? Measles??

Meanwhile the leading cause of bankruptcy here is medical debt 👍

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Send that medical aid boat to USA, they need the help more.

We can't afford it.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's how they are gonna take over Greenland;

give them free medical supplies* ^shipping,handling,dispensing,and^ ^all^ ^the^ ^other^ ^insane^ ^fees^ ^not^ ^included^

bill them

Now American bank owns Greenland!

[–] chuck@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If china wants to piss of the orange guy they should float medical shisp to the major cities with ports and advertise no charge health services and see the hospitals reee with anger about lost sales

Reminds me of the American town that asked the Soviets for funding during the Cold War. There was a town that was essentially cut off without a bridge, and the local American government was dragging their feet with funding the construction. The town sent a letter to the USSR asking for humanitarian aid, who happily agreed to fund the bridge as a giant “fuck you” to the Americans. Suddenly, the American government was more than happy to fund the bridge as soon as the “USSR sending money to the US because America can’t afford to build their own bridges” news headlines broke and they had egg on their face.

[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Damn that would be hilarious. It could absolutely turn into a no-win scenario for the orange clown. Turn away free healthcare by running the ships out of town or let them stay and piss off the American healthcare operators?

We all know which option he’d choose. He’d have a lot more friends running the system than stuck inside of it.

That would honestly be hilarious and rhetorically effective

[–] neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Meanwhile my 1 year old has a pretty routine surgery scheduled for next month that will cost me close to $30k after insurance.

[–] madde@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

Consider a vacation in Greenland then maybe?

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You understood all wrong! The ship is sailing not to provide help. It sails to receive help.

:)

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They can't. That's the reason why they send ship to Greenland.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think others should subsidise American healthcare. We pay for our healthcare via taxes, it's not right for the Americans to mooch off of that.

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

Trump: You pathetic communo-socialists! Your civilization is crumbling! 20% tariffs! No, 25! No, 23! Yes, 21! Covfefe! Arghg-hg-hg, pffffft...

it's a fucking trojan horse

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So that hospital boat will turn around to serve americans in american coastal cities right? Right???

lol, top notch joke

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I am legitimately wondering if Trump would be stupid enough to do this. I'm sure it would violate all kinds of conventions, and would ensure no US ship would ever dock anywhere ever again, but at the same time I don't think that would stop him.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm sure it would violate all kinds of conventions

Correct.

and would ensure no US ship would ever dock anywhere ever again

Unfortunately extremely unlikely, given the current world order of the US being effectively exempt from all rules and most consequences.

I'm not saying there wouldn't be SOME consequence, but it would be nowhere near as robust as that..

[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Agreed on all points. As much as I'd love to think this would instantly isolate them, that's even beyond wishful thinking.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As if anyone in Greenland would want the substandard American healthcare, particularly with Mr. Brain-worm toilet-licker in charge of things now. Anyone visiting that ship is more likely to come away with some new disease like measles and a prescription to horse dewormer than they are actual healthcare. Greenland should put up a giant quarantine zone around the ship.

[–] leavenotrace@feddit.nu 1 points 1 day ago

There are tons of issues with healthcare in the US, but quality of care isn't one of them. Go to any major hospital in the US and you'll receive world-class treatment, you'll just most likely spend years paying it off.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Sink it. 'Accidentally', of course...

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

"Have you seen the prices on that boat?" - Every European with a national health service