this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
568 points (99.7% liked)

politics

28198 readers
2592 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The GOP’s sweeping new anti-voting bill cleared the U.S. House Wednesday, setting up a high-stakes battle in the Senate.

The House voted 218-213 to pass the SAVE America Act, which experts have said could disenfranchise millions by requiring voters to show documentary proof of citizenship at registration and to provide photo ID when they cast ballots.

Republicans have argued for voter ID broadly, pointing out that there isn’t much to prevent a noncitizen from casting a ballot in a federal election — besides the fact that it’s a felony, easily caught, and would lead to deportation all for the chance to cast one out of hundreds of thousands of votes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

This season of House of Cards is thrilling!

grabs popcorn

oh wait, I'm living inside the tv show... 🫠

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago

Well done american voters! And a special shoutout to all the sitouts who stood idly by and let a fascist child rapist in on their watch.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 29 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

When the fuck do we just start killing politicians and billionaires? Seriously. Why are we still pretending like laws mean anything in this fucking country?

[–] MarcPG@lemmy.zip 9 points 8 hours ago

They most certainly killed a lot of people too. If not directly, then indirectly. Don’t see anything wrong with returning the favor

[–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 16 points 11 hours ago

Imagine if all those school & mass shooters instead chose corrupt politicians and billionaires...

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

Luigi showed us the way.

[–] frtzngbllr@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

MORE killing is never the answer. Did you know that there were really... effective "instruments" in the old ages?

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

GOP is scared. They know, short of gestapo-like tactics this November, their days are numbered.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Sucks that they're capable of gestapo type tactics, then.

[–] Sektor@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

It's not what they're capable of, it's what they are able to do without repercussions. When there is no penalty people can do very bad things, like in war.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago

Married women can't vote because the names don't match.

This will skate through the Senate. Elections in the USA won't mean shit after this.

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 18 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

And wtf can be used as "proof of citizenship"

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

Some paper you lost 30 years ago

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 25 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Here we go. This is how they're going to further oppress the opposition and keep the regime in power. Anything to keep Trump from paying for his crimes.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

The alternative was a woman! Of color!

/s for the fucking halfwits

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works -3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

The db0 shitters wanted this. The ml shitters wanted this.

They want an excuse to see fires and blood. They want an excuse for violence. And they'll throw everyone else vulnerable into harms way first to get their shot at an imaginary revolution. They play the disinformation game to get their own way.

Don't trust them. Don't believe them.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

OK 3-day old user with 1 comment and with suspiciously deep knowledge of the fediverse meta

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Some yes, those whose only political view is "America bad", and doesn't think about the potential fallout of the US disappearing from the world.

When the Soviet Union fell apart, the USA and EU filled its place for the most part.

If the USA falls apart, get ready for traditional Chinese medicine and faux gay conversion therapies pushed by Russia to get mainstreamed by the WHO.

I can understand if someone, to reduce harm, voted (or will vote) for Kamala Harris. Sometimes I even think that would have been the obvious choice, but she and Biden didn't do the obvious of arresting diddler Don. I cannot really think the same with Gavin Newsom.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 65 points 23 hours ago (17 children)

To everyone saying people needed to wait until the mid-terms to take action: Fuck You.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 84 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Last election several individuals committed voter AND election fraud. They were all Republicans.

Let’s see ‘em in the comments if you’re inclined to display them.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 156 points 1 day ago (8 children)

This mandates government registration to access an essential right of a citizen in a democracy. Ask for the same thing for gun ownership though and the right would lose their minds.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 93 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What’s interesting, is that many of us already do register with the state governments.

Its goal isn’t to regulate voting. It’s to suppress it.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Yep. Very easy to disenfranchise many people this way.

Particularly, anyone whose name or SAAB on their passport or birth certificate doesn't match their photo id. Anyone who works during DMV hours and can't take time off to renew an ID. Especially those who don't drive (and thus don't need a license).

So let's see, that's mainly women, genderqueer, and the working poor. Alright alright.

Who else?

I'm sure that a lot of the unhoused don't have easy access to their birth certificate or passport.

Anybody who cut ties with their parents and can't access this paperwork. So no strong family values.

Oh yeah. The millions of Americans who can't even dream of leaving the country who never even got a passport in the first place.

How is this not a poll tax?

And I'm gonna guess that this is going to make mail in voting more difficult? Or perhaps we will have to verify our ID with an app, this getting all of our info while also removing anonymity from voting, at a time when one party is not just hostile, but downright violent towards members of the other.

How about this...the republicans get to have a poll tax if the Democrats get to have a literacy test. If we are gonna make voting harder, lets make it harder for both sides. Deal?

Obviously that's quite tongue in cheek.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The goal here is to keep women from voting: the SAVE act very specifically requires that you

  • Prove citizenship
  • That you prove that the name on your citizenship document (eg: birth certificate) match your current name

Because women often change name when they get married, they'll have a mismatch, and need to spend time and money to be able to vote. If the legislation passes, it will block about 20 million Americans from voting. Because of gender disparities in voting, Republicans see this as to their advantage.

Give your Senators a call at 202-224-3121 and ask them to block this change.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's a disgusting attempt to disenfranchise millions of women and anyone else who changes their name, or doesn't have time/money for the hassle, but it's also only one prong of the attack. The name match requirement would be at the time of voter registration, so wouldn't affect current voters unless..... Massive swaths were purged from the voter rolls - this is a reason why the feds keep suing for voter roll information from states, and why red states have complied

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 8 points 19 hours ago

Well fuck there's that other shoe... I was wondering where I put it

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (4 children)

I'm a Canadian so I don't have to put up with this... but I don't think I could legally prove citizenship on the spot though.

I do have a birth certificate, but it's damaged, and would be considered invalid. It would cost me money to replace.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

twist: They look at the ID, proclaim it's fake and add them to the ICE bus waiting outside.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

In this case it literally doesn’t even begin to matter for us because all we need is our voter registration paper that government mails to us. We can bring other stuff but that’s it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›