this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
1094 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

81208 readers
4560 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has criticized the European Union’s intentions to achieve digital sovereignty through open-source software. The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness. According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, warned of a competitive paradox that Europe is facing. According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement. His remarks came just days after the European Commission concluded a public consultation assessing the transition to open-source software.

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.” Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

The EU is preparing a technological sovereignty package aimed at eliminating dependence on third-party software, such as Google’s. After reviewing proposals, it concluded that reliance on external suppliers for critical infrastructure entails economic risks and creates vulnerabilities. The strategy focuses not only on regulation but also on adopting open-source software to achieve digital sovereignty.

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users. Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.” As it did with the DMA and other laws, Google is playing on fear. Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

The promotion of open-source software aims to break dependence on foreign suppliers, especially during a period of instability caused by the Trump administration. The European Union has highlighted the risks of continuing under this system and proposes that public institutions should have full control over their own technology.

According to a study on the impact of open-source software, the European Commission found that it contributes between €65 billion and €95 billion annually to the European Union’s GDP. The executive body estimates that a 10% increase in contributions to open-source software would generate an additional €100 billion in growth for the bloc’s economy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Not good for whose growth? Because it'll be perfectly fine for eu. The fact that google is upset about this, should be all the tell you need to know you're on the right path.

[–] C1pher@lemmy.world 24 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 3 points 43 minutes ago

It's worth saying again: Google can fuck itself.

And I generally like Google's products. But they make plenty of money off of my data to say: Fuck Google.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 19 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Tough shit, you supported the MAGA movement and Europe, thankfully, reacted accordingly. Simply put, the good folks in the EU lost faith in the USA.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 42 minutes ago

The good folks in the USA have lost faith in the USA. Alas, the bad folks remain in power. heh

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

If Europe cares about climate change they will force carriers to open source their firmware. Why should a phone be allowed to be non-updateable?

[–] firepenny@lemmy.world 2 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 52 minutes ago)

Who will think of the shareholders? /s

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 2 points 57 minutes ago

google can get bent

[–] Yttra@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Huh, I wonder how this economic growth compares to Google's multiple mass layoffs over the past few years...

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Google knows it's place is slowly fading away the more people realize how much harm they do.

[–] Itwasntme223@discuss.online 12 points 2 hours ago

Google is secretly panicking cause they lost an entire nation bloc. That's gotta hurt the pocket book somewhere.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 57 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Funny considering how much of Google was built on open software.

[–] arc99@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. Open source is fine when it suits them but not fine when it doesn't.

[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

This is why GNU GPL is very importand.

Here the GNU GPL comes to the rescue. The programmer shows the boss that this proprietary software product would be copyright infringement, and the boss realizes that he has only two choices: release the new code as free software, or not at all. Almost always he lets the programmer do as he intended all along, and the code goes into the next release. ref

[–] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 38 points 3 hours ago

Car company complains that city is developing Metro system.

[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Oh yes, bring it on!!

[–] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.”

goog chief legal just being an edgelord while undermining some small things like uhhh... goog being under beck and call of an orange baby.

he didn't really define what's "best technologies" are -- in the world.

we can say COBOL is still alive because it is the "best technology" at what it can do.

It seems to me that his advice is sound, and that the eu is following it. Google is just not the best technologies in the world, and hadn't been for a long while.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 5 hours ago

More desperate pleas by Google. I just saw an article by some Google shill that made a case against self hosting. Next they'll try to make it illegal.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 85 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

MoRe OpTiOnS iS bAd FoR cOmPeTiTiOn

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

competition is bad for competition

checks out

translation: having more competitors harms our chance of winning against them

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 54 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I'm not sure why anyone in EU, bloc or therefore canada should even care what an American company opinion would be at this point. They said they were moving on. They did.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 32 points 7 hours ago

How DARE they try to ELIMINATE our Services after ALL the MONEY we Poured in Donald Trump's POCKETS!

[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world 56 points 8 hours ago

The leopard of consequences is hungry for tech oligarch faces.

Eat, you majestic creature. And godspeed.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 66 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Remember, whenever you see a patently weak argument like this from a trillion dollar corporation, they’re not saying it because they think anyone will believe it. They’re saying it to give the corrupt politicians in their pocket some way to pull a straight face when voting in the corporation’s favour.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 6 points 7 hours ago

We saw already tech paying off the US to bully europe into backing off of their previous demands and controls on tech. Europe has bad leadership, they backed off, and surrendered all last year to the US administration, there is no reason to think they won't this time after google pays them off to do it again.

Europe is too busy trying to bring in the trojan horses of age checks and chatcontrol behind the gates to worry about protecting from tech, but rather to cooperate with tech to subjugate their citizens to secret social scores to determine winners and losers in life, with peter thiel and his ilk doing the deciding. The UK is already most of the way there, and the rest of europe is trying to follow, over and over and over. They only need to win once, the defenders of liberal democracy need to win every time.

Europe needs real leadership pushing popular reform. They will fall to fascists in league with the US that will fix their elections too on their current course of status quo mainstream politics with the far right as the only real reform option.

We give them reform, or nazis will, those are the only two choices, and the starmers and macrons of the world still don't know it or don't care.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 15 points 7 hours ago

What a preposterous argument google is making. Yes it stifles innovation having open source software and not licensing it from the soul-less mega corporation with the US government willing to break kneecaps for it (if they pay up,) that we know helps the US steal information, and themselves steals every big of information they can get their grasping hands on, both legally and illegally.

Yes Europe wouldn't have the best tools, if they weren't beholden to a mega corporation that could use the out of control drunk with power US to back up their market interests! Talk about an incredible argument. We will see, I bet europe caves to US pressure, as they did all last year, and just goes along with tech plans to bring the trojan horses of chatcontrol and age checks inside the walls of liberal democracies, to ultimately make secret social scores to determine every part of how a person is treated from business to government. Those decisions made by the worst people in the world like Palantir in cooperation with politicians.

As to keeping data in europe so the us couldn't access it, ha. What were you born yesterday? Google is beholden to the US that can make or break them in a thousand million ways. They will find a way, (they already have,) to grab all the data, stored in europe or whereever. You know it, same way we knew before snowden the feds were grabbing everything they could get their grasping hands on.

Because who is going to stop them?

[–] cv_octavio@piefed.ca 12 points 7 hours ago

So, you're saying Google has selection bias?

[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

Não estava nada à espera de ver um artigo da Pplware nesta comunidade

[–] aqua@lemmy.zip 41 points 9 hours ago

really fun fuck you google

[–] xeekei@lemmy.zip 64 points 10 hours ago

Fuck you, Google.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 71 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Wrong.

creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement

Wrong.

Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms

What does he not understand about digital sovereignty?

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users

No, for Google. Also, wrong.

that the market moves faster than legislation and warns, that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.”

If that's the price to avoid technofaschism... And, again, wrong.

Tl;dr: stop wanking, Walker.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 19 points 9 hours ago

This is good. It means that the efforts are working and Google is getting nervous. Let them get nervous and let’s give them a lot more to be nervous about.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 17 points 9 hours ago

"Buy my shovel! Don't buy that other guys shovel!" Ah, capitalism, you crazy old whore.

[–] pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip 32 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

What happened to: "Google ❤️ open source"

[–] hector@lemmy.today 11 points 7 hours ago

I think it's buried the same place they put the do no evil slogan. No body no crime as they say.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›