this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
591 points (97.9% liked)

Political Memes

11255 readers
909 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 107 points 1 week ago (1 children)

lets wait and see.

100% andrew is scum and should be in prison.

but they had decades of accusations and reports. our govt only gave a shit once it was revealed the state was the “victim”. They immediately arrested him.

lock him up, throw away the key.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Decades to gather the will to act.

Seconds to start lording their superiority over the US.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 76 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

He wasn't arrested for the pedo stuff, pretty sure it was state secrets.

[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He was still arrested though and not, to pick a completely random example, elected president for a second time when no one had an excuse not to know what a massive cunt he was.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

No. However in the UK, unsure about other countries, whatever they find during the searches they are doing today will bring other charges in the future (if serious enough).

If there's an inkling of paedo stuff at all then they'll rearrest and charge him again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LaserTurboShark69@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My understanding is that they got him on sharing trade secrets

[–] pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Exactly, nothing related to the sexual abuse and exploitation of children.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The will to act is related to the sex allegations.

They’ll pin the charges on him that they’re best prepared for.

Either way, it’s related.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's about to find out like King Richard II, that it definitely is possible for a Royal to commit treason

[–] Vile_port_aloo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But he's so silver-tongued and charismatic...

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

About as appealing as an infected toe.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

South Korea: That's how you deal with a wannabe dictator!

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago

Probably just wanted to make him sweat

For those who don't remember, he claimed that he couldn't sweat

[–] Womble@piefed.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Thats normal procedure for non-violent crimes (this wasnt about rape/abuse/trafficing), arrest them, interview them, release on bail while they go through all the material they took in the search while he was in the nick.

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It would be if that was the reason they arrested him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, it's not being a massive nonce they got him for. It was leaking information.

Which is presumably why Epstein let him fly in and have a go on his girl collection in the first place.

We're hitting the point where fucking the kids is OK, but paying for it isn't.

[–] Damorte@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Yeah he's not convicted for fucking kids, he's convicted for fucking money. Which of course is a much worse crime as far as our owners are concerned

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

And South Korea could teach us how to deal with insurrectionists

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wait until they are old, only do something out of fear of otherwise worse consequences, and even then never even prosecute the right stuff, give them a slap on the wrists never dismantling the precesses that lead to the problem?

Yeah, idk, I keep hoping for better, but we kinda keep "giving" rich ppl more & more power, so idk why would things suddenly, magically improve.

A bit like

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Did I miss something? The UK arrested his one?

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, but not for the pedo stuff

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

It's still how you deal with a paedo like him, yes?

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah they arrested Andrew~~s~~

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Just Andrew, Andrews is a treasure and, as far as I know, has not been implicated in the files.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

I was looking for exactly this meme when I read that South Korea sentenced their ex-president to life in prison.

[–] mickus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hardly. They waited so god damn long to investigate. The first photo andrew had with that girl should have been reason enough to put him in for questioning

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For what? She wasn’t underaged. The photo wasn’t evidence of a crime.

[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More than enough grounds for suspicion based on the context

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The bar for arrest is much higher than that.

[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago

Crouching over an unconscious woman/girl in a pedophile's mansion? Seems like if that doesn't meet the bar, it really should.

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

*rapist

Judge people for their actions, not how they were born

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Agreed, it can essentially be an ableist term for those which actively fight against this illness to have a chance at a normal life.

Everyone celebrating before the trial has even began, as if it’s already done

[–] Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fr👍🥳🥳🥳🥳

[–] RelativeArea1@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

uhhhh... i dont know rick, this feels like its just being done to protect their status quo and that bitchass ends up in a fancy ass house arrest or smth.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The rapist formerly known as prince...

Edit: Don't hate on me, I realize he wasn't arrested for that, but still, who knows what all information is left to unearth in the files...

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Didn't they let him go ten minutes later?

load more comments
view more: next ›